学术和非学术阿根廷牙医自我报告的牙齿使用和调理习惯。

Hernan J Tartacovsky, Verónica Ciparelli, L. Horvath, Martín García-Cuerva, Sebastian Tortoni, M. Iglesias
{"title":"学术和非学术阿根廷牙医自我报告的牙齿使用和调理习惯。","authors":"Hernan J Tartacovsky, Verónica Ciparelli, L. Horvath, Martín García-Cuerva, Sebastian Tortoni, M. Iglesias","doi":"10.54589/aol.33/3/195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The removal of tissues affected by caries lesions is one of the most frequent procedures in daily dental practice. The aim of this study was to collect information about the habits of members of the academic and non-academic dental community in Argentina regarding the use and conditioning of burs employed in the removal of dentin during the treatment of carious lesions. A 14- item questionnaire was prepared, and once validated in small groups, it was sent to three lists of dental subscribers through the computer services area of the School of Dentistry, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina (FOUBA). By the deadline for receiving responses, which was set as four weeks after the sending date, 294 replies were received. Results: percentage (95%CI): 47.93% (42.18-53.68%) of the respondents were faculty members, of whom 37.24% (31.68-42.81%) claimed to belong to FOUBA. Of the respondents, 26.90% (21.79-32.00%) reported being under 35 years old, 37.59% (32.01-43.16%) 36 to 45 years old, 22.07% (17.30-26.84%) 46 to 55 years and 11.38% (7.72-15.03%) over 55 years. Regarding bur type, 68.07% (62.31%-73.44%) claimed to use round burs to remove carious dentin and 27.72% (22.60%-23.31%) round + others. Regarding rotary speed, 22.07% (17.30-26.84%) use medium speed, 32.76% (27.36-38.16%) use high speed, and 32.76% (27.36-38.16%) use medium + super high. Only 17.93% (13.52- 22.35%) indicated that they know how to quantify the number of times they use their burs, while 50.34% (44.59-56.10%) of the respondents said that they use burs \"until they no longer cut\", 23.79% (18.89-28.69%) use them 1 to 5 times. 98.27% (96.77-99.77%) said they clean their burs once used. When the answers regarding the use of rubber dam were compared with area of specialization (Chi-square), it was found that faculty members mention the use of burs under rubber dam always or almost always 74.82% (67.60-82.04%) while outside the academic field, 51.01% (42.98-59.03%) of dentists say that they never or almost never do so (p <0.001). Conclusion: Most respondents state that they sterilize their rotary instruments in some way after use. About half of them do not keep track of the number of uses and use burs \"until they no longer cut\".","PeriodicalId":7033,"journal":{"name":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-reported habits regarding dental bur use and conditioning among academic and non-academic argentinian dentists.\",\"authors\":\"Hernan J Tartacovsky, Verónica Ciparelli, L. Horvath, Martín García-Cuerva, Sebastian Tortoni, M. Iglesias\",\"doi\":\"10.54589/aol.33/3/195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The removal of tissues affected by caries lesions is one of the most frequent procedures in daily dental practice. The aim of this study was to collect information about the habits of members of the academic and non-academic dental community in Argentina regarding the use and conditioning of burs employed in the removal of dentin during the treatment of carious lesions. A 14- item questionnaire was prepared, and once validated in small groups, it was sent to three lists of dental subscribers through the computer services area of the School of Dentistry, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina (FOUBA). By the deadline for receiving responses, which was set as four weeks after the sending date, 294 replies were received. Results: percentage (95%CI): 47.93% (42.18-53.68%) of the respondents were faculty members, of whom 37.24% (31.68-42.81%) claimed to belong to FOUBA. Of the respondents, 26.90% (21.79-32.00%) reported being under 35 years old, 37.59% (32.01-43.16%) 36 to 45 years old, 22.07% (17.30-26.84%) 46 to 55 years and 11.38% (7.72-15.03%) over 55 years. Regarding bur type, 68.07% (62.31%-73.44%) claimed to use round burs to remove carious dentin and 27.72% (22.60%-23.31%) round + others. Regarding rotary speed, 22.07% (17.30-26.84%) use medium speed, 32.76% (27.36-38.16%) use high speed, and 32.76% (27.36-38.16%) use medium + super high. Only 17.93% (13.52- 22.35%) indicated that they know how to quantify the number of times they use their burs, while 50.34% (44.59-56.10%) of the respondents said that they use burs \\\"until they no longer cut\\\", 23.79% (18.89-28.69%) use them 1 to 5 times. 