社会网络干预对轻度至边缘性智障人士的评估

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2016-12-21 DOI:10.1111/jar.12318

A. E. van Asselt-Goverts, P. J. C. M. Embregts, A. H. C. Hendriks

{"title":"社会网络干预对轻度至边缘性智障人士的评估","authors":"A. E. van Asselt-Goverts, P. J. C. M. Embregts, A. H. C. Hendriks","doi":"10.1111/jar.12318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Little is known about the effectiveness of interventions aimed at enhancing the social networks of people with intellectual disabilities. This study explores the results of such an intervention. How did the clients with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities and their support workers evaluate the intervention? What did they learn from it? Were there any changes in network characteristics, satisfaction and wishes in relation to networks, participation, loneliness, self-determination or self-esteem?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The evaluation of the intervention was explored from several perspectives (i.e. five clients, their six support workers and three trainers), using mixed methods (i.e. interviews and questionnaires).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The intervention was positively evaluated by both clients and support workers. Moreover, the analysis revealed the vulnerability of clients and their networks but also the benefits experienced from the intervention, such as decreased loneliness, enhanced social networks, increased awareness, competence, autonomy and increased participation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The indicative level of evidence for the effectiveness of this intervention justifies a larger series of case studies or a larger control trial study.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"31 2","pages":"e229-e243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12318","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a Social Network Intervention for People with Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"A. E. van Asselt-Goverts, P. J. C. M. Embregts, A. H. C. Hendriks\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.12318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Little is known about the effectiveness of interventions aimed at enhancing the social networks of people with intellectual disabilities. This study explores the results of such an intervention. How did the clients with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities and their support workers evaluate the intervention? What did they learn from it? Were there any changes in network characteristics, satisfaction and wishes in relation to networks, participation, loneliness, self-determination or self-esteem?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The evaluation of the intervention was explored from several perspectives (i.e. five clients, their six support workers and three trainers), using mixed methods (i.e. interviews and questionnaires).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The intervention was positively evaluated by both clients and support workers. Moreover, the analysis revealed the vulnerability of clients and their networks but also the benefits experienced from the intervention, such as decreased loneliness, enhanced social networks, increased awareness, competence, autonomy and increased participation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The indicative level of evidence for the effectiveness of this intervention justifies a larger series of case studies or a larger control trial study.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"e229-e243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jar.12318\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.12318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.12318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

摘要

关于旨在加强智障人士社会网络的干预措施的有效性，我们所知甚少。本研究探讨了这种干预的结果。轻度至边缘性智力障碍患者及其支持人员如何评价干预措施?他们从中学到了什么?与网络、参与、孤独、自我决定或自尊相关的网络特征、满意度和愿望有什么变化吗?方法采用访谈和问卷调查相结合的方法，从5名来访者、6名支持工作者和3名培训师三个角度对干预措施进行评价。结果来访者和支持工作者对干预均给予积极评价。此外，分析揭示了客户及其网络的脆弱性，但也揭示了干预带来的好处，例如减少孤独感，增强社会网络，提高意识，能力，自主性和参与度。结论:该干预措施有效性的指示性证据水平证明需要进行更大规模的病例研究或更大规模的对照试验研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluation of a Social Network Intervention for People with Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities

Background

Little is known about the effectiveness of interventions aimed at enhancing the social networks of people with intellectual disabilities. This study explores the results of such an intervention. How did the clients with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities and their support workers evaluate the intervention? What did they learn from it? Were there any changes in network characteristics, satisfaction and wishes in relation to networks, participation, loneliness, self-determination or self-esteem?

Method

The evaluation of the intervention was explored from several perspectives (i.e. five clients, their six support workers and three trainers), using mixed methods (i.e. interviews and questionnaires).

Results

The intervention was positively evaluated by both clients and support workers. Moreover, the analysis revealed the vulnerability of clients and their networks but also the benefits experienced from the intervention, such as decreased loneliness, enhanced social networks, increased awareness, competence, autonomy and increased participation.

Conclusion

The indicative level of evidence for the effectiveness of this intervention justifies a larger series of case studies or a larger control trial study.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.