重大疾病心理社会研究的医学“把关”

Q2 Social Sciences

Illness Crisis and Loss Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1177/1054137317718999

P. McGrath, A. Kaur, Rennette Feracho, M. A. Patton

{"title":"重大疾病心理社会研究的医学“把关”","authors":"P. McGrath, A. Kaur, Rennette Feracho, M. A. Patton","doi":"10.1177/1054137317718999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discussion explores ethical issues associated with medical “gatekeeping” in relation to psychosocial health research associated with serious illness and loss. “Gatekeeping” is defined as the process whereby health-care providers prevent access to eligible patients for research recruitment. The impact of this practice on the research process is explored, including issues of sample representation, selection bias, and wastage of time and resources. The reflection of ethical issues is set in the context of research on clinical empathic responsiveness and accuracy, paternalism, and the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice.","PeriodicalId":39747,"journal":{"name":"Illness Crisis and Loss","volume":"151 1","pages":"218 - 233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical “Gatekeeping” for Psychosocial Research on Serious Illness\",\"authors\":\"P. McGrath, A. Kaur, Rennette Feracho, M. A. Patton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1054137317718999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The discussion explores ethical issues associated with medical “gatekeeping” in relation to psychosocial health research associated with serious illness and loss. “Gatekeeping” is defined as the process whereby health-care providers prevent access to eligible patients for research recruitment. The impact of this practice on the research process is explored, including issues of sample representation, selection bias, and wastage of time and resources. The reflection of ethical issues is set in the context of research on clinical empathic responsiveness and accuracy, paternalism, and the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Illness Crisis and Loss\",\"volume\":\"151 1\",\"pages\":\"218 - 233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Illness Crisis and Loss\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1054137317718999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illness Crisis and Loss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1054137317718999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

讨论探讨了与与严重疾病和损失有关的心理社会健康研究有关的医学"把关"的伦理问题。"把关"的定义是卫生保健提供者阻止接触符合条件的患者进行研究招募的过程。这种做法对研究过程的影响进行了探讨，包括样本代表性问题，选择偏差，浪费时间和资源。伦理问题的反映是在临床共情反应和准确性、家长式作风以及自主、慈善和正义的伦理原则的研究背景下设定的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Medical “Gatekeeping” for Psychosocial Research on Serious Illness

The discussion explores ethical issues associated with medical “gatekeeping” in relation to psychosocial health research associated with serious illness and loss. “Gatekeeping” is defined as the process whereby health-care providers prevent access to eligible patients for research recruitment. The impact of this practice on the research process is explored, including issues of sample representation, selection bias, and wastage of time and resources. The reflection of ethical issues is set in the context of research on clinical empathic responsiveness and accuracy, paternalism, and the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Illness Crisis and Loss Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： When dealing with issues of grief, crisis, or loss as a counselor, medical professional, or researcher, it can be difficult to find resources to help you in your work. Receiving the most current research on the latest topics in the field from Illness, Crisis & Loss can help. Illness, Crisis & Loss is the resource that furthers your understanding and knowledge of the psychosocial and ethical issues associated with life-threatening illness, traumatic human crises, grief, and loss.