写作民主:作家“转向”的终结?从“假新闻”到“假民主化”

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION
L. Sadiki
{"title":"写作民主:作家“转向”的终结?从“假新闻”到“假民主化”","authors":"L. Sadiki","doi":"10.1386/JAMMR.11.2.113_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article problematizes questions of ontology and epistemology in the context of the study of norm-making primarily within academia (with special reference to democratization) and secondarily within media. It showcases this via description of an ongoing QNRF-funded project on democratic learning in seven Muslim countries. Through these examples, it pitches the discussion to elaborate the utility of concepts and ideas drawn from post-structuralism, namely, those having to do with discourse, identity and norms being unstable. It refers to Barthes’s notion of ‘the death of the author’ and Derrida’s ideas about the indeterminacy of linguistic forms, and the chain of signs and signifiers used to record representations and interpretations of shifting realities. This offers a welcome escape from rationalist methods, suggesting that in social constructivism and discourse analysis democratization studies would benefit from a firmer grip on understandings of norm-making via the study of speech acts and discourse. This is presented as a ‘middle ground’ that balances structure and agency with respect to the ‘chain’ of journeys in the travel of democracy.","PeriodicalId":36098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing democracy: An end of author ‘turn’?: From ‘fake news’ to ‘fake democratization'\",\"authors\":\"L. Sadiki\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/JAMMR.11.2.113_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article problematizes questions of ontology and epistemology in the context of the study of norm-making primarily within academia (with special reference to democratization) and secondarily within media. It showcases this via description of an ongoing QNRF-funded project on democratic learning in seven Muslim countries. Through these examples, it pitches the discussion to elaborate the utility of concepts and ideas drawn from post-structuralism, namely, those having to do with discourse, identity and norms being unstable. It refers to Barthes’s notion of ‘the death of the author’ and Derrida’s ideas about the indeterminacy of linguistic forms, and the chain of signs and signifiers used to record representations and interpretations of shifting realities. This offers a welcome escape from rationalist methods, suggesting that in social constructivism and discourse analysis democratization studies would benefit from a firmer grip on understandings of norm-making via the study of speech acts and discourse. This is presented as a ‘middle ground’ that balances structure and agency with respect to the ‘chain’ of journeys in the travel of democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/JAMMR.11.2.113_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JAMMR.11.2.113_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文在规范制定研究的背景下,首先在学术界(特别提到民主化),其次在媒体中提出本体论和认识论的问题。它通过描述正在进行的qnrf资助的七个穆斯林国家的民主学习项目来展示这一点。通过这些例子,它将讨论转向阐述从后结构主义中提取的概念和思想的效用,即那些与话语、身份和规范有关的概念和思想是不稳定的。它指的是巴特的“作者之死”的概念和德里达关于语言形式的不确定性的想法,以及用于记录对变化的现实的表征和解释的符号和能指链。这为摆脱理性主义方法提供了一种受欢迎的方法,表明在社会建构主义和话语分析中,通过对言语行为和话语的研究,更牢固地掌握对规范制定的理解,将有利于民主化研究。这是一种“中间地带”,在民主之旅的“链条”中平衡结构和代理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Writing democracy: An end of author ‘turn’?: From ‘fake news’ to ‘fake democratization'
This article problematizes questions of ontology and epistemology in the context of the study of norm-making primarily within academia (with special reference to democratization) and secondarily within media. It showcases this via description of an ongoing QNRF-funded project on democratic learning in seven Muslim countries. Through these examples, it pitches the discussion to elaborate the utility of concepts and ideas drawn from post-structuralism, namely, those having to do with discourse, identity and norms being unstable. It refers to Barthes’s notion of ‘the death of the author’ and Derrida’s ideas about the indeterminacy of linguistic forms, and the chain of signs and signifiers used to record representations and interpretations of shifting realities. This offers a welcome escape from rationalist methods, suggesting that in social constructivism and discourse analysis democratization studies would benefit from a firmer grip on understandings of norm-making via the study of speech acts and discourse. This is presented as a ‘middle ground’ that balances structure and agency with respect to the ‘chain’ of journeys in the travel of democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research
Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信