国外和美国煤炭在北大西洋市场的竞争成本

Robert J. Schneid , Thomas F. Torries
{"title":"国外和美国煤炭在北大西洋市场的竞争成本","authors":"Robert J. Schneid ,&nbsp;Thomas F. Torries","doi":"10.1016/0167-9031(91)90296-O","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Costs of using coal from the eastern United States, Australia, Colombia and South Africa by electric utilities in the coastal areas of eastern United States and Europe are determined on a comparative cost basis and analyzed. Costs considered include coal production and transportation costs and cost to the electric utilities, determined by differences in coal quality (i.e., heat, ash and sulfur content). Estimated costs and shadow prices are determined and compared with actual prices.</p><p>Differences in determined costs indicate that United States high sulfur coal will be uncompetitive in all scenarios investigated, United States low sulfur coal will be competitive under certain circumstances, and that potential economic rents may accrue to coal producers in Colombia, Australia and South Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100929,"journal":{"name":"Mining Science and Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 89-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-9031(91)90296-O","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitive costs of foreign and U.S. coal in North Atlantic markets\",\"authors\":\"Robert J. Schneid ,&nbsp;Thomas F. Torries\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0167-9031(91)90296-O\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Costs of using coal from the eastern United States, Australia, Colombia and South Africa by electric utilities in the coastal areas of eastern United States and Europe are determined on a comparative cost basis and analyzed. Costs considered include coal production and transportation costs and cost to the electric utilities, determined by differences in coal quality (i.e., heat, ash and sulfur content). Estimated costs and shadow prices are determined and compared with actual prices.</p><p>Differences in determined costs indicate that United States high sulfur coal will be uncompetitive in all scenarios investigated, United States low sulfur coal will be competitive under certain circumstances, and that potential economic rents may accrue to coal producers in Colombia, Australia and South Africa.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mining Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 89-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-9031(91)90296-O\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mining Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016790319190296O\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016790319190296O","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

美国东部和欧洲沿海地区的电力公司使用来自美国东部、澳大利亚、哥伦比亚和南非的煤炭的成本是根据比较成本确定和分析的。所考虑的成本包括煤炭生产和运输成本以及电力公用事业的成本,这取决于煤炭质量(即热量、灰分和硫含量)的差异。估算成本和影子价格被确定并与实际价格进行比较。确定成本的差异表明,美国高硫煤在调查的所有情况下都不具有竞争力,美国低硫煤在某些情况下具有竞争力,哥伦比亚、澳大利亚和南非的煤炭生产商可能获得潜在的经济租金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competitive costs of foreign and U.S. coal in North Atlantic markets

Costs of using coal from the eastern United States, Australia, Colombia and South Africa by electric utilities in the coastal areas of eastern United States and Europe are determined on a comparative cost basis and analyzed. Costs considered include coal production and transportation costs and cost to the electric utilities, determined by differences in coal quality (i.e., heat, ash and sulfur content). Estimated costs and shadow prices are determined and compared with actual prices.

Differences in determined costs indicate that United States high sulfur coal will be uncompetitive in all scenarios investigated, United States low sulfur coal will be competitive under certain circumstances, and that potential economic rents may accrue to coal producers in Colombia, Australia and South Africa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信