幼儿史学?论教育史研究的矛盾与悖论

IF 0.3 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Depaepe
{"title":"幼儿史学?论教育史研究的矛盾与悖论","authors":"M. Depaepe","doi":"10.1080/00309230.2022.2130702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present epilogue, concluding a special issue on the development of our field in lesser-known geographical contexts, takes the opportunity to air some of the author’s personal views. After all, with the publication of this issue, his years as editor of Paedagogica Historica are over. In a sense, therefore, the reflections brought here are somewhat his spiritual testament, even if this is put into perspective from the outset by the author himself. Indeed, the article reiterates some positions already taken in the past, such as the idea that, by drawing “lessons” from the educational heritage, the discipline of history of education need not necessarily be made more relevant and/or topical in order to reclaim its place in the training of teachers and pedagogues. Rather, Depaepe argues in this context for staying in line with cultural-historically conceived research on educational history, even if this marginalises the discipline even more at the expense of so-called more efficient study domains. Nevertheless, the message proclaimed here remains, all in all, hopeful. Only insights on the basis of pedagogical historiography can sufficiently open the way to nuance and put into perspective contemporary discussions, debates, disagreements, tensions, conflicts and so on. That is why Depaepe ends on a positive note. In his words, “hope and realism: it seems old-fashioned, but unfortunately, in all these years I have not found better tools for a respectful, sincere and unbiased approach to the educational past“.","PeriodicalId":46283,"journal":{"name":"PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA","volume":"47 1","pages":"974 - 985"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paedagogica historica, quo vadis? An epilogue on the ambivalences and paradoxes of doing educational history\",\"authors\":\"M. Depaepe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00309230.2022.2130702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The present epilogue, concluding a special issue on the development of our field in lesser-known geographical contexts, takes the opportunity to air some of the author’s personal views. After all, with the publication of this issue, his years as editor of Paedagogica Historica are over. In a sense, therefore, the reflections brought here are somewhat his spiritual testament, even if this is put into perspective from the outset by the author himself. Indeed, the article reiterates some positions already taken in the past, such as the idea that, by drawing “lessons” from the educational heritage, the discipline of history of education need not necessarily be made more relevant and/or topical in order to reclaim its place in the training of teachers and pedagogues. Rather, Depaepe argues in this context for staying in line with cultural-historically conceived research on educational history, even if this marginalises the discipline even more at the expense of so-called more efficient study domains. Nevertheless, the message proclaimed here remains, all in all, hopeful. Only insights on the basis of pedagogical historiography can sufficiently open the way to nuance and put into perspective contemporary discussions, debates, disagreements, tensions, conflicts and so on. That is why Depaepe ends on a positive note. In his words, “hope and realism: it seems old-fashioned, but unfortunately, in all these years I have not found better tools for a respectful, sincere and unbiased approach to the educational past“.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"974 - 985\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2022.2130702\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAEDAGOGICA HISTORICA","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2022.2130702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的结语是关于我们这个领域在鲜为人知的地理背景下的发展的一个专题,借此机会提出作者的一些个人观点。毕竟,随着这一期的出版,他作为《历史幼儿》编辑的岁月结束了。因此,从某种意义上说,这里带来的反思在某种程度上是他的精神遗嘱,即使这是从作者自己开始的角度来看的。事实上,这篇文章重申了过去已经采取的一些立场,例如,通过从教育遗产中吸取“教训”,教育史学科不一定需要变得更相关和/或更热门,以便在教师和教育工作者的培训中重新占据一席之地。相反,在这种背景下,Depaepe主张保持与文化历史观念的教育史研究一致,即使这以牺牲所谓更有效的研究领域为代价,使该学科更加边缘化。然而,总的说来,这里所宣布的信息仍然是充满希望的。只有建立在教育学史学基础上的洞见,才能充分地为细微差别开辟道路,并对当代的讨论、辩论、分歧、紧张、冲突等进行透视。这就是为什么戴佩佩以积极的态度结束。用他的话说,“希望和现实主义:这似乎过时了,但不幸的是,这些年来,我没有找到更好的工具,以一种尊重、真诚和公正的方式来看待教育的过去”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paedagogica historica, quo vadis? An epilogue on the ambivalences and paradoxes of doing educational history
ABSTRACT The present epilogue, concluding a special issue on the development of our field in lesser-known geographical contexts, takes the opportunity to air some of the author’s personal views. After all, with the publication of this issue, his years as editor of Paedagogica Historica are over. In a sense, therefore, the reflections brought here are somewhat his spiritual testament, even if this is put into perspective from the outset by the author himself. Indeed, the article reiterates some positions already taken in the past, such as the idea that, by drawing “lessons” from the educational heritage, the discipline of history of education need not necessarily be made more relevant and/or topical in order to reclaim its place in the training of teachers and pedagogues. Rather, Depaepe argues in this context for staying in line with cultural-historically conceived research on educational history, even if this marginalises the discipline even more at the expense of so-called more efficient study domains. Nevertheless, the message proclaimed here remains, all in all, hopeful. Only insights on the basis of pedagogical historiography can sufficiently open the way to nuance and put into perspective contemporary discussions, debates, disagreements, tensions, conflicts and so on. That is why Depaepe ends on a positive note. In his words, “hope and realism: it seems old-fashioned, but unfortunately, in all these years I have not found better tools for a respectful, sincere and unbiased approach to the educational past“.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
40.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: "Paedagogica Historica is undoubtedly the leading journal in the field. In contrast to a series of national journals for the history of education, Paedagogica Historica is the most international one." A trilingual journal with European roots, Paedagogica Historica discusses global education issues from an historical perspective. Topics include: •Childhood and Youth •Comparative and International Education •Cultural and social policy •Curriculum •Education reform •Historiography •Schooling •Teachers •Textbooks •Theory and Methodology •The urban and rural school environment •Women and gender issues in Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信