科技与工作中的隐私

IF 1.1 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Management Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI:10.30924/mjcmi.27.2.14
Zsófia Ásványi
{"title":"科技与工作中的隐私","authors":"Zsófia Ásványi","doi":"10.30924/mjcmi.27.2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employees' right to privacy and employers' extensive need for work-related information collide. The imbalance of authority between employers and employees and the doctrine of managerial prerogative determines the outcome of these competing interests, and therefore the right to privacy requires statutory protection. The study aims to examine the legislative (hard law) and law enforcement (soft law) achievements of European and Hungarian initiatives on organizational labor control mechanisms and to understand their possible limitations concerning the doctrine of managerial prerogative. The research method was a thematic document and literature review of appropriate legislation and case law records from the European Court of Human Rights, the Hungarian Supreme