98.27% (96.77-99.77%) said they clean their burs once used. When the answers regarding the use of rubber dam were compared with area of specialization (Chi-square), it was found that faculty members mention the use of burs under rubber dam always or almost always 74.82% (67.60-82.04%) while outside the academic field, 51.01% (42.98-59.03%) of dentists say that they never or almost never do so (p <0.001). Conclusion: Most respondents state that they sterilize their rotary instruments in some way after use. About half of them do not keep track of the number of uses and use burs \\\"until they no longer cut\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":7033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.33/3/195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.33/3/195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

去除受龋齿损害影响的组织是日常牙科实践中最常见的程序之一。本研究的目的是收集阿根廷学术界和非学术界牙科社区成员在治疗龋齿损伤期间去除牙本质时使用和调节毛刺的习惯信息。准备了一份包含14个项目的问卷,在小组中验证后,通过阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯大学牙科学院(FOUBA)的计算机服务区将问卷发送给三个牙科订阅者名单。到收到答复的截止日期,即在发出日期后四周,收到了294份答复。结果:被调查者中有47.93%(42.18 ~ 53.68%)为教师,其中37.24%(31.68 ~ 42.81%)自称属于FOUBA。35岁以下占26.90%(21.79 ~ 32.00%),36 ~ 45岁占37.59%(32.01 ~ 43.16%),46 ~ 55岁占22.07%(17.30 ~ 26.84%),55岁以上占11.38%(7.72 ~ 15.03%)。在牙槽类型方面,68.07%(62.31% ~ 73.44%)的人表示使用圆牙槽去除牙槽内龋质,27.72%(22.60% ~ 23.31%)的人表示使用圆牙槽+其他牙槽。转速方面,22.07%(17.30 ~ 26.84%)为中速,32.76%(27.36 ~ 38.16%)为高速,32.76%(27.36 ~ 38.16%)为中+超高。只有17.93%(13.52 ~ 22.35%)的受访者表示知道如何量化自己使用毛刺的次数,而50.34%(44.59 ~ 56.10%)的受访者表示“直到不再切割为止”使用毛刺,23.79%(18.89 ~ 28.69%)的受访者使用1 ~ 5次。98.27%(96.77-99.77%)表示使用后会清洗毛刺。将关于橡胶坝使用情况的回答与专业领域进行对比(χ 2),发现74.82%(67.60 ~ 82.04%)的教师提到橡胶坝下使用毛刺,而51.01%(42.98 ~ 59.03%)的牙医表示从未或几乎从未使用过(p <0.001)。结论:大多数受访者表示,他们消毒他们的旋转仪器以某种方式使用后。大约一半的人不记录使用次数,使用毛刺“直到它们不再切割”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-reported habits regarding dental bur use and conditioning among academic and non-academic argentinian dentists.
The removal of tissues affected by caries lesions is one of the most frequent procedures in daily dental practice. The aim of this study was to collect information about the habits of members of the academic and non-academic dental community in Argentina regarding the use and conditioning of burs employed in the removal of dentin during the treatment of carious lesions. A 14- item questionnaire was prepared, and once validated in small groups, it was sent to three lists of dental subscribers through the computer services area of the School of Dentistry, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina (FOUBA). By the deadline for receiving responses, which was set as four weeks after the sending date, 294 replies were received. Results: percentage (95%CI): 47.93% (42.18-53.68%) of the respondents were faculty members, of whom 37.24% (31.68-42.81%) claimed to belong to FOUBA. Of the respondents, 26.90% (21.79-32.00%) reported being under 35 years old, 37.59% (32.01-43.16%) 36 to 45 years old, 22.07% (17.30-26.84%) 46 to 55 years and 11.38% (7.72-15.03%) over 55 years. Regarding bur type, 68.07% (62.31%-73.44%) claimed to use round burs to remove carious dentin and 27.72% (22.60%-23.31%) round + others. Regarding rotary speed, 22.07% (17.30-26.84%) use medium speed, 32.76% (27.36-38.16%) use high speed, and 32.76% (27.36-38.16%) use medium + super high. Only 17.93% (13.52- 22.35%) indicated that they know how to quantify the number of times they use their burs, while 50.34% (44.59-56.10%) of the respondents said that they use burs "until they no longer cut", 23.79% (18.89-28.69%) use them 1 to 5 times. 98.27% (96.77-99.77%) said they clean their burs once used. When the answers regarding the use of rubber dam were compared with area of specialization (Chi-square), it was found that faculty members mention the use of burs under rubber dam always or almost always 74.82% (67.60-82.04%) while outside the academic field, 51.01% (42.98-59.03%) of dentists say that they never or almost never do so (p <0.001). Conclusion: Most respondents state that they sterilize their rotary instruments in some way after use. About half of them do not keep track of the number of uses and use burs "until they no longer cut".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信