主要评论:马太福音:评论

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
M. Powell
{"title":"主要评论:马太福音:评论","authors":"M. Powell","doi":"10.1177/00209643221145967a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"although Probably best known for his seminal and creative work on the Gospel of John, R. Alan Culpepper has produced what many preachers and teachers may regard as his magnum opus: a detailed and thorough analysis of Matthew’s Gospel that will become a standard guide to exegetical study for decades to come. Those who are familiar with Culpepper’s Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel (Augsburg Fortress, 1987) should know that he is doing something different here. The book does not offer a literary analysis of Matthew’s narrative with attention to plot lines, characterization, point of view, and the like. This commentary (like others in the New Testament Library series) draws upon traditional methods of historical criticism: textual analysis, redaction criticism, and other strategies for studying ancient texts.","PeriodicalId":44542,"journal":{"name":"INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF BIBLE AND THEOLOGY","volume":"42 1","pages":"190 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Major Review: Matthew: A Commentary\",\"authors\":\"M. Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00209643221145967a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"although Probably best known for his seminal and creative work on the Gospel of John, R. Alan Culpepper has produced what many preachers and teachers may regard as his magnum opus: a detailed and thorough analysis of Matthew’s Gospel that will become a standard guide to exegetical study for decades to come. Those who are familiar with Culpepper’s Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel (Augsburg Fortress, 1987) should know that he is doing something different here. The book does not offer a literary analysis of Matthew’s narrative with attention to plot lines, characterization, point of view, and the like. This commentary (like others in the New Testament Library series) draws upon traditional methods of historical criticism: textual analysis, redaction criticism, and other strategies for studying ancient texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF BIBLE AND THEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"190 - 192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF BIBLE AND THEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00209643221145967a\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF BIBLE AND THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00209643221145967a","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然艾伦·卡尔佩珀最出名的可能是他对约翰福音的开创性和创造性的工作,但他创作了许多传教士和教师可能认为是他的代表作:对马太福音的详细而彻底的分析,将成为未来几十年训诂学研究的标准指南。那些熟悉卡尔佩珀的《第四福音剖析》(奥格斯堡堡垒,1987)的人应该知道,他在这里做了一些不同的事情。这本书并没有对马太的叙述进行文学分析,也没有关注情节主线、人物塑造、观点等。这个注释(像新约图书馆系列的其他注释一样)借鉴了传统的历史批评方法:文本分析、编校批评和其他研究古代文本的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Major Review: Matthew: A Commentary
although Probably best known for his seminal and creative work on the Gospel of John, R. Alan Culpepper has produced what many preachers and teachers may regard as his magnum opus: a detailed and thorough analysis of Matthew’s Gospel that will become a standard guide to exegetical study for decades to come. Those who are familiar with Culpepper’s Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel (Augsburg Fortress, 1987) should know that he is doing something different here. The book does not offer a literary analysis of Matthew’s narrative with attention to plot lines, characterization, point of view, and the like. This commentary (like others in the New Testament Library series) draws upon traditional methods of historical criticism: textual analysis, redaction criticism, and other strategies for studying ancient texts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信