麦康基肉汤和本地配制液对ALSCON wsp中大肠菌群的分析

E. Ukpong, Udechukwu John Abaraugu
{"title":"麦康基肉汤和本地配制液对ALSCON wsp中大肠菌群的分析","authors":"E. Ukpong, Udechukwu John Abaraugu","doi":"10.4314/GJER.V13I1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Enumeration of coliform bacteria in wastewater was carried out by comparing between imported Macconkey broth solution and the locally prepared solution type. Wastewater samples were obtained from four Waste Stabilization ponds (WSPs) at the Aluminium smelting company located at Ikot Abasi Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State. The results of the Analysis showed that the imported media yielded higher numbers of coliform bacteria per 100ml, as compared to the locally prepared media. Two methods where used for this analysis namely: the membrane Filtration Technique (MFT) and the Multiple Tube Technique (MTT). The MFT was more precise, simple and faster in enumerating coliofrm bacteria per 100ml as compared with the MTT method. The two methods (MTT and MFT) was used to determine the amount of coliform present in two different samples each of locally male solution and imported  Macckonkey broth solution. The Average results obtained for sample 1 from the MTT method for ponds 01 to ponds 04 respectively for  locally made solution are 255.75, 268,271.25, and 262, while  that from imported solution are 293.75, 312, 317, and 2995. also the average result from MFT for locally made solution are 246, 260.5, 257.5 and 247.5; while that for imported solution is 265.25, 282, 278, and  267.75 all in multiples of 1000. For sample 2, the results obtained from MTT method from ponds 1 to 4 for locally mixed solution are 178.25, 192.5, 184.5 and 177.5, while that of imported macConkey broth solution are  158, 167, 5, 171.25 and 162. Also that of MFT for locally mixed solution are 206.25, 227,206.25 and 211.75, while that of imported macConkey solution are. 186,201.75, 187.5 and 187.5 all in multiples of 1000 per 100ml the other average results from pond 1 to 4 are  obtained from the different compartments of each pond, this includes the pH of sample  (6.853, 6.6.55, 6.378 and 6.918), The TDS (81.125, 98.25, 116.575, and 129.010), the DO (2.893, 2.585, 2.58, and 2.798), the BOD (1.748, 1.435, 1.430, and 1.648), The COD (98, 115.25, 124,70 and 131.160), conductivity (162.7, 197, 233.4 and 258.05), and Temperature in celcius (28.25, 29.145, 29.155, 28.685).","PeriodicalId":12520,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Research In Engineering","volume":"31 1","pages":"21-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Coliform Bacteria in WSPs at ALSCON Using Macconkey Broth and Locally made Solution\",\"authors\":\"E. Ukpong, Udechukwu John Abaraugu\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/GJER.V13I1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Enumeration of coliform bacteria in wastewater was carried out by comparing between imported Macconkey broth solution and the locally prepared solution type. Wastewater samples were obtained from four Waste Stabilization ponds (WSPs) at the Aluminium smelting company located at Ikot Abasi Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State. The results of the Analysis showed that the imported media yielded higher numbers of coliform bacteria per 100ml, as compared to the locally prepared media. Two methods where used for this analysis namely: the membrane Filtration Technique (MFT) and the Multiple Tube Technique (MTT). The MFT was more precise, simple and faster in enumerating coliofrm bacteria per 100ml as compared with the MTT method. The two methods (MTT and MFT) was used to determine the amount of coliform present in two different samples each of locally male solution and imported  Macckonkey broth solution. The Average results obtained for sample 1 from the MTT method for ponds 01 to ponds 04 respectively for  locally made solution are 255.75, 268,271.25, and 262, while  that from imported solution are 293.75, 312, 317, and 2995. also the average result from MFT for locally made solution are 246, 260.5, 257.5 and 247.5; while that for imported solution is 265.25, 282, 278, and  267.75 all in multiples of 1000. For sample 2, the results obtained from MTT method from ponds 1 to 4 for locally mixed solution are 178.25, 192.5, 184.5 and 177.5, while that of imported macConkey broth solution are  158, 167, 5, 171.25 and 162. Also that of MFT for locally mixed solution are 206.25, 227,206.25 and 211.75, while that of imported macConkey solution are. 186,201.75, 187.5 and 187.5 all in multiples of 1000 per 100ml the other average results from pond 1 to 4 are  obtained from the different compartments of each pond, this includes the pH of sample  (6.853, 6.6.55, 6.378 and 6.918), The TDS (81.125, 98.25, 116.575, and 129.010), the DO (2.893, 2.585, 2.58, and 2.798), the BOD (1.748, 1.435, 1.430, and 1.648), The COD (98, 115.25, 124,70 and 131.160), conductivity (162.7, 197, 233.4 and 258.05), and Temperature in celcius (28.25, 29.145, 29.155, 28.685).\",\"PeriodicalId\":12520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Research In Engineering\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"21-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Research In Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/GJER.V13I1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Research In Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/GJER.V13I1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过对进口麦康基肉汤溶液和本地配制的溶液进行比较,对废水中的大肠菌群进行计数。废水样本是从位于阿夸伊博姆州Ikot Abasi地方政府区的铝冶炼公司的四个废物稳定池(WSPs)获得的。分析结果显示,与本地配制的培养基相比,进口培养基每百毫升产生的大肠菌群数目较高。两种方法用于这种分析,即:膜过滤技术(MFT)和多管技术(MTT)。与MTT法相比,MFT法对每100ml大肠菌群计数更准确、简单、快速。采用MTT和MFT两种方法分别测定了本地雄液和进口麦肯基肉汤溶液中大肠菌群的含量。样品1的MTT法对01 ~ 04池的本地溶液的平均结果分别为255.75、268,271.25和262,对进口溶液的平均结果分别为293.75、312、317和2995。国产溶液的MFT平均结果分别为246、260.5、257.5和247.5;而导入溶液的值是265.25、282、278和267.75,都是1000的倍数。样本2中,1 ~ 4池MTT法对本地混合溶液的测定结果为178.25、192.5、184.5和177.5,进口麦康基肉汤溶液的测定结果为158、167、5、171.25和162。本地混合溶液的MFT分别为206.25、227,206.25和211.75,进口麦康基溶液的MFT分别为。186201、187.5和187.5每100毫升1000的倍数的所有其他平均池塘1到4的结果从不同的隔间获得每个池塘,这包括pH值的样本(6.6.55 6.853,6.378和6.918),TDS(81.125, 98.25, 116.575和129.010),做的(2.893,2.585,2.58和2.798),对BOD(1.748, 1.435, 1.430和1.648),鳕鱼(98、115.25、124、70和131.160),导电率(162.7,197,233.4和258.05),和温度在摄氏(28.25,29.145,29.155,28.685)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Coliform Bacteria in WSPs at ALSCON Using Macconkey Broth and Locally made Solution
Enumeration of coliform bacteria in wastewater was carried out by comparing between imported Macconkey broth solution and the locally prepared solution type. Wastewater samples were obtained from four Waste Stabilization ponds (WSPs) at the Aluminium smelting company located at Ikot Abasi Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State. The results of the Analysis showed that the imported media yielded higher numbers of coliform bacteria per 100ml, as compared to the locally prepared media. Two methods where used for this analysis namely: the membrane Filtration Technique (MFT) and the Multiple Tube Technique (MTT). The MFT was more precise, simple and faster in enumerating coliofrm bacteria per 100ml as compared with the MTT method. The two methods (MTT and MFT) was used to determine the amount of coliform present in two different samples each of locally male solution and imported  Macckonkey broth solution. The Average results obtained for sample 1 from the MTT method for ponds 01 to ponds 04 respectively for  locally made solution are 255.75, 268,271.25, and 262, while  that from imported solution are 293.75, 312, 317, and 2995. also the average result from MFT for locally made solution are 246, 260.5, 257.5 and 247.5; while that for imported solution is 265.25, 282, 278, and  267.75 all in multiples of 1000. For sample 2, the results obtained from MTT method from ponds 1 to 4 for locally mixed solution are 178.25, 192.5, 184.5 and 177.5, while that of imported macConkey broth solution are  158, 167, 5, 171.25 and 162. Also that of MFT for locally mixed solution are 206.25, 227,206.25 and 211.75, while that of imported macConkey solution are. 186,201.75, 187.5 and 187.5 all in multiples of 1000 per 100ml the other average results from pond 1 to 4 are  obtained from the different compartments of each pond, this includes the pH of sample  (6.853, 6.6.55, 6.378 and 6.918), The TDS (81.125, 98.25, 116.575, and 129.010), the DO (2.893, 2.585, 2.58, and 2.798), the BOD (1.748, 1.435, 1.430, and 1.648), The COD (98, 115.25, 124,70 and 131.160), conductivity (162.7, 197, 233.4 and 258.05), and Temperature in celcius (28.25, 29.145, 29.155, 28.685).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信