重新审视自由主义地役权

Ekonomia Spoleczna Pub Date : 2021-12-19 DOI:10.19195/2658-1310.27.1.2

Łukasz M. Dominiak

{"title":"重新审视自由主义地役权","authors":"Łukasz M. Dominiak","doi":"10.19195/2658-1310.27.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present paper, I develop further my original argument for extending the Blockian Proviso to landlocked property. I use Walter Block’s newest rejoinder as an opportunity to generalize my case for necessity easements. I argue that in order to attenuate various conﬂicts of rights, libertarianism should interpret its thesis that property rights are absolute in a less demanding way.","PeriodicalId":34121,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomia Spoleczna","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Libertarian easements revisited\",\"authors\":\"Łukasz M. Dominiak\",\"doi\":\"10.19195/2658-1310.27.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present paper, I develop further my original argument for extending the Blockian Proviso to landlocked property. I use Walter Block’s newest rejoinder as an opportunity to generalize my case for necessity easements. I argue that in order to attenuate various conﬂicts of rights, libertarianism should interpret its thesis that property rights are absolute in a less demanding way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekonomia Spoleczna\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekonomia Spoleczna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.27.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomia Spoleczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.27.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中，我进一步发展了我最初的论点，将布洛克但书扩展到内陆财产。我利用沃尔特·布洛克最新的反驳来概括我对紧急地役权的看法。我认为，为了减少各种权利冲突，自由意志主义应该以一种不那么苛刻的方式来解释其财产权是绝对的论点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Libertarian easements revisited

In the present paper, I develop further my original argument for extending the Blockian Proviso to landlocked property. I use Walter Block’s newest rejoinder as an opportunity to generalize my case for necessity easements. I argue that in order to attenuate various conﬂicts of rights, libertarianism should interpret its thesis that property rights are absolute in a less demanding way.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ekonomia Spoleczna

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks