巴西儿童水上准备评估的内容、结构、效度、信度和客观性

International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.25035/ijare.13.04.11

N. Valentini, K. Pereira, G. Nobre

{"title":"巴西儿童水上准备评估的内容、结构、效度、信度和客观性","authors":"N. Valentini, K. Pereira, G. Nobre","doi":"10.25035/ijare.13.04.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Aquatic Readiness Assessment (ARA) is an assessment instrument for measuring children's aquatic readiness. The objective of the study was to translate the English version into Portuguese and to investigate the content, construct, and criterion validity as well as the reliability and rater objectivity of the ARA for Brazilian children. Twenty-three professionals and 464 children, newborn to 13 years-old participated in the study. We found strong content (94% to 100% of judges’ agreement) and criterion validity, internal consistency (α from .96 to .97), and inter-rater objectivity (ICC from .81 to .98), and test-retest reliability (ICC from .94 to .98). Appropriate fit indices were observed for the model (CFI = .99; TLI = .99; RMSEA .08, CI 90% = .67 to .10); the model was invariant for boys and girls (CFI = .99; RMSEA = .080; ΔCFI = .009; Δ RMSEA = .015) but not for age groups (CFI = .87, RMSEA = .160). The ARA presented adequate validity and reliability for evaluating the swimming performance of Brazilian children.","PeriodicalId":38535,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content, Construct, and Criterion Validity, Reliability, and Objectivity for Aquatic Readiness Assessment for Brazilian Children\",\"authors\":\"N. Valentini, K. Pereira, G. Nobre\",\"doi\":\"10.25035/ijare.13.04.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Aquatic Readiness Assessment (ARA) is an assessment instrument for measuring children's aquatic readiness. The objective of the study was to translate the English version into Portuguese and to investigate the content, construct, and criterion validity as well as the reliability and rater objectivity of the ARA for Brazilian children. Twenty-three professionals and 464 children, newborn to 13 years-old participated in the study. We found strong content (94% to 100% of judges’ agreement) and criterion validity, internal consistency (α from .96 to .97), and inter-rater objectivity (ICC from .81 to .98), and test-retest reliability (ICC from .94 to .98). Appropriate fit indices were observed for the model (CFI = .99; TLI = .99; RMSEA .08, CI 90% = .67 to .10); the model was invariant for boys and girls (CFI = .99; RMSEA = .080; ΔCFI = .009; Δ RMSEA = .015) but not for age groups (CFI = .87, RMSEA = .160). The ARA presented adequate validity and reliability for evaluating the swimming performance of Brazilian children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25035/ijare.13.04.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25035/ijare.13.04.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

水上准备评估(ARA)是一种测量儿童水上准备的评估工具。本研究的目的是将英语版本翻译成葡萄牙语，并调查巴西儿童ARA的内容、结构、标准效度以及可靠性和客观性。23名专业人员和464名新生儿到13岁的儿童参与了这项研究。我们发现了较强的内容(94%至100%的法官同意)和标准效度，内部一致性(α从0.96到0.97)，评分间客观性(ICC从0.81到0.98)和重测信度(ICC从0.94到0.98)。模型拟合指数适宜(CFI = 0.99;Tli = .99;RMSEA = 0.08, CI 90% = 0.67 ~ 0.10);模型对男孩和女孩是不变的(CFI = .99;Rmsea = .080;Δcfi = .009;Δ RMSEA = .015)，但没有年龄组(CFI = .87, RMSEA = .160)。ARA对于评价巴西儿童游泳成绩具有足够的效度和信度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Content, Construct, and Criterion Validity, Reliability, and Objectivity for Aquatic Readiness Assessment for Brazilian Children

The Aquatic Readiness Assessment (ARA) is an assessment instrument for measuring children's aquatic readiness. The objective of the study was to translate the English version into Portuguese and to investigate the content, construct, and criterion validity as well as the reliability and rater objectivity of the ARA for Brazilian children. Twenty-three professionals and 464 children, newborn to 13 years-old participated in the study. We found strong content (94% to 100% of judges’ agreement) and criterion validity, internal consistency (α from .96 to .97), and inter-rater objectivity (ICC from .81 to .98), and test-retest reliability (ICC from .94 to .98). Appropriate fit indices were observed for the model (CFI = .99; TLI = .99; RMSEA .08, CI 90% = .67 to .10); the model was invariant for boys and girls (CFI = .99; RMSEA = .080; ΔCFI = .009; Δ RMSEA = .015) but not for age groups (CFI = .87, RMSEA = .160). The ARA presented adequate validity and reliability for evaluating the swimming performance of Brazilian children.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量