智利企业的竞争、研发与创新

IF 1.4 Q3 MANAGEMENT
José Pablo Montégu, C. Calvo, J. Pertuzé
{"title":"智利企业的竞争、研发与创新","authors":"José Pablo Montégu, C. Calvo, J. Pertuzé","doi":"10.1108/MRJIAM-11-2018-0888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of competition on both innovation inputs and outputs in Chilean firms. More specifically, the authors investigate whether there is an inverted-U relationship at different stages of the innovation process.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe sample covers 1,347 firms that responded to both the 4th Chilean Longitudinal Enterprise Survey and the 10th Chilean Innovation Survey. The CDM model (Crépon et al., 1998) is applied to correct for selectivity bias and endogeneity. Competition is proxied by measures of market concentration. The robustness of the results is checked using four alternative indicators.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results strongly suggest that competition and both R&D and innovation intensities are linked by an inverted U-shaped curve. The estimated effects of competition on innovation output and labor productivity are rather ambiguous. Thus, market structure would be influencing the firms’ incentives to innovate, but not necessarily their innovation performance.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe model is based on cross-sectional data, hampering the possibility to control for unobserved heterogeneity. Competitive pressures from potential entrants and foreign markets are not captured in the analysis.\n\n\nPractical implications\nModerate levels of competition would be the optimal market structure in terms of promoting more business R&D and innovation spending.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nA previously unutilized data set covering the whole economy is used. Estimations are executed at three different stages of the innovation process. Two types of innovation input and four types of innovation output are taken into account.\n","PeriodicalId":45321,"journal":{"name":"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competition, R&D and innovation in Chilean firms\",\"authors\":\"José Pablo Montégu, C. Calvo, J. Pertuzé\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/MRJIAM-11-2018-0888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of competition on both innovation inputs and outputs in Chilean firms. More specifically, the authors investigate whether there is an inverted-U relationship at different stages of the innovation process.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe sample covers 1,347 firms that responded to both the 4th Chilean Longitudinal Enterprise Survey and the 10th Chilean Innovation Survey. The CDM model (Crépon et al., 1998) is applied to correct for selectivity bias and endogeneity. Competition is proxied by measures of market concentration. The robustness of the results is checked using four alternative indicators.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results strongly suggest that competition and both R&D and innovation intensities are linked by an inverted U-shaped curve. The estimated effects of competition on innovation output and labor productivity are rather ambiguous. Thus, market structure would be influencing the firms’ incentives to innovate, but not necessarily their innovation performance.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe model is based on cross-sectional data, hampering the possibility to control for unobserved heterogeneity. Competitive pressures from potential entrants and foreign markets are not captured in the analysis.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nModerate levels of competition would be the optimal market structure in terms of promoting more business R&D and innovation spending.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nA previously unutilized data set covering the whole economy is used. Estimations are executed at three different stages of the innovation process. Two types of innovation input and four types of innovation output are taken into account.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-11-2018-0888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research-The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-11-2018-0888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文的目的是分析竞争对智利企业创新投入和创新产出的影响。更具体地说,作者研究了在创新过程的不同阶段是否存在倒u关系。设计/方法/方法样本涵盖了对第四次智利纵向企业调查和第十次智利创新调查做出回应的1,347家公司。CDM模型(crsampon et al., 1998)用于校正选择性偏差和内生性。竞争是由市场集中度来衡量的。结果的稳健性检查使用四个替代指标。研究结果表明,竞争与研发和创新强度呈倒u型关系。竞争对创新产出和劳动生产率的影响估计相当模糊。因此,市场结构会影响企业的创新激励,但不一定影响其创新绩效。研究局限性/意义该模型基于横断面数据,阻碍了控制未观察到的异质性的可能性。来自潜在进入者和外国市场的竞争压力没有被纳入分析。在促进企业研发和创新支出方面,适度的竞争水平是最优的市场结构。原创性/价值使用了以前未使用的涵盖整个经济的数据集。评估在创新过程的三个不同阶段执行。考虑了两种类型的创新投入和四种类型的创新产出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competition, R&D and innovation in Chilean firms
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of competition on both innovation inputs and outputs in Chilean firms. More specifically, the authors investigate whether there is an inverted-U relationship at different stages of the innovation process. Design/methodology/approach The sample covers 1,347 firms that responded to both the 4th Chilean Longitudinal Enterprise Survey and the 10th Chilean Innovation Survey. The CDM model (Crépon et al., 1998) is applied to correct for selectivity bias and endogeneity. Competition is proxied by measures of market concentration. The robustness of the results is checked using four alternative indicators. Findings The results strongly suggest that competition and both R&D and innovation intensities are linked by an inverted U-shaped curve. The estimated effects of competition on innovation output and labor productivity are rather ambiguous. Thus, market structure would be influencing the firms’ incentives to innovate, but not necessarily their innovation performance. Research limitations/implications The model is based on cross-sectional data, hampering the possibility to control for unobserved heterogeneity. Competitive pressures from potential entrants and foreign markets are not captured in the analysis. Practical implications Moderate levels of competition would be the optimal market structure in terms of promoting more business R&D and innovation spending. Originality/value A previously unutilized data set covering the whole economy is used. Estimations are executed at three different stages of the innovation process. Two types of innovation input and four types of innovation output are taken into account.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Management Research welcomes papers, including cross-disciplinary work, on the following areas (but is not limited to): • Human Resource Management • Strategic Management • Organizational Behaviour • Organization Theory • Corporate Governance • Managerial Economics • Cross Cultural Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信