台湾北部人工林土壤有机碳储量估算

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Chen-Chi Tsai, Ting Hu, K. Lin, Zueng-Sang Chen
{"title":"台湾北部人工林土壤有机碳储量估算","authors":"Chen-Chi Tsai, Ting Hu, K. Lin, Zueng-Sang Chen","doi":"10.7075/TJFS.200906.0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The possibility of estimating the global carbon pools on the earth has attracted scientists for decades. In Taiwan, among remaining forested areas, 14% (about 420,000 ha) are plantation forests. There are few investigations of the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool of plantation forests in Taiwan. Nine plantation tree species, including 3 broadleaf species and 6 coniferous species were selected to estimate the SOC pools in selected plantation forest soils in northern Taiwan. The uncertainty of the estimates was examined, and strategies to obtain more-precise database for SOC pool management are proposed in this study. The results showed that only 2 Soil Orders, Inceptisols and Ultisols, were found at the study sites, and values of the soil bulk density (Bd) in broadleaf plantation forests were relatively higher than those in coniferous plantation forests. The stone contents were about 17 and 14% (0~30 cm) on average in the broadleaf and coniferous plantations, respectively. The average SOC was about 28 g kg^(-1) (0~30 cm) in the broadleaf plantations and about 48 g kg^(-1) (0~30 cm) in the coniferous plantations. The SOC pool was lowest in the Aleurites fordii plantation forest and highest in the Chamaecyparis obtusa plantation forest. We calculated that the average values of the SOC pool in the broadleaf plantation forest were about 6.5 (0~30 cm), 8.2 (0~50 cm), and 9.6 kg m^(-2) (0~100 cm). In coniferous plantation forests, they were about 7.4, 9.7, and 12 kg m^(-2), respectively. Estimation of the SOC pools in this study was potentially compromised by measurement errors of soil Bd, soil volume calculations, C determinations, and the stoniness of the soils. These sources of error might have introduced a bias, when comparing SOC contents among studies in the literature where different methodologies were applied. In conclusion, we suggest that the database of lower taxonomic categories (i.e., greater detail) for Soil Taxonomy and the SOC variability within and among pedons of the same soil type strongly need estimates of soil C stocks in Taiwan.","PeriodicalId":22180,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"103-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in Plantation Forest Soils of Northern Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Chen-Chi Tsai, Ting Hu, K. Lin, Zueng-Sang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.7075/TJFS.200906.0103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The possibility of estimating the global carbon pools on the earth has attracted scientists for decades. In Taiwan, among remaining forested areas, 14% (about 420,000 ha) are plantation forests. There are few investigations of the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool of plantation forests in Taiwan. Nine plantation tree species, including 3 broadleaf species and 6 coniferous species were selected to estimate the SOC pools in selected plantation forest soils in northern Taiwan. The uncertainty of the estimates was examined, and strategies to obtain more-precise database for SOC pool management are proposed in this study. The results showed that only 2 Soil Orders, Inceptisols and Ultisols, were found at the study sites, and values of the soil bulk density (Bd) in broadleaf plantation forests were relatively higher than those in coniferous plantation forests. The stone contents were about 17 and 14% (0~30 cm) on average in the broadleaf and coniferous plantations, respectively. The average SOC was about 28 g kg^(-1) (0~30 cm) in the broadleaf plantations and about 48 g kg^(-1) (0~30 cm) in the coniferous plantations. The SOC pool was lowest in the Aleurites fordii plantation forest and highest in the Chamaecyparis obtusa plantation forest. We calculated that the average values of the SOC pool in the broadleaf plantation forest were about 6.5 (0~30 cm), 8.2 (0~50 cm), and 9.6 kg m^(-2) (0~100 cm). In coniferous plantation forests, they were about 7.4, 9.7, and 12 kg m^(-2), respectively. Estimation of the SOC pools in this study was potentially compromised by