Foley导管与双球囊(cook)导管在宫颈不良妇女引产的比较研究

Hossam M Abdelnaby, Hussin M Abdeldayem, E. F. Gerbash, M. Harira, M. Lashin, A. Abdou
{"title":"Foley导管与双球囊(cook)导管在宫颈不良妇女引产的比较研究","authors":"Hossam M Abdelnaby, Hussin M Abdeldayem, E. F. Gerbash, M. Harira, M. Lashin, A. Abdou","doi":"10.4172/2161-0932.1000474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of single- and double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor among women with an unripe cervix. Study design: This prospective randomize interventional study was performed in emergency department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagazig University and ELGALAA maternity hospitals during the period from 6/2017 till 2/2018. In this study (180 patients) who fulfill inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled and were divided into two main groups; single and double balloon group. Each group included equal number of prim gravida and multigravida. Result Of 180 pregnant women recruited in this study 160 continued till the end of the study. Pain encountered by using visual analogue scale during the catheter insertion the mean pain perception during catheter insertion was 3.3 ± 2.3 in the Foley catheter group and 3.1 ± 2.47 in the Cook catheter group. In the Foley catheter group there were significantly more spontaneous expulsions of the balloon compared with the Cook balloon group. In the Foley catheter group 82.2% of them delivered vaginally and 17.8% delivered by caesarean section. In cook catheter group 80% of them delivered vaginally and 18% delivered by caesarean section. Regarding maternal complications There were 4 cases of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), 3 of them were atonic PPH, and only one case with traumatic PPH due to cervical tear in the Cook catheter group and in foley catheter group there were 3 cases of postpartum hemorrhage all of them atonic postpartum. Conclusion: There is significant difference between the two groups regarding Bishop Score after the balloon catheter expulsion or removal and it was significantly higher in the Cook cervical ripening balloon group, but only in the nulliparous group. Putting in mind that the Foley catheter is cheaper than double balloon catheter and at least as effective as Cook catheter or even better, it is recommended to use Foley catheter in induction of labor instead of double balloon catheter.","PeriodicalId":22164,"journal":{"name":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study for Labor Induction with the Foley Catheter and Double Balloon (cook) Catheter in Women with Unfavorable Cervix\",\"authors\":\"Hossam M Abdelnaby, Hussin M Abdeldayem, E. F. Gerbash, M. Harira, M. Lashin, A. Abdou\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2161-0932.1000474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of single- and double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor among women with an unripe cervix. Study design: This prospective randomize interventional study was performed in emergency department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagazig University and ELGALAA maternity hospitals during the period from 6/2017 till 2/2018. In this study (180 patients) who fulfill inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled and were divided into two main groups; single and double balloon group. Each group included equal number of prim gravida and multigravida. Result Of 180 pregnant women recruited in this study 160 continued till the end of the study. Pain encountered by using visual analogue scale during the catheter insertion the mean pain perception during catheter insertion was 3.3 ± 2.3 in the Foley catheter group and 3.1 ± 2.47 in the Cook catheter group. In the Foley catheter group there were significantly more spontaneous expulsions of the balloon compared with the Cook balloon group. In the Foley catheter group 82.2% of them delivered vaginally and 17.8% delivered by caesarean section. In cook catheter group 80% of them delivered vaginally and 18% delivered by caesarean section. Regarding maternal complications There were 4 cases of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), 3 of them were atonic PPH, and only one case with traumatic PPH due to cervical tear in the Cook catheter group and in foley catheter group there were 3 cases of postpartum hemorrhage all of them atonic postpartum. Conclusion: There is significant difference between the two groups regarding Bishop Score after the balloon catheter expulsion or removal and it was significantly higher in the Cook cervical ripening balloon group, but only in the nulliparous group. Putting in mind that the Foley catheter is cheaper than double balloon catheter and at least as effective as Cook catheter or even better, it is recommended to use Foley catheter in induction of labor instead of double balloon catheter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0932.1000474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较单球囊导管和双球囊导管在宫颈未成熟妇女引产中的效果。研究设计:本前瞻性随机介入研究于2017年6月至2018年2月在扎加齐格大学妇产科急诊科和ELGALAA妇产医院进行。本研究纳入了符合纳入和排除标准的180例患者,并将其分为两组;单和双气囊组。每组包括相同数量的初孕期和多孕期孕妇。结果在本研究招募的180名孕妇中,160名一直持续到研究结束。采用视觉模拟评分法对置管过程中的疼痛感进行评分,Foley置管组置管过程中的平均疼痛感为3.3±2.3,Cook置管组置管过程中的平均疼痛感为3.1±2.47。与Cook球囊组相比,Foley导尿管组有更多的自发球囊排出。Foley导尿管组经阴道分娩占82.2%,剖宫产占17.8%。导尿管组经阴道分娩占80%,剖宫产占18%。产妇并发症:产后出血(PPH) 4例,其中3例为无张力性PPH, Cook导管组仅有1例因宫颈撕裂导致外伤性PPH, foley导管组有3例产后出血,均为无张力性产后出血。结论:两组间球囊导管拔出或拔除后Bishop Score有显著性差异,且Cook宫颈成熟球囊组明显高于未产组。考虑到Foley导尿管比双气囊导尿管更便宜,至少与Cook导尿管一样有效,甚至更好,建议在引产时使用Foley导尿管代替双气囊导尿管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study for Labor Induction with the Foley Catheter and Double Balloon (cook) Catheter in Women with Unfavorable Cervix
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of single- and double-balloon catheters for the induction of labor among women with an unripe cervix. Study design: This prospective randomize interventional study was performed in emergency department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zagazig University and ELGALAA maternity hospitals during the period from 6/2017 till 2/2018. In this study (180 patients) who fulfill inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled and were divided into two main groups; single and double balloon group. Each group included equal number of prim gravida and multigravida. Result Of 180 pregnant women recruited in this study 160 continued till the end of the study. Pain encountered by using visual analogue scale during the catheter insertion the mean pain perception during catheter insertion was 3.3 ± 2.3 in the Foley catheter group and 3.1 ± 2.47 in the Cook catheter group. In the Foley catheter group there were significantly more spontaneous expulsions of the balloon compared with the Cook balloon group. In the Foley catheter group 82.2% of them delivered vaginally and 17.8% delivered by caesarean section. In cook catheter group 80% of them delivered vaginally and 18% delivered by caesarean section. Regarding maternal complications There were 4 cases of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), 3 of them were atonic PPH, and only one case with traumatic PPH due to cervical tear in the Cook catheter group and in foley catheter group there were 3 cases of postpartum hemorrhage all of them atonic postpartum. Conclusion: There is significant difference between the two groups regarding Bishop Score after the balloon catheter expulsion or removal and it was significantly higher in the Cook cervical ripening balloon group, but only in the nulliparous group. Putting in mind that the Foley catheter is cheaper than double balloon catheter and at least as effective as Cook catheter or even better, it is recommended to use Foley catheter in induction of labor instead of double balloon catheter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信