他们能做的最好的?评估美国在阿富汗战争中的军事效能

IF 1.2 3区社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Armed Forces & Society Pub Date : 2022-08-10 DOI:10.1177/0095327X221116876

Risa A. Brooks

{"title":"他们能做的最好的?评估美国在阿富汗战争中的军事效能","authors":"Risa A. Brooks","doi":"10.1177/0095327X221116876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores shortcomings in military effectiveness in the war in Afghanistan. It focuses on three sets of problems: the failure to resolve internal contradictions in the training effort, the failure to integrate political considerations with military activity, and poor strategic and operational/tactical integration.","PeriodicalId":47332,"journal":{"name":"Armed Forces & Society","volume":"56 1","pages":"913 - 922"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Best They Could Do? Assessing U.S. Military Effectiveness in the Afghanistan War\",\"authors\":\"Risa A. Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0095327X221116876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores shortcomings in military effectiveness in the war in Afghanistan. It focuses on three sets of problems: the failure to resolve internal contradictions in the training effort, the failure to integrate political considerations with military activity, and poor strategic and operational/tactical integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Armed Forces & Society\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"913 - 922\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Armed Forces & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X221116876\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Armed Forces & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X221116876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了阿富汗战争中军事效能的不足。它着重于三组问题:未能解决训练工作中的内部矛盾，未能将政治考虑与军事活动结合起来，以及战略和作战/战术一体化程度差。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Best They Could Do? Assessing U.S. Military Effectiveness in the Afghanistan War

This article explores shortcomings in military effectiveness in the war in Afghanistan. It focuses on three sets of problems: the failure to resolve internal contradictions in the training effort, the failure to integrate political considerations with military activity, and poor strategic and operational/tactical integration.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Armed Forces & Society Multiple-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

28.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Armed Forces & Society: an interdisciplinary journal publishing articles on military institutions, civil-military relations, arms control and peacemaking, and conflict management. The journal is international in scope with a focus on historical, comparative, and interdisciplinary discourse. The editors and contributors include political scientists, sociologists, historians, psychologists, scholars, and economists, as well as specialists in military organization and strategy, arms control, and peacekeeping.