高中学生在学术上作弊的差异在于他们的性别和专业

Rizka Ariyanti Razak
{"title":"高中学生在学术上作弊的差异在于他们的性别和专业","authors":"Rizka Ariyanti Razak","doi":"10.24114/konseling.v20i1.22843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic cheating is one of the phenomena that occur in the world of education. Many factors can affect academic cheating including internal, external, and demographics. This study aims to determine differences in academic cheating in terms of demographic factor (gender and schools majors) in high school. Subjects of this study (N = 86) were second-grade students from one of the public high school in Surabaya. Data collection techniques using non-probability sampling. The research method uses comparative quantitative, namely the Mann-Whitney U Test on gender variables and the Kruskall-Wallis test on school majors variables.The results of the Mann-Whitney U Test analysis showed that the significant value was 0.238 and the Kruskal-Wallis test results showed a significant value of 0.229.These results have a significance value greater than 0.05 (p> 0.05) which means there is no difference in academic cheating in terms of gender and school majors. Gender differences and school majors do not guarantee students not to commit academic cheating because the students has the same pressure to get high grades on subjects. This is also supported by the environment that implements the performance goal orientation.","PeriodicalId":31376,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perbedaan Kecurangan Akademis Siswa SMA ditinjau dari Jenis Kelamin dan Jurusan Sekolah\",\"authors\":\"Rizka Ariyanti Razak\",\"doi\":\"10.24114/konseling.v20i1.22843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic cheating is one of the phenomena that occur in the world of education. Many factors can affect academic cheating including internal, external, and demographics. This study aims to determine differences in academic cheating in terms of demographic factor (gender and schools majors) in high school. Subjects of this study (N = 86) were second-grade students from one of the public high school in Surabaya. Data collection techniques using non-probability sampling. The research method uses comparative quantitative, namely the Mann-Whitney U Test on gender variables and the Kruskall-Wallis test on school majors variables.The results of the Mann-Whitney U Test analysis showed that the significant value was 0.238 and the Kruskal-Wallis test results showed a significant value of 0.229.These results have a significance value greater than 0.05 (p> 0.05) which means there is no difference in academic cheating in terms of gender and school majors. Gender differences and school majors do not guarantee students not to commit academic cheating because the students has the same pressure to get high grades on subjects. This is also supported by the environment that implements the performance goal orientation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24114/konseling.v20i1.22843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/konseling.v20i1.22843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术作弊是教育界普遍存在的现象之一。影响学术作弊的因素有很多,包括内部因素、外部因素和人口统计因素。本研究旨在根据人口统计学因素(性别和学校专业)确定高中学业作弊的差异。本研究的对象为泗水市一所公立高中的二年级学生(N = 86)。使用非概率抽样的数据收集技术。研究方法采用比较定量,即性别变量采用Mann-Whitney U检验,学校专业变量采用Kruskall-Wallis检验。Mann-Whitney U检验分析结果显示显著值为0.238,Kruskal-Wallis检验结果显示显著值为0.229。这些结果的显著性值大于0.05 (p> 0.05),这意味着学业作弊在性别和学校专业上没有差异。性别差异和学校专业并不能保证学生不作弊,因为学生们都有同样的压力,要在科目上取得高分。实现性能目标导向的环境也支持这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perbedaan Kecurangan Akademis Siswa SMA ditinjau dari Jenis Kelamin dan Jurusan Sekolah
Academic cheating is one of the phenomena that occur in the world of education. Many factors can affect academic cheating including internal, external, and demographics. This study aims to determine differences in academic cheating in terms of demographic factor (gender and schools majors) in high school. Subjects of this study (N = 86) were second-grade students from one of the public high school in Surabaya. Data collection techniques using non-probability sampling. The research method uses comparative quantitative, namely the Mann-Whitney U Test on gender variables and the Kruskall-Wallis test on school majors variables.The results of the Mann-Whitney U Test analysis showed that the significant value was 0.238 and the Kruskal-Wallis test results showed a significant value of 0.229.These results have a significance value greater than 0.05 (p> 0.05) which means there is no difference in academic cheating in terms of gender and school majors. Gender differences and school majors do not guarantee students not to commit academic cheating because the students has the same pressure to get high grades on subjects. This is also supported by the environment that implements the performance goal orientation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信