告密者。蛇。摩尔。书。:检查对“内部/外部”研究人员在纠正中的反应

Talisa J. Carter, Chelsea Thomson
{"title":"告密者。蛇。摩尔。书。:检查对“内部/外部”研究人员在纠正中的反应","authors":"Talisa J. Carter, Chelsea Thomson","doi":"10.21428/88de04a1.e17dd06f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Qualitative researchers face unique challenges when conducting original data collection within facilities of confinement. These challenges are shaped by a range of factors including the study’s research design, researcher identity, and organizational climate of the facility. Although the barriers of data collection in corrections are known, literature providing context, nuance, and recommendations for overcoming these obstacles is sparse, especially for qualitative fieldwork. This work addresses this gap by examining responses of correctional employees to observational research. During data collection, correctional staff called the primary author “snitch,” “snake,” “mole,” and “Books.” This paper investigates these labels and offers suggestions on how future researchers can navigate their experiences.","PeriodicalId":90621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Snitch. Snake. Mole. Books.: Examining Responses to “Insider/Outsider” Researchers in Corrections\",\"authors\":\"Talisa J. Carter, Chelsea Thomson\",\"doi\":\"10.21428/88de04a1.e17dd06f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Qualitative researchers face unique challenges when conducting original data collection within facilities of confinement. These challenges are shaped by a range of factors including the study’s research design, researcher identity, and organizational climate of the facility. Although the barriers of data collection in corrections are known, literature providing context, nuance, and recommendations for overcoming these obstacles is sparse, especially for qualitative fieldwork. This work addresses this gap by examining responses of correctional employees to observational research. During data collection, correctional staff called the primary author “snitch,” “snake,” “mole,” and “Books.” This paper investigates these labels and offers suggestions on how future researchers can navigate their experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.e17dd06f\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.e17dd06f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

定性研究人员在封闭设施内进行原始数据收集时面临着独特的挑战。这些挑战是由一系列因素形成的,包括研究的研究设计、研究人员的身份和设施的组织环境。虽然数据收集在纠正方面的障碍是已知的,但提供上下文、细微差别和克服这些障碍的建议的文献很少,特别是定性实地调查。这项工作通过检查惩教人员对观察性研究的反应来解决这一差距。在数据收集过程中,惩教人员称主要作者为“告密者”、“蛇”、“鼹鼠”和“书籍”。本文调查了这些标签,并为未来的研究人员如何驾驭他们的经历提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Snitch. Snake. Mole. Books.: Examining Responses to “Insider/Outsider” Researchers in Corrections
: Qualitative researchers face unique challenges when conducting original data collection within facilities of confinement. These challenges are shaped by a range of factors including the study’s research design, researcher identity, and organizational climate of the facility. Although the barriers of data collection in corrections are known, literature providing context, nuance, and recommendations for overcoming these obstacles is sparse, especially for qualitative fieldwork. This work addresses this gap by examining responses of correctional employees to observational research. During data collection, correctional staff called the primary author “snitch,” “snake,” “mole,” and “Books.” This paper investigates these labels and offers suggestions on how future researchers can navigate their experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信