客户-治疗师“匹配”的不可能性:多元文化能力的含义和未来方向

Melissa M. Ertl, Michelle Mann-Saumier, Renee A. Martin, D. Graves, J. Altarriba
{"title":"客户-治疗师“匹配”的不可能性:多元文化能力的含义和未来方向","authors":"Melissa M. Ertl, Michelle Mann-Saumier, Renee A. Martin, D. Graves, J. Altarriba","doi":"10.17744/mehc.41.4.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive research has examined the influence of client–therapist racial, ethnic, or cultural match on outcomes in therapy. Further, many narrative reviews have summarized the literature in this area, and several meta-analytic reviews have examined the strength of the influence of client–therapist match. The present narrative review builds on previous studies by discussing several critical issues in this literature. In particular, we add to the extant literature reviews by contextualizing the challenges of defining and measuring client–therapist match given the possible broad range of diverse intersectional identities. As matching is not always possible, recommendations for working with clients of a different cultural background are discussed. Suggestions for multicultural competence training are included. We also provide a case example of how intersectionality of identities can inform the therapeutic context. The current article provides updated insights into the client–therapist match literature and emphasizes specific recommendations for education, training, and supervision.","PeriodicalId":90224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health counseling","volume":"250 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impossibility of Client–Therapist “Match”: Implications and Future Directions for Multicultural Competency\",\"authors\":\"Melissa M. Ertl, Michelle Mann-Saumier, Renee A. Martin, D. Graves, J. Altarriba\",\"doi\":\"10.17744/mehc.41.4.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Extensive research has examined the influence of client–therapist racial, ethnic, or cultural match on outcomes in therapy. Further, many narrative reviews have summarized the literature in this area, and several meta-analytic reviews have examined the strength of the influence of client–therapist match. The present narrative review builds on previous studies by discussing several critical issues in this literature. In particular, we add to the extant literature reviews by contextualizing the challenges of defining and measuring client–therapist match given the possible broad range of diverse intersectional identities. As matching is not always possible, recommendations for working with clients of a different cultural background are discussed. Suggestions for multicultural competence training are included. We also provide a case example of how intersectionality of identities can inform the therapeutic context. The current article provides updated insights into the client–therapist match literature and emphasizes specific recommendations for education, training, and supervision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mental health counseling\",\"volume\":\"250 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mental health counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.41.4.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health counseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.41.4.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

广泛的研究已经检验了客户-治疗师种族、民族或文化匹配对治疗结果的影响。此外,许多叙述性评论总结了这一领域的文献,一些元分析评论检查了客户-治疗师匹配的影响强度。目前的叙述性审查建立在以前的研究,讨论几个关键问题在这一文献。特别是,我们通过将定义和测量客户-治疗师匹配的挑战置于背景中,从而增加了现有的文献综述,因为可能存在广泛的不同交叉身份。由于不可能总是匹配,因此讨论了与不同文化背景的客户合作的建议。对多元文化能力的培养提出了建议。我们还提供了一个案例,说明身份的交叉性如何能够告知治疗背景。当前的文章提供了对客户-治疗师匹配文献的最新见解,并强调了对教育、培训和监督的具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impossibility of Client–Therapist “Match”: Implications and Future Directions for Multicultural Competency
Extensive research has examined the influence of client–therapist racial, ethnic, or cultural match on outcomes in therapy. Further, many narrative reviews have summarized the literature in this area, and several meta-analytic reviews have examined the strength of the influence of client–therapist match. The present narrative review builds on previous studies by discussing several critical issues in this literature. In particular, we add to the extant literature reviews by contextualizing the challenges of defining and measuring client–therapist match given the possible broad range of diverse intersectional identities. As matching is not always possible, recommendations for working with clients of a different cultural background are discussed. Suggestions for multicultural competence training are included. We also provide a case example of how intersectionality of identities can inform the therapeutic context. The current article provides updated insights into the client–therapist match literature and emphasizes specific recommendations for education, training, and supervision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信