网络问卷作为情感注释词典的构建方法——风险降低策略

A. Landowska
{"title":"网络问卷作为情感注释词典的构建方法——风险降低策略","authors":"A. Landowska","doi":"10.1109/ACII.2015.7344605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper concerns credibility of construction methods for affect-annotated lexicons, specifically a web questionnaire is explored and evaluated. Web-based surveys are susceptible to some risks, which might influence credibility of the results, as some participants might perform random clicks or intentionally falsify the responses. The paper explores the risks and proposes some strategies to reduce them. The strategies are supported by their experimental evaluation in the real case of SentiD affect-annotated dictionary construction.","PeriodicalId":6863,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)","volume":"84 1","pages":"421-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Web questionnaire as construction method of affect-annotated lexicon - Risks reduction strategy\",\"authors\":\"A. Landowska\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACII.2015.7344605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper concerns credibility of construction methods for affect-annotated lexicons, specifically a web questionnaire is explored and evaluated. Web-based surveys are susceptible to some risks, which might influence credibility of the results, as some participants might perform random clicks or intentionally falsify the responses. The paper explores the risks and proposes some strategies to reduce them. The strategies are supported by their experimental evaluation in the real case of SentiD affect-annotated dictionary construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"421-427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2015.7344605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2015.7344605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文探讨了情感注释词典构建方法的可信度,并对网络问卷进行了探讨和评价。基于网络的调查容易受到一些风险的影响,这可能会影响结果的可信度,因为一些参与者可能会随机点击或故意伪造回答。本文对风险进行了探讨,并提出了降低风险的策略。这些策略在SentiD情感注释字典构建的实际案例中得到了实验评估的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Web questionnaire as construction method of affect-annotated lexicon - Risks reduction strategy
The paper concerns credibility of construction methods for affect-annotated lexicons, specifically a web questionnaire is explored and evaluated. Web-based surveys are susceptible to some risks, which might influence credibility of the results, as some participants might perform random clicks or intentionally falsify the responses. The paper explores the risks and proposes some strategies to reduce them. The strategies are supported by their experimental evaluation in the real case of SentiD affect-annotated dictionary construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信