通过参与全面的二年级课程,提高学生的保留率

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. McDaniel, Leah R. Halper, Matthew Van Jura, Beth Fines, M. Whittington
{"title":"通过参与全面的二年级课程,提高学生的保留率","authors":"A. McDaniel, Leah R. Halper, Matthew Van Jura, Beth Fines, M. Whittington","doi":"10.1177/15210251221084622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The second year of college is a time when students remain at increased risk of departure. Compared to widely available first-year resources, institutional support for second-year students is more limited. The purpose of this study was to compare second-to-third year retention between students who participated in a comprehensive second-year experience program (SEP; n = 2,622) with students who did not participate ( n = 4,823). Because students’ participation in SEP was optional, we used propensity score matching to account for potential selection bias. Students who participated in SEP were retained at higher rates than students who did not participate, even when accounting for potential selection bias. Retention differences were especially notable among participants and nonparticipants from systemically minoritized backgrounds. These findings extend prior research that meaningful involvement in high-impact practices supports second-year students’ retention. We conclude with implications for leaders responsible for second-year programing on their campus.","PeriodicalId":47066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Student Retention-Research Theory & Practice","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing Student Retention Rates Through Engagement in a Comprehensive Second-Year Program\",\"authors\":\"A. McDaniel, Leah R. Halper, Matthew Van Jura, Beth Fines, M. Whittington\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15210251221084622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The second year of college is a time when students remain at increased risk of departure. Compared to widely available first-year resources, institutional support for second-year students is more limited. The purpose of this study was to compare second-to-third year retention between students who participated in a comprehensive second-year experience program (SEP; n = 2,622) with students who did not participate ( n = 4,823). Because students’ participation in SEP was optional, we used propensity score matching to account for potential selection bias. Students who participated in SEP were retained at higher rates than students who did not participate, even when accounting for potential selection bias. Retention differences were especially notable among participants and nonparticipants from systemically minoritized backgrounds. These findings extend prior research that meaningful involvement in high-impact practices supports second-year students’ retention. We conclude with implications for leaders responsible for second-year programing on their campus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Student Retention-Research Theory & Practice\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Student Retention-Research Theory & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251221084622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Student Retention-Research Theory & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251221084622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大学第二年是学生离开的风险增加的时期。与广泛可用的一年级资源相比,机构对二年级学生的支持更为有限。本研究的目的是比较参加综合二年级体验计划(SEP;N = 2,622)和未参与的学生(N = 4,823)。由于学生参与SEP是可选的,我们使用倾向得分匹配来解释潜在的选择偏差。即使考虑到潜在的选择偏差,参加SEP的学生比没有参加SEP的学生保留率更高。在系统少数族裔背景的参与者和非参与者之间,记忆力的差异尤其显著。这些发现扩展了先前的研究,即有意义的参与高影响的实践支持二年级学生的保留。我们总结了对负责校园二年级课程的领导者的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing Student Retention Rates Through Engagement in a Comprehensive Second-Year Program
The second year of college is a time when students remain at increased risk of departure. Compared to widely available first-year resources, institutional support for second-year students is more limited. The purpose of this study was to compare second-to-third year retention between students who participated in a comprehensive second-year experience program (SEP; n = 2,622) with students who did not participate ( n = 4,823). Because students’ participation in SEP was optional, we used propensity score matching to account for potential selection bias. Students who participated in SEP were retained at higher rates than students who did not participate, even when accounting for potential selection bias. Retention differences were especially notable among participants and nonparticipants from systemically minoritized backgrounds. These findings extend prior research that meaningful involvement in high-impact practices supports second-year students’ retention. We conclude with implications for leaders responsible for second-year programing on their campus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信