measurement errors of soil Bd, soil volume calculations, C determinations, and the stoniness of the soils. These sources of error might have introduced a bias, when comparing SOC contents among studies in the literature where different methodologies were applied. In conclusion, we suggest that the database of lower taxonomic categories (i.e., greater detail) for Soil Taxonomy and the SOC variability within and among pedons of the same soil type strongly need estimates of soil C stocks in Taiwan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"103-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.200906.0103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.200906.0103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

几十年来,估计地球上全球碳库的可能性一直吸引着科学家们。在台湾,剩下的森林面积中,14%(约42万公顷)是人工林。台湾人工林土壤有机碳库的研究较少。选取9种人工林树种,包括3种阔叶树种和6种针叶树种,对台湾北部人工林土壤的有机碳库进行估算。研究了估算结果的不确定性,并提出了获得更精确的SOC池管理数据库的策略。结果表明:研究点仅存在始土目和终土目2个土壤目,阔叶林土壤容重(Bd)值相对高于针叶林;阔叶林和针叶林平均含石量分别约为17和14% (0~30 cm)。阔叶林的平均有机碳约为28 g kg^(-1) (0~30 cm),针叶林的平均有机碳约为48 g kg^(-1) (0~30 cm)。土壤有机碳库以福桐人工林最低,长叶柏人工林最高。结果表明,阔叶林土壤有机碳库的平均值分别为6.5 (0~30 cm)、8.2 (0~50 cm)和9.6 kg m^(-2) (0~100 cm)。在针叶人工林中,它们分别约为7.4、9.7和12 kg m^(-2)。在本研究中,土壤有机碳库的估算可能会受到土壤Bd、土壤体积计算、碳测定和土壤石质性的测量误差的影响。当比较文献中应用不同方法的研究中SOC含量时,这些错误来源可能会引入偏差。综上所述,我们认为台湾土壤碳储量的估算是土壤分类中较低分类类别(即更详细的分类类别)和同一土壤类型的土壤有机碳变异的重要需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in Plantation Forest Soils of Northern Taiwan
The possibility of estimating the global carbon pools on the earth has attracted scientists for decades. In Taiwan, among remaining forested areas, 14% (about 420,000 ha) are plantation forests. There are few investigations of the soil organic carbon (SOC) pool of plantation forests in Taiwan. Nine plantation tree species, including 3 broadleaf species and 6 coniferous species were selected to estimate the SOC pools in selected plantation forest soils in northern Taiwan. The uncertainty of the estimates was examined, and strategies to obtain more-precise database for SOC pool management are proposed in this study. The results showed that only 2 Soil Orders, Inceptisols and Ultisols, were found at the study sites, and values of the soil bulk density (Bd) in broadleaf plantation forests were relatively higher than those in coniferous plantation forests. The stone contents were about 17 and 14% (0~30 cm) on average in the broadleaf and coniferous plantations, respectively. The average SOC was about 28 g kg^(-1) (0~30 cm) in the broadleaf plantations and about 48 g kg^(-1) (0~30 cm) in the coniferous plantations. The SOC pool was lowest in the Aleurites fordii plantation forest and highest in the Chamaecyparis obtusa plantation forest. We calculated that the average values of the SOC pool in the broadleaf plantation forest were about 6.5 (0~30 cm), 8.2 (0~50 cm), and 9.6 kg m^(-2) (0~100 cm). In coniferous plantation forests, they were about 7.4, 9.7, and 12 kg m^(-2), respectively. Estimation of the SOC pools in this study was potentially compromised by measurement errors of soil Bd, soil volume calculations, C determinations, and the stoniness of the soils. These sources of error might have introduced a bias, when comparing SOC contents among studies in the literature where different methodologies were applied. In conclusion, we suggest that the database of lower taxonomic categories (i.e., greater detail) for Soil Taxonomy and the SOC variability within and among pedons of the same soil type strongly need estimates of soil C stocks in Taiwan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Taiwan Journal of Forest Science is an academic publication that welcomes contributions from around the world. The journal covers all aspects of forest research, both basic and applied, including Forest Biology and Ecology (tree breeding, silviculture, soils, etc.), Forest Management (watershed management, forest pests and diseases, forest fire, wildlife, recreation, etc.), Biotechnology, and Wood Science. Manuscripts acceptable to the journal include (1) research papers, (2) research notes, (3) review articles, and (4) monographs. A research note differs from a research paper in its scope which is less-comprehensive, yet it contains important information. In other words, a research note offers an innovative perspective or new discovery which is worthy of early disclosure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信