从组织角度理解评估使用:文献回顾和研究议程

IF 1 4区计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE

Performance Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1177/13563890231185164

T. Kupiec, Dorota Celińska-Janowicz, V. Pattyn

{"title":"从组织角度理解评估使用:文献回顾和研究议程","authors":"T. Kupiec, Dorota Celińska-Janowicz, V. Pattyn","doi":"10.1177/13563890231185164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do some types of evaluation use prevail in certain contexts and not in others? The aim of this article is to advance knowledge about organisational factors of evaluation use, that is, determinants of evaluation use grounded in organisational theories. We critically review existing frameworks of organisational factors of evaluation use, highlighting key differences between them and pointing out discrepancies with empirical insights. We discuss the merits of two potential areas for future research that can help concretise theoretical stances: considering organisational legitimacy as a potential direct determinant of evaluation use and incorporating a dynamic perspective in organisational frameworks of evaluation use.","PeriodicalId":19964,"journal":{"name":"Performance Evaluation","volume":"134 1","pages":"338 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding evaluation use from an organisational perspective: A review of the literature and a research agenda\",\"authors\":\"T. Kupiec, Dorota Celińska-Janowicz, V. Pattyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13563890231185164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why do some types of evaluation use prevail in certain contexts and not in others? The aim of this article is to advance knowledge about organisational factors of evaluation use, that is, determinants of evaluation use grounded in organisational theories. We critically review existing frameworks of organisational factors of evaluation use, highlighting key differences between them and pointing out discrepancies with empirical insights. We discuss the merits of two potential areas for future research that can help concretise theoretical stances: considering organisational legitimacy as a potential direct determinant of evaluation use and incorporating a dynamic perspective in organisational frameworks of evaluation use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Performance Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"338 - 355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Performance Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231185164\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231185164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么某些类型的评估使用在某些上下文中流行，而在其他上下文中不流行?本文的目的是促进对评价使用的组织因素的认识，即基于组织理论的评价使用的决定因素。我们批判性地审查现有的评估使用的组织因素框架，突出它们之间的关键差异，并指出与经验见解的差异。我们讨论了未来研究的两个潜在领域的优点，可以帮助具体化理论立场:将组织合法性视为评估使用的潜在直接决定因素，并在评估使用的组织框架中纳入动态视角。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Understanding evaluation use from an organisational perspective: A review of the literature and a research agenda

Why do some types of evaluation use prevail in certain contexts and not in others? The aim of this article is to advance knowledge about organisational factors of evaluation use, that is, determinants of evaluation use grounded in organisational theories. We critically review existing frameworks of organisational factors of evaluation use, highlighting key differences between them and pointing out discrepancies with empirical insights. We discuss the merits of two potential areas for future research that can help concretise theoretical stances: considering organisational legitimacy as a potential direct determinant of evaluation use and incorporating a dynamic perspective in organisational frameworks of evaluation use.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Performance Evaluation 工程技术-计算机：理论方法

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 days

期刊介绍： Performance Evaluation functions as a leading journal in the area of modeling, measurement, and evaluation of performance aspects of computing and communication systems. As such, it aims to present a balanced and complete view of the entire Performance Evaluation profession. Hence, the journal is interested in papers that focus on one or more of the following dimensions: -Define new performance evaluation tools, including measurement and monitoring tools as well as modeling and analytic techniques -Provide new insights into the performance of computing and communication systems -Introduce new application areas where performance evaluation tools can play an important role and creative new uses for performance evaluation tools. More specifically, common application areas of interest include the performance of: -Resource allocation and control methods and algorithms (e.g. routing and flow control in networks, bandwidth allocation, processor scheduling, memory management) -System architecture, design and implementation -Cognitive radio -VANETs -Social networks and media -Energy efficient ICT -Energy harvesting -Data centers -Data centric networks -System reliability -System tuning and capacity planning -Wireless and sensor networks -Autonomic and self-organizing systems -Embedded systems -Network science