经验

Fathoni A. Musyaffa, C. Engels, Maria-Esther Vidal, F. Orlandi, Sören Auer
{"title":"经验","authors":"Fathoni A. Musyaffa, C. Engels, Maria-Esther Vidal, F. Orlandi, Sören Auer","doi":"10.1145/3190576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public administrations are continuously publishing open data, increasing the amount of government open data over time. The published data includes budgets and spending as part of fiscal data; publishing these data is an important part of transparent and accountable governance. However, open fiscal data should also meet open data publication guidelines. When requirements in data guidelines are not met, effective data analysis over published datasets cannot be performed effectively. In this article, we present Open Fiscal Data Publication (OFDP), a framework to assess the quality of open fiscal datasets. We also present an extensive open fiscal data assessment and common data quality issues found; additionally, open fiscal data publishing guidelines are presented. We studied and surveyed main quality factors for open fiscal datasets. Moreover, the collected quality factors have been scored according to the results of a questionnaire to score quality factors within the OFDP assessment framework. We gather and comprehensively analyze a representative set of 77 fiscal datasets from several public administrations across different regions at different levels (e.g., supranational, national, municipality). We characterize quality issues commonly arising in these datasets. Our assessment shows that there are many quality factors in fiscal data publication that still need to be taken care of so that the data can be analyzed effectively. Our proposed guidelines allow for publishing open fiscal data where these quality issues are avoided.","PeriodicalId":15582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","volume":"12 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience\",\"authors\":\"Fathoni A. Musyaffa, C. Engels, Maria-Esther Vidal, F. Orlandi, Sören Auer\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3190576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public administrations are continuously publishing open data, increasing the amount of government open data over time. The published data includes budgets and spending as part of fiscal data; publishing these data is an important part of transparent and accountable governance. However, open fiscal data should also meet open data publication guidelines. When requirements in data guidelines are not met, effective data analysis over published datasets cannot be performed effectively. In this article, we present Open Fiscal Data Publication (OFDP), a framework to assess the quality of open fiscal datasets. We also present an extensive open fiscal data assessment and common data quality issues found; additionally, open fiscal data publishing guidelines are presented. We studied and surveyed main quality factors for open fiscal datasets. Moreover, the collected quality factors have been scored according to the results of a questionnaire to score quality factors within the OFDP assessment framework. We gather and comprehensively analyze a representative set of 77 fiscal datasets from several public administrations across different regions at different levels (e.g., supranational, national, municipality). We characterize quality issues commonly arising in these datasets. Our assessment shows that there are many quality factors in fiscal data publication that still need to be taken care of so that the data can be analyzed effectively. Our proposed guidelines allow for publishing open fiscal data where these quality issues are avoided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3190576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3190576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

公共管理部门不断发布开放数据,随着时间的推移,政府开放数据的数量不断增加。公布的数据包括预算和支出,作为财政数据的一部分;公布这些数据是透明和负责任的治理的重要组成部分。然而,公开的财政数据也应符合公开数据发布指南。当不满足数据指南的要求时,无法对已发布的数据集进行有效的数据分析。在本文中,我们提出了开放财政数据发布(OFDP),这是一个评估开放财政数据集质量的框架。我们还提出了广泛的公开财政数据评估和发现的常见数据质量问题;此外,还提出了公开财政数据发布指南。我们研究和调查了开放财政数据集的主要质量因素。此外,根据问卷调查结果对收集到的质量因素进行评分,在OFDP评估框架内对质量因素进行评分。我们收集并全面分析了来自不同地区、不同级别(如超国家、国家、直辖市)多个公共行政部门的77个具有代表性的财政数据集。我们描述了这些数据集中常见的质量问题。我们的评估表明,为了有效地分析财政数据,在财政数据发布中仍有许多质量因素需要注意。我们建议的指导方针允许在避免这些质量问题的情况下发布公开的财政数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience
Public administrations are continuously publishing open data, increasing the amount of government open data over time. The published data includes budgets and spending as part of fiscal data; publishing these data is an important part of transparent and accountable governance. However, open fiscal data should also meet open data publication guidelines. When requirements in data guidelines are not met, effective data analysis over published datasets cannot be performed effectively. In this article, we present Open Fiscal Data Publication (OFDP), a framework to assess the quality of open fiscal datasets. We also present an extensive open fiscal data assessment and common data quality issues found; additionally, open fiscal data publishing guidelines are presented. We studied and surveyed main quality factors for open fiscal datasets. Moreover, the collected quality factors have been scored according to the results of a questionnaire to score quality factors within the OFDP assessment framework. We gather and comprehensively analyze a representative set of 77 fiscal datasets from several public administrations across different regions at different levels (e.g., supranational, national, municipality). We characterize quality issues commonly arising in these datasets. Our assessment shows that there are many quality factors in fiscal data publication that still need to be taken care of so that the data can be analyzed effectively. Our proposed guidelines allow for publishing open fiscal data where these quality issues are avoided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信