Ilaria Marcomini, Roberta Pendoni, Debora Rosa, Giulia Locatelli, Laura Milani, S. Terzoni, Serpil ÇELİK DURMUŞ
{"title":"意大利第一个护士-护士合作量表的验证","authors":"Ilaria Marcomini, Roberta Pendoni, Debora Rosa, Giulia Locatelli, Laura Milani, S. Terzoni, Serpil ÇELİK DURMUŞ","doi":"10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim of the work: Collaboration between colleagues is an essential element of clinical nursing care because it helps to ensure patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale (NNCS). The secondary goal of this study was to assess the degree of collaboration between nurses in Italy. Methods: First, the cultural adaptation of the NNCS tool was performed. The face and content validity of the tool were assessed through the involvement of nursing experts. To test construct validity, a cross-sectional web-based study was conducted on a sample of 362 clinical nurses. Results: The Italian version of the NNCS was composed of 23 items distributed across the original five domains. Ten items were removed from the original instrument because they showed several cross-loadings on more than one factor. The five-dimensional model showed an adequate model goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.883, SRMR=0.072). The NNCS dimension with the highest average score was Professionalism (M=3.10 ± 0.45), while Conflict Management (M=2.14 ± 0.47) exhibited the lowest score. Conclusions: The Italian version of the NNCS is a valid and reliable tool. More effort should be made to ensure the proper management of conflicts in healthcare environments.","PeriodicalId":93849,"journal":{"name":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","volume":"221 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The first Italian validation of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale\",\"authors\":\"Ilaria Marcomini, Roberta Pendoni, Debora Rosa, Giulia Locatelli, Laura Milani, S. Terzoni, Serpil ÇELİK DURMUŞ\",\"doi\":\"10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aim of the work: Collaboration between colleagues is an essential element of clinical nursing care because it helps to ensure patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale (NNCS). The secondary goal of this study was to assess the degree of collaboration between nurses in Italy. Methods: First, the cultural adaptation of the NNCS tool was performed. The face and content validity of the tool were assessed through the involvement of nursing experts. To test construct validity, a cross-sectional web-based study was conducted on a sample of 362 clinical nurses. Results: The Italian version of the NNCS was composed of 23 items distributed across the original five domains. Ten items were removed from the original instrument because they showed several cross-loadings on more than one factor. The five-dimensional model showed an adequate model goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.883, SRMR=0.072). The NNCS dimension with the highest average score was Professionalism (M=3.10 ± 0.45), while Conflict Management (M=2.14 ± 0.47) exhibited the lowest score. Conclusions: The Italian version of the NNCS is a valid and reliable tool. More effort should be made to ensure the proper management of conflicts in healthcare environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The first Italian validation of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale
Background and aim of the work: Collaboration between colleagues is an essential element of clinical nursing care because it helps to ensure patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale (NNCS). The secondary goal of this study was to assess the degree of collaboration between nurses in Italy. Methods: First, the cultural adaptation of the NNCS tool was performed. The face and content validity of the tool were assessed through the involvement of nursing experts. To test construct validity, a cross-sectional web-based study was conducted on a sample of 362 clinical nurses. Results: The Italian version of the NNCS was composed of 23 items distributed across the original five domains. Ten items were removed from the original instrument because they showed several cross-loadings on more than one factor. The five-dimensional model showed an adequate model goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.883, SRMR=0.072). The NNCS dimension with the highest average score was Professionalism (M=3.10 ± 0.45), while Conflict Management (M=2.14 ± 0.47) exhibited the lowest score. Conclusions: The Italian version of the NNCS is a valid and reliable tool. More effort should be made to ensure the proper management of conflicts in healthcare environments.