高阶递归格式与高阶不动点逻辑的关系

N. Kobayashi, É. Lozes, Florian Bruse
{"title":"高阶递归格式与高阶不动点逻辑的关系","authors":"N. Kobayashi, É. Lozes, Florian Bruse","doi":"10.1145/3009837.3009854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the relationship between two kinds of higher-order extensions of model checking: HORS model checking, where models are extended to higher-order recursion schemes, and HFL model checking, where the logic is extedned to higher-order modal fixpoint logic. Those extensions have been independently studied until recently, and the former has been applied to higher-order program verification. We show that there exist (arguably) natural reductions between the two problems. To prove the correctness of the translation from HORS to HFL model checking, we establish a type-based characterization of HFL model checking, which should be of independent interest. The results reveal a close relationship between the two problems, enabling cross-fertilization of the two research threads.","PeriodicalId":20657,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 44th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"178 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the relationship between higher-order recursion schemes and higher-order fixpoint logic\",\"authors\":\"N. Kobayashi, É. Lozes, Florian Bruse\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3009837.3009854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the relationship between two kinds of higher-order extensions of model checking: HORS model checking, where models are extended to higher-order recursion schemes, and HFL model checking, where the logic is extedned to higher-order modal fixpoint logic. Those extensions have been independently studied until recently, and the former has been applied to higher-order program verification. We show that there exist (arguably) natural reductions between the two problems. To prove the correctness of the translation from HORS to HFL model checking, we establish a type-based characterization of HFL model checking, which should be of independent interest. The results reveal a close relationship between the two problems, enabling cross-fertilization of the two research threads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 44th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages\",\"volume\":\"178 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 44th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3009837.3009854\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 44th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3009837.3009854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

研究了模型检验的两种高阶扩展之间的关系:HORS模型检验,其中模型扩展到高阶递归格式,HFL模型检验,其中逻辑扩展到高阶模态不动点逻辑。这些扩展直到最近才被独立研究,前者已应用于高阶程序验证。我们表明,这两个问题之间存在(可论证的)自然缩减。为了证明从HORS到HFL模型检查的转换的正确性,我们建立了HFL模型检查的基于类型的表征,这应该是一个独立的兴趣。结果揭示了这两个问题之间的密切关系,使两个研究线程能够交叉受精。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the relationship between higher-order recursion schemes and higher-order fixpoint logic
We study the relationship between two kinds of higher-order extensions of model checking: HORS model checking, where models are extended to higher-order recursion schemes, and HFL model checking, where the logic is extedned to higher-order modal fixpoint logic. Those extensions have been independently studied until recently, and the former has been applied to higher-order program verification. We show that there exist (arguably) natural reductions between the two problems. To prove the correctness of the translation from HORS to HFL model checking, we establish a type-based characterization of HFL model checking, which should be of independent interest. The results reveal a close relationship between the two problems, enabling cross-fertilization of the two research threads.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信