{"title":"罗曼·波兰斯基(和其他人)受审","authors":"E. Mazierska","doi":"10.1080/2040350X.2022.2088135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article engages with arguments in recent discussions about Polanski’s personal conduct, and the effect of these discussions on the reception of his films. It also uses these debates to shed light on the changing attitudes toward cinema and art at large, pointing to the growing importance of the artists’ personal conduct, especially sexual conduct, in the assessment of their work, including making spotless behaviour a condition to reach the audience. It does so from a position which is critical of censorship. The article draws on Polanski’s biography, especially the part describing his encounter with Samantha Gailer (now Samantha Geimer) and recent journalistic discourse about his conduct and films, following the rise of the #MeToo movement. It is informed by debates about authorship in film and art and the relationship between moral and aesthetic values.","PeriodicalId":52267,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Eastern European Cinema","volume":"284 1","pages":"211 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roman Polanski (and Others) on Trial\",\"authors\":\"E. Mazierska\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2040350X.2022.2088135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article engages with arguments in recent discussions about Polanski’s personal conduct, and the effect of these discussions on the reception of his films. It also uses these debates to shed light on the changing attitudes toward cinema and art at large, pointing to the growing importance of the artists’ personal conduct, especially sexual conduct, in the assessment of their work, including making spotless behaviour a condition to reach the audience. It does so from a position which is critical of censorship. The article draws on Polanski’s biography, especially the part describing his encounter with Samantha Gailer (now Samantha Geimer) and recent journalistic discourse about his conduct and films, following the rise of the #MeToo movement. It is informed by debates about authorship in film and art and the relationship between moral and aesthetic values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Eastern European Cinema\",\"volume\":\"284 1\",\"pages\":\"211 - 228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Eastern European Cinema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2040350X.2022.2088135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Eastern European Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2040350X.2022.2088135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract This article engages with arguments in recent discussions about Polanski’s personal conduct, and the effect of these discussions on the reception of his films. It also uses these debates to shed light on the changing attitudes toward cinema and art at large, pointing to the growing importance of the artists’ personal conduct, especially sexual conduct, in the assessment of their work, including making spotless behaviour a condition to reach the audience. It does so from a position which is critical of censorship. The article draws on Polanski’s biography, especially the part describing his encounter with Samantha Gailer (now Samantha Geimer) and recent journalistic discourse about his conduct and films, following the rise of the #MeToo movement. It is informed by debates about authorship in film and art and the relationship between moral and aesthetic values.