组织中的勾结和歧视:评论

Jungwook Kim
{"title":"组织中的勾结和歧视:评论","authors":"Jungwook Kim","doi":"10.17256/JER.2011.16.3.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ishiguro(2004) shows that discriminatory wage schemes are optimal among collusion-proof contracts under relative performance evaluation when agents collude. However, that analysis depends on the assumption that the agents cannot observe their performances. We investigate how optimal contracts should be modified when the agents observe the realized firm value. We show that the optimal collusion-proof contract can be a low-powered incentive scheme with buy-out options under some circumstances. Also, this suggests the frequent use of options in wage scheme as an optimal response to collusion.","PeriodicalId":90860,"journal":{"name":"International journal of economic research","volume":"7 1","pages":"309-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collusion and Discrimination\\\\\\\\in Organizations: Comment\",\"authors\":\"Jungwook Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17256/JER.2011.16.3.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ishiguro(2004) shows that discriminatory wage schemes are optimal among collusion-proof contracts under relative performance evaluation when agents collude. However, that analysis depends on the assumption that the agents cannot observe their performances. We investigate how optimal contracts should be modified when the agents observe the realized firm value. We show that the optimal collusion-proof contract can be a low-powered incentive scheme with buy-out options under some circumstances. Also, this suggests the frequent use of options in wage scheme as an optimal response to collusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"309-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2011.16.3.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2011.16.3.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

Ishiguro(2004)表明,当代理人串通时,在相对绩效评估下,歧视工资方案在防串通合同中是最优的。然而,这种分析依赖于agent无法观察到它们的性能的假设。我们研究了当代理人观察到已实现的企业价值时,如何修改最优契约。我们证明了在某些情况下,最优防合谋契约可以是一个具有买断期权的低功率激励方案。此外,这表明在工资方案中频繁使用期权是对共谋的最佳反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collusion and Discrimination\\in Organizations: Comment
Ishiguro(2004) shows that discriminatory wage schemes are optimal among collusion-proof contracts under relative performance evaluation when agents collude. However, that analysis depends on the assumption that the agents cannot observe their performances. We investigate how optimal contracts should be modified when the agents observe the realized firm value. We show that the optimal collusion-proof contract can be a low-powered incentive scheme with buy-out options under some circumstances. Also, this suggests the frequent use of options in wage scheme as an optimal response to collusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信