伊索克拉底,第二个海事联盟和亚历山德拉

C. Bouchet
{"title":"伊索克拉底,第二个海事联盟和亚历山德拉","authors":"C. Bouchet","doi":"10.13135/2039-4985/1929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Areopagiticus [VII], well known for its remarks about the Athenian constitution and internal politics, provides nonetheless an analysis of the naval power. If we date this speech after the Social War, in 354, it looks like a bitter observation connected with a condemnation of the maritime empire. But, if, as I try to prove it, the speech has been composed before, in 357/6, even earlier (Isocrates probably started to think about it as soon as 364-360), its impact and its significance are different. Isocrates would prevent the loss of the naval supremacy of Athens. He never condemns it (such a sentence he could not avoid after writing de Pace in 355). On the contrary, supremacy still remains his major preoccupation and he even praises it. The League of Delos was well working when Areopagos was still powerful. The transformation of the internal Athenian politics, and not the arche , is the reason of the polis ’ bane, a polis which can’t keep what generals as Conon or Timothy gave to the Athenians.","PeriodicalId":30377,"journal":{"name":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","volume":"251 1","pages":"423-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isocrate, la seconde Confédération maritime et l’Aréopagitique\",\"authors\":\"C. Bouchet\",\"doi\":\"10.13135/2039-4985/1929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Areopagiticus [VII], well known for its remarks about the Athenian constitution and internal politics, provides nonetheless an analysis of the naval power. If we date this speech after the Social War, in 354, it looks like a bitter observation connected with a condemnation of the maritime empire. But, if, as I try to prove it, the speech has been composed before, in 357/6, even earlier (Isocrates probably started to think about it as soon as 364-360), its impact and its significance are different. Isocrates would prevent the loss of the naval supremacy of Athens. He never condemns it (such a sentence he could not avoid after writing de Pace in 355). On the contrary, supremacy still remains his major preoccupation and he even praises it. The League of Delos was well working when Areopagos was still powerful. The transformation of the internal Athenian politics, and not the arche , is the reason of the polis ’ bane, a polis which can’t keep what generals as Conon or Timothy gave to the Athenians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana\",\"volume\":\"251 1\",\"pages\":\"423-431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13135/2039-4985/1929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13135/2039-4985/1929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《雅典政论》(Areopagiticus [VII])以其对雅典宪法和内部政治的评论而闻名,尽管如此,它还是提供了对海军力量的分析。如果我们把这段演讲的时间定在社会战争之后,也就是354年,它看起来像是一段与谴责海上帝国有关的苦涩言论。但是,如果正如我试图证明的那样,这篇演讲是在357年或更早之前写的,甚至更早(伊索克拉底可能早在364年至360年就开始考虑它了),它的影响和意义就不同了。伊索克拉底将阻止雅典失去海上霸权。他从未谴责过它(在355年写《论佩斯》后,他无法避免使用这句话)。相反,至高无上仍然是他的主要关注点,他甚至赞扬它。当亚略帕戈斯还很强大的时候,提洛斯联盟运转良好。雅典内部政治的转变,而不是拱门,是城邦灭亡的原因,城邦无法保留像科农或蒂莫西这样的将军给雅典人的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isocrate, la seconde Confédération maritime et l’Aréopagitique
The Areopagiticus [VII], well known for its remarks about the Athenian constitution and internal politics, provides nonetheless an analysis of the naval power. If we date this speech after the Social War, in 354, it looks like a bitter observation connected with a condemnation of the maritime empire. But, if, as I try to prove it, the speech has been composed before, in 357/6, even earlier (Isocrates probably started to think about it as soon as 364-360), its impact and its significance are different. Isocrates would prevent the loss of the naval supremacy of Athens. He never condemns it (such a sentence he could not avoid after writing de Pace in 355). On the contrary, supremacy still remains his major preoccupation and he even praises it. The League of Delos was well working when Areopagos was still powerful. The transformation of the internal Athenian politics, and not the arche , is the reason of the polis ’ bane, a polis which can’t keep what generals as Conon or Timothy gave to the Athenians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信