意大利第一个护士-护士合作量表的验证

Ilaria Marcomini, Roberta Pendoni, Debora Rosa, Giulia Locatelli, Laura Milani, S. Terzoni, Serpil ÇELİK DURMUŞ
{"title":"意大利第一个护士-护士合作量表的验证","authors":"Ilaria Marcomini, Roberta Pendoni, Debora Rosa, Giulia Locatelli, Laura Milani, S. Terzoni, Serpil ÇELİK DURMUŞ","doi":"10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim of the work: Collaboration between colleagues is an essential element of clinical nursing care because it helps to ensure patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale (NNCS). The secondary goal of this study was to assess the degree of collaboration between nurses in Italy. Methods: First, the cultural adaptation of the NNCS tool was performed. The face and content validity of the tool were assessed through the involvement of nursing experts. To test construct validity, a cross-sectional web-based study was conducted on a sample of 362 clinical nurses. Results: The Italian version of the NNCS was composed of 23 items distributed across the original five domains. Ten items were removed from the original instrument because they showed several cross-loadings on more than one factor. The five-dimensional model showed an adequate model goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.883, SRMR=0.072). The NNCS dimension with the highest average score was Professionalism (M=3.10 ± 0.45), while Conflict Management (M=2.14 ± 0.47) exhibited the lowest score. Conclusions: The Italian version of the NNCS is a valid and reliable tool. More effort should be made to ensure the proper management of conflicts in healthcare environments.","PeriodicalId":93849,"journal":{"name":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","volume":"221 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The first Italian validation of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale\",\"authors\":\"Ilaria Marcomini, Roberta Pendoni, Debora Rosa, Giulia Locatelli, Laura Milani, S. Terzoni, Serpil ÇELİK DURMUŞ\",\"doi\":\"10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aim of the work: Collaboration between colleagues is an essential element of clinical nursing care because it helps to ensure patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale (NNCS). The secondary goal of this study was to assess the degree of collaboration between nurses in Italy. Methods: First, the cultural adaptation of the NNCS tool was performed. The face and content validity of the tool were assessed through the involvement of nursing experts. To test construct validity, a cross-sectional web-based study was conducted on a sample of 362 clinical nurses. Results: The Italian version of the NNCS was composed of 23 items distributed across the original five domains. Ten items were removed from the original instrument because they showed several cross-loadings on more than one factor. The five-dimensional model showed an adequate model goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.883, SRMR=0.072). The NNCS dimension with the highest average score was Professionalism (M=3.10 ± 0.45), while Conflict Management (M=2.14 ± 0.47) exhibited the lowest score. Conclusions: The Italian version of the NNCS is a valid and reliable tool. More effort should be made to ensure the proper management of conflicts in healthcare environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作背景和目的:同事之间的协作是临床护理的基本要素,因为它有助于确保患者的安全。本研究旨在评估意大利版护士-护士合作量表(NNCS)的心理测量特性。本研究的第二个目标是评估意大利护士之间的合作程度。方法:首先,对NNCS工具进行文化适应。通过护理专家的参与,评估了工具的面效度和内容效度。为了检验结构效度,我们对362名临床护士进行了一项基于网络的横断面研究。结果:意大利语版NNCS由23个项目组成,分布在原来的5个领域。从原始仪器中删除了10个项目,因为它们在一个以上的因素上显示了几个交叉负载。五维模型具有良好的模型拟合优度(RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.883, SRMR=0.072)。NNCS维度平均得分最高的是专业性(M=3.10±0.45),最低的是冲突管理(M=2.14±0.47)。结论:意大利版NNCS是一种有效、可靠的工具。应作出更多努力,确保在医疗保健环境中妥善管理冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The first Italian validation of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale
Background and aim of the work: Collaboration between colleagues is an essential element of clinical nursing care because it helps to ensure patient safety. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale (NNCS). The secondary goal of this study was to assess the degree of collaboration between nurses in Italy. Methods: First, the cultural adaptation of the NNCS tool was performed. The face and content validity of the tool were assessed through the involvement of nursing experts. To test construct validity, a cross-sectional web-based study was conducted on a sample of 362 clinical nurses. Results: The Italian version of the NNCS was composed of 23 items distributed across the original five domains. Ten items were removed from the original instrument because they showed several cross-loadings on more than one factor. The five-dimensional model showed an adequate model goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.075, CFI=0.883, SRMR=0.072). The NNCS dimension with the highest average score was Professionalism (M=3.10 ± 0.45), while Conflict Management (M=2.14 ± 0.47) exhibited the lowest score. Conclusions: The Italian version of the NNCS is a valid and reliable tool. More effort should be made to ensure the proper management of conflicts in healthcare environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信