在教育领域研究依赖样本和独立样本的标准

Akryam Zhafyarovich Zhafyarov
{"title":"在教育领域研究依赖样本和独立样本的标准","authors":"Akryam Zhafyarovich Zhafyarov","doi":"10.15293/2658-6762.2203.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article is devoted to monitoring the quality of education and continues the research presented in the author’s previous article. The goal of this work is to improve the author's criterion presented in the above mentioned work in two directions: the first is to strengthen its practical applicability; the second is to deepen research, covering all possible manifestations of problems in the field of quantitative characteristics within the education system (academic performance). Materials and Methods. The methodology of solving this problem and achieving the goal is based on the integration of two important areas of science – mathematics and pedagogy, as well as on the new results obtained by the author in the field of research of dependent and independent samples, which together form the basis of the theory of measuring academic performance. Results. The author has formulated the criterion in order to increase its practical applicability. Consequently, half of the tasks on the problem under study are solved by direct application of the criterion. In the field of deepening the research, a second special class of problems has been found which, together with the first, exhausts all the variety of manifestations of the problem under study in the field of dependent and independent samples. In addition, a two-parameter criterion is introduced, contributing to a more objective way of determining a promising educational technology among competing ones and taking into account the chronology of events. The latter is very important due to the fact that many well–known and widely used criteria (Wilcoxon –Mann - Whitney) are \"blind\", give the same result for different pairs (X, Y) and (Y, X) and do not follow the chronological order. The recommendation provided by incompetent researchers to rearrange the samples in pairs is very harmful and leads to falsification of results. Conclusions. The introduction of the author's criterion not only contributes to the selection of a decent educational technology, but also reduces the volume of scientific and methodological material on mathematical statistics serving the education system tenfold. It is justified by the fact that instead of 12-15 criteria containing about 100 rules and formulas, only one criterion can be used. In addition, this criterion does not contain contradictions, restrictions on the number of students and categories, etc.","PeriodicalId":21621,"journal":{"name":"Science for Education Today","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criteria for studying dependent and independent samples in the field of education\",\"authors\":\"Akryam Zhafyarovich Zhafyarov\",\"doi\":\"10.15293/2658-6762.2203.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The article is devoted to monitoring the quality of education and continues the research presented in the author’s previous article. The goal of this work is to improve the author's criterion presented in the above mentioned work in two directions: the first is to strengthen its practical applicability; the second is to deepen research, covering all possible manifestations of problems in the field of quantitative characteristics within the education system (academic performance). Materials and Methods. The methodology of solving this problem and achieving the goal is based on the integration of two important areas of science – mathematics and pedagogy, as well as on the new results obtained by the author in the field of research of dependent and independent samples, which together form the basis of the theory of measuring academic performance. Results. The author has formulated the criterion in order to increase its practical applicability. Consequently, half of the tasks on the problem under study are solved by direct application of the criterion. In the field of deepening the research, a second special class of problems has been found which, together with the first, exhausts all the variety of manifestations of the problem under study in the field of dependent and independent samples. In addition, a two-parameter criterion is introduced, contributing to a more objective way of determining a promising educational technology among competing ones and taking into account the chronology of events. The latter is very important due to the fact that many well–known and widely used criteria (Wilcoxon –Mann - Whitney) are \\\"blind\\\", give the same result for different pairs (X, Y) and (Y, X) and do not follow the chronological order. The recommendation provided by incompetent researchers to rearrange the samples in pairs is very harmful and leads to falsification of results. Conclusions. The introduction of the author's criterion not only contributes to the selection of a decent educational technology, but also reduces the volume of scientific and methodological material on mathematical statistics serving the education system tenfold. It is justified by the fact that instead of 12-15 criteria containing about 100 rules and formulas, only one criterion can be used. In addition, this criterion does not contain contradictions, restrictions on the number of students and categories, etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science for Education Today\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science for Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2203.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science for Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2203.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。这篇文章致力于监测教育质量,并继续作者在上一篇文章中提出的研究。本工作的目标是在两个方向上完善上述工作中提出的作者标准:一是加强其实际适用性;二是深化研究,涵盖教育体系内数量特征(学业成绩)领域所有可能出现的问题表现。材料与方法。解决这一问题和实现这一目标的方法论是建立在数学和教育学这两个重要科学领域的整合基础上的,也是建立在作者在依赖样本和独立样本研究领域取得的新成果的基础上的,它们共同构成了学业成绩测量理论的基础。结果。为了提高该标准的实际适用性,笔者制定了该标准。因此,所研究问题的一半任务可以通过直接应用该准则来解决。在深化研究的领域中,发现了第二类特殊的问题,它与第一类问题一起,穷尽了所研究问题在依赖和独立样本领域的各种表现形式。此外,引入了一个双参数标准,有助于以更客观的方式在竞争中确定有前途的教育技术,并考虑到事件的年表。后者是非常重要的,因为许多众所周知的和广泛使用的标准(Wilcoxon - mann - Whitney)是“盲目的”,对不同的对(X, Y)和(Y, X)给出相同的结果,并且不遵循时间顺序。不称职的研究人员建议将样本成对重新排列是非常有害的,并导致结果的伪造。结论。作者的标准的引入不仅有助于选择一种体面的教育技术,而且还将为教育系统服务的数理统计的科学和方法材料的数量减少了十倍。事实证明,只有一个标准可以使用,而不是包含大约100个规则和公式的12-15个标准。此外,该标准不包含矛盾,限制学生的数量和类别等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criteria for studying dependent and independent samples in the field of education
Introduction. The article is devoted to monitoring the quality of education and continues the research presented in the author’s previous article. The goal of this work is to improve the author's criterion presented in the above mentioned work in two directions: the first is to strengthen its practical applicability; the second is to deepen research, covering all possible manifestations of problems in the field of quantitative characteristics within the education system (academic performance). Materials and Methods. The methodology of solving this problem and achieving the goal is based on the integration of two important areas of science – mathematics and pedagogy, as well as on the new results obtained by the author in the field of research of dependent and independent samples, which together form the basis of the theory of measuring academic performance. Results. The author has formulated the criterion in order to increase its practical applicability. Consequently, half of the tasks on the problem under study are solved by direct application of the criterion. In the field of deepening the research, a second special class of problems has been found which, together with the first, exhausts all the variety of manifestations of the problem under study in the field of dependent and independent samples. In addition, a two-parameter criterion is introduced, contributing to a more objective way of determining a promising educational technology among competing ones and taking into account the chronology of events. The latter is very important due to the fact that many well–known and widely used criteria (Wilcoxon –Mann - Whitney) are "blind", give the same result for different pairs (X, Y) and (Y, X) and do not follow the chronological order. The recommendation provided by incompetent researchers to rearrange the samples in pairs is very harmful and leads to falsification of results. Conclusions. The introduction of the author's criterion not only contributes to the selection of a decent educational technology, but also reduces the volume of scientific and methodological material on mathematical statistics serving the education system tenfold. It is justified by the fact that instead of 12-15 criteria containing about 100 rules and formulas, only one criterion can be used. In addition, this criterion does not contain contradictions, restrictions on the number of students and categories, etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信