供应链管理实践(SCMPs)和绩效关系在发展中国家和新兴经济体(dei):一个系统的审查

IF 4.5 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Goitom Abera Baisa, Joachim G. Schäfer, A. Alemu
{"title":"供应链管理实践(SCMPs)和绩效关系在发展中国家和新兴经济体(dei):一个系统的审查","authors":"Goitom Abera Baisa, Joachim G. Schäfer, A. Alemu","doi":"10.1108/bij-08-2022-0538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to synthesize and analyze research on the Supply Chain Management Practices (SCMPs)-performance nexus, examine current knowledge, identify emerging trends, and provide plausible suggestions for future research engagements in the manufacturing sector in the context of Developing and Emerging Economies (DEEs).Design/methodology/approachFollowing a systematic review approach, this study analyzed 20 peer-reviewed scientific journal articles published between 2007 and 2021. The study sample was systematically selected from the Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar databases, following strict evaluation and selection criteria.FindingsNumerous dimensions of SCMPs have been considered in the extant literature; however, six have stood out as the most common. In addition, operational performance stood out as the most widely investigated measure in the SCM literature. Moreover, SCMPs have predominantly shown positive effects on performance outcomes. Methodological issues that future studies should consider are suggested.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample size was not sufficiently large relative to the rule of thumb set in the literature because of the scarcity of studies in the manufacturing sector in the DEEs context. Despite these limitations, the results of this study provide crucial insights into knowledge and practice.Originality/valueThis review is the first of its kind to examine the SCMPs-performance nexus in the context of DEEs. Based on the findings of this study, future research directions are proposed.","PeriodicalId":48029,"journal":{"name":"Benchmarking-An International Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supply chain management practices (SCMPs) and performance nexus in developing and emerging economies (DEEs): a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Goitom Abera Baisa, Joachim G. Schäfer, A. Alemu\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bij-08-2022-0538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims to synthesize and analyze research on the Supply Chain Management Practices (SCMPs)-performance nexus, examine current knowledge, identify emerging trends, and provide plausible suggestions for future research engagements in the manufacturing sector in the context of Developing and Emerging Economies (DEEs).Design/methodology/approachFollowing a systematic review approach, this study analyzed 20 peer-reviewed scientific journal articles published between 2007 and 2021. The study sample was systematically selected from the Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar databases, following strict evaluation and selection criteria.FindingsNumerous dimensions of SCMPs have been considered in the extant literature; however, six have stood out as the most common. In addition, operational performance stood out as the most widely investigated measure in the SCM literature. Moreover, SCMPs have predominantly shown positive effects on performance outcomes. Methodological issues that future studies should consider are suggested.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample size was not sufficiently large relative to the rule of thumb set in the literature because of the scarcity of studies in the manufacturing sector in the DEEs context. Despite these limitations, the results of this study provide crucial insights into knowledge and practice.Originality/valueThis review is the first of its kind to examine the SCMPs-performance nexus in the context of DEEs. Based on the findings of this study, future research directions are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Benchmarking-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Benchmarking-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-08-2022-0538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benchmarking-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-08-2022-0538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在综合和分析供应链管理实践(SCMPs)与绩效关系的研究,检查现有知识,确定新兴趋势,并为发展中国家和新兴经济体(dee)背景下制造业的未来研究提供合理的建议。设计/方法/方法采用系统综述方法,本研究分析了2007年至2021年间发表的20篇同行评议的科学期刊文章。研究样本系统地从Web of Science (WoS)和谷歌Scholar数据库中选取,并遵循严格的评估和选择标准。现有文献中已经考虑了scmp的许多维度;然而,有六种是最常见的。此外,在供应链管理文献中,运营绩效作为最广泛研究的衡量标准脱颖而出。此外,scmp对绩效结果的影响主要是积极的。提出了今后研究应考虑的方法学问题。研究的局限性/意义:由于缺乏对制造业的研究,相对于文献中的经验法则,样本量不够大。尽管存在这些局限性,但本研究的结果为知识和实践提供了重要的见解。原创性/价值这篇综述是第一次在研究生背景下研究《南华早报》与绩效的关系。在此基础上,提出了今后的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supply chain management practices (SCMPs) and performance nexus in developing and emerging economies (DEEs): a systematic review
PurposeThis study aims to synthesize and analyze research on the Supply Chain Management Practices (SCMPs)-performance nexus, examine current knowledge, identify emerging trends, and provide plausible suggestions for future research engagements in the manufacturing sector in the context of Developing and Emerging Economies (DEEs).Design/methodology/approachFollowing a systematic review approach, this study analyzed 20 peer-reviewed scientific journal articles published between 2007 and 2021. The study sample was systematically selected from the Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar databases, following strict evaluation and selection criteria.FindingsNumerous dimensions of SCMPs have been considered in the extant literature; however, six have stood out as the most common. In addition, operational performance stood out as the most widely investigated measure in the SCM literature. Moreover, SCMPs have predominantly shown positive effects on performance outcomes. Methodological issues that future studies should consider are suggested.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample size was not sufficiently large relative to the rule of thumb set in the literature because of the scarcity of studies in the manufacturing sector in the DEEs context. Despite these limitations, the results of this study provide crucial insights into knowledge and practice.Originality/valueThis review is the first of its kind to examine the SCMPs-performance nexus in the context of DEEs. Based on the findings of this study, future research directions are proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Benchmarking is big news for companies committed to total quality programmes. Its enthusiastic reception by many prominent business figures has created high levels of interest in a technique which promises big rewards for co-operating partners. Yet, like total quality itself, it must be understood in its proper context, and implemented single mindedly if it is to be effective - this journal helps companies to decide if benchmarking is right for them, and shows them how to go about it successfully.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信