富血小板血浆治疗脊髓损伤的效果:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Amirmohammad Toloui, Hamzah Adel Ramawad, Nahid Aboutaleb, Mahmoud Yousefifard
{"title":"富血小板血浆治疗脊髓损伤的效果:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Amirmohammad Toloui, Hamzah Adel Ramawad, Nahid Aboutaleb, Mahmoud Yousefifard","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2023.562.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to investigate platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an effective treatment for spinal cord injury in animal models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases. The included studies were summarized based on the investigated outcomes, including functional recovery and cavity size. Data were recorded as Mean±SD. The relationships between variables and the outcomes were investigated based on the \"meta\" command in the STATA 17.0 statistical program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 9 articles were included in the present meta-analysis. Pooled data analysis showed that administrating PRP significantly improved the motor function of animals (standardized mean differences [SMD]=1.5; 95% CI, 0.9%, 2.1%; P<0.0001). In subgroup analysis based on the severity of the injury, PRP administration significantly improved the motor function of animals in both moderate (SMD=2.59; 95% CI, 1.59%, 3.59%; P<0.0001; I<sup>2</sup>=30.22%) and severe injuries (SMD=1.22; 95% CI, 0.64%, 1.79%; P<0.0001; I<sup>2</sup>=56.35%). However, the recovery of function was significantly more in animals with moderate spinal cord injury (meta-regression coefficient=-1.36; 95% CI, -2.68%, -0.09%; P=0.035). In assessing cavity size, pooled data analysis showed that PRP administration significantly reduces cavity size (SMD=-2.2; 95% CI, -3.44%, -0.95%; P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis shows that PRP can significantly improve motor function and reduce the cavity size in animals with moderate to severe spinal cord injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"189 1","pages":"443-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Platelet-rich Plasma in Treating Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review & Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Amirmohammad Toloui, Hamzah Adel Ramawad, Nahid Aboutaleb, Mahmoud Yousefifard\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/bcn.2023.562.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The present systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to investigate platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an effective treatment for spinal cord injury in animal models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases. The included studies were summarized based on the investigated outcomes, including functional recovery and cavity size. Data were recorded as Mean±SD. The relationships between variables and the outcomes were investigated based on the \\\"meta\\\" command in the STATA 17.0 statistical program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 9 articles were included in the present meta-analysis. Pooled data analysis showed that administrating PRP significantly improved the motor function of animals (standardized mean differences [SMD]=1.5; 95% CI, 0.9%, 2.1%; P<0.0001). In subgroup analysis based on the severity of the injury, PRP administration significantly improved the motor function of animals in both moderate (SMD=2.59; 95% CI, 1.59%, 3.59%; P<0.0001; I<sup>2</sup>=30.22%) and severe injuries (SMD=1.22; 95% CI, 0.64%, 1.79%; P<0.0001; I<sup>2</sup>=56.35%). However, the recovery of function was significantly more in animals with moderate spinal cord injury (meta-regression coefficient=-1.36; 95% CI, -2.68%, -0.09%; P=0.035). In assessing cavity size, pooled data analysis showed that PRP administration significantly reduces cavity size (SMD=-2.2; 95% CI, -3.44%, -0.95%; P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis shows that PRP can significantly improve motor function and reduce the cavity size in animals with moderate to severe spinal cord injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"volume\":\"189 1\",\"pages\":\"443-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565662/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2023.562.2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2023.562.2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究富血小板血浆(PRP)作为脊髓损伤动物模型的有效治疗方法:方法:使用电子数据库进行了广泛的文献检索。方法:通过电子数据库进行了广泛的文献检索,并根据研究结果(包括功能恢复和腔隙大小)对纳入的研究进行了总结。数据记录为平均值±SD。根据 STATA 17.0 统计程序中的 "meta "命令,研究变量与结果之间的关系:本荟萃分析共纳入 9 篇文章。汇总数据分析显示,施用 PRP 能显著改善动物(标准化平均差 [SMD]=1.5; 95% CI, 0.9%, 2.1%; P2=30.22%)和严重损伤(SMD=1.22; 95% CI, 0.64%, 1.79%; P2=56.35%)的运动功能。然而,中度脊髓损伤动物的功能恢复明显较好(元回归系数=-1.36;95% CI,-2.68%,-0.09%;P=0.035)。在评估空腔大小时,汇总数据分析显示,给予 PRP 可显著缩小空腔大小(SMD=-2.2;95% CI,-3.44%,-0.95%;P=0.035):这项荟萃分析表明,PRP能明显改善中度至重度脊髓损伤动物的运动功能并缩小脊髓空洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Platelet-rich Plasma in Treating Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review & Meta-analysis.

Introduction: The present systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to investigate platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an effective treatment for spinal cord injury in animal models.

Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted using electronic databases. The included studies were summarized based on the investigated outcomes, including functional recovery and cavity size. Data were recorded as Mean±SD. The relationships between variables and the outcomes were investigated based on the "meta" command in the STATA 17.0 statistical program.

Results: In total, 9 articles were included in the present meta-analysis. Pooled data analysis showed that administrating PRP significantly improved the motor function of animals (standardized mean differences [SMD]=1.5; 95% CI, 0.9%, 2.1%; P<0.0001). In subgroup analysis based on the severity of the injury, PRP administration significantly improved the motor function of animals in both moderate (SMD=2.59; 95% CI, 1.59%, 3.59%; P<0.0001; I2=30.22%) and severe injuries (SMD=1.22; 95% CI, 0.64%, 1.79%; P<0.0001; I2=56.35%). However, the recovery of function was significantly more in animals with moderate spinal cord injury (meta-regression coefficient=-1.36; 95% CI, -2.68%, -0.09%; P=0.035). In assessing cavity size, pooled data analysis showed that PRP administration significantly reduces cavity size (SMD=-2.2; 95% CI, -3.44%, -0.95%; P<0.0001).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that PRP can significantly improve motor function and reduce the cavity size in animals with moderate to severe spinal cord injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信