范围综述:确定职业性听力损失工人的针对性干预策略

IF 1.7 4区 物理与天体物理
Adelle Liebenberg, Melinda Gardner, Valerie M Nie, Carole L James, Sue Reed
{"title":"范围综述:确定职业性听力损失工人的针对性干预策略","authors":"Adelle Liebenberg,&nbsp;Melinda Gardner,&nbsp;Valerie M Nie,&nbsp;Carole L James,&nbsp;Sue Reed","doi":"10.1007/s40857-023-00302-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An apparent disconnect exist in workplaces regarding identification of occupational hearing loss (OHL) and implementation of specific strategies to prevent progression of OHL, evident through continued high incidence of OHL. This scoping review aimed to identify evidence regarding targeted intervention used by industry, specifically to prevent the progression of OHL for workers. The scoping review was undertaken using the PRISMA-ScR methodology. Search terms were based on three broad categories, hearing loss, workplace, and intervention. Initially 1309 articles were identified for screening and 1,207 studies not meeting the criteria were excluded. Full text reviews of 102 articles were completed and a further 93 studies excluded. The scoping review produced nine studies which were quantitatively analysed. All interventions focused primarily on lower order controls, specifically administrative and personal protective equipment. Eight studies focused on awareness training, health monitoring, mandating hearing protection device use and fit testing, and using personal attenuation ratings as a predictor to OHL. Only one study mentioned isolation of workers from noise sources, and this was an interview study with workplace managers, not a specific intervention at a workplace. The result of the review highlights the lack of published literature on targeted interventions for workers with OHL. There is insufficient evidence to inform effective, impactful change in practice to prevent the progression of OHL. It is recommended that a system of collecting and assessing specific interventions and controls for workers with OHL be developed to better inform industry on strategies that will provide adequate protection for these workers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54355,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40857-023-00302-y.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Scoping Review: Identifying Targeted Intervention Strategies for Workers with Occupational Hearing Loss\",\"authors\":\"Adelle Liebenberg,&nbsp;Melinda Gardner,&nbsp;Valerie M Nie,&nbsp;Carole L James,&nbsp;Sue Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40857-023-00302-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An apparent disconnect exist in workplaces regarding identification of occupational hearing loss (OHL) and implementation of specific strategies to prevent progression of OHL, evident through continued high incidence of OHL. This scoping review aimed to identify evidence regarding targeted intervention used by industry, specifically to prevent the progression of OHL for workers. The scoping review was undertaken using the PRISMA-ScR methodology. Search terms were based on three broad categories, hearing loss, workplace, and intervention. Initially 1309 articles were identified for screening and 1,207 studies not meeting the criteria were excluded. Full text reviews of 102 articles were completed and a further 93 studies excluded. The scoping review produced nine studies which were quantitatively analysed. All interventions focused primarily on lower order controls, specifically administrative and personal protective equipment. Eight studies focused on awareness training, health monitoring, mandating hearing protection device use and fit testing, and using personal attenuation ratings as a predictor to OHL. Only one study mentioned isolation of workers from noise sources, and this was an interview study with workplace managers, not a specific intervention at a workplace. The result of the review highlights the lack of published literature on targeted interventions for workers with OHL. There is insufficient evidence to inform effective, impactful change in practice to prevent the progression of OHL. It is recommended that a system of collecting and assessing specific interventions and controls for workers with OHL be developed to better inform industry on strategies that will provide adequate protection for these workers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acoustics Australia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40857-023-00302-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acoustics Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40857-023-00302-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics Australia","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40857-023-00302-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在职业听力损失(OHL)的识别和防止OHL进展的具体策略的实施方面,工作场所存在明显的脱节,这可以从OHL的持续高发病率中看出。本综述旨在确定有关行业使用的针对性干预措施的证据,特别是防止工人OHL的进展。使用PRISMA-ScR方法进行范围审查。搜索词基于三大类:听力损失、工作场所和干预。最初筛选了1309篇文章,排除了1207篇不符合标准的研究。我们完成了102篇文章的全文综述,并排除了另外93项研究。范围审查产生了九项研究,并对其进行了定量分析。所有干预措施主要侧重于较低级别的控制,特别是行政和个人防护设备。8项研究的重点是意识训练、健康监测、强制使用听力保护装置和适合测试,以及使用个人衰减评级作为OHL的预测指标。只有一项研究提到了将工人与噪声源隔离开来,这是一项对工作场所经理的访谈研究,而不是对工作场所的具体干预。审查的结果强调缺乏发表的文献有针对性地干预工作人员与OHL。没有足够的证据表明在实践中进行有效的、有影响的改变以防止OHL的进展。建议建立一个收集和评估针对职业倦怠症工人的具体干预措施和控制措施的系统,以便更好地向工业界通报将为这些工人提供充分保护的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Scoping Review: Identifying Targeted Intervention Strategies for Workers with Occupational Hearing Loss

A Scoping Review: Identifying Targeted Intervention Strategies for Workers with Occupational Hearing Loss

An apparent disconnect exist in workplaces regarding identification of occupational hearing loss (OHL) and implementation of specific strategies to prevent progression of OHL, evident through continued high incidence of OHL. This scoping review aimed to identify evidence regarding targeted intervention used by industry, specifically to prevent the progression of OHL for workers. The scoping review was undertaken using the PRISMA-ScR methodology. Search terms were based on three broad categories, hearing loss, workplace, and intervention. Initially 1309 articles were identified for screening and 1,207 studies not meeting the criteria were excluded. Full text reviews of 102 articles were completed and a further 93 studies excluded. The scoping review produced nine studies which were quantitatively analysed. All interventions focused primarily on lower order controls, specifically administrative and personal protective equipment. Eight studies focused on awareness training, health monitoring, mandating hearing protection device use and fit testing, and using personal attenuation ratings as a predictor to OHL. Only one study mentioned isolation of workers from noise sources, and this was an interview study with workplace managers, not a specific intervention at a workplace. The result of the review highlights the lack of published literature on targeted interventions for workers with OHL. There is insufficient evidence to inform effective, impactful change in practice to prevent the progression of OHL. It is recommended that a system of collecting and assessing specific interventions and controls for workers with OHL be developed to better inform industry on strategies that will provide adequate protection for these workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acoustics Australia
Acoustics Australia ACOUSTICS-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Acoustics Australia, the journal of the Australian Acoustical Society, has been publishing high quality research and technical papers in all areas of acoustics since commencement in 1972. The target audience for the journal includes both researchers and practitioners. It aims to publish papers and technical notes that are relevant to current acoustics and of interest to members of the Society. These include but are not limited to: Architectural and Building Acoustics, Environmental Noise, Underwater Acoustics, Engineering Noise and Vibration Control, Occupational Noise Management, Hearing, Musical Acoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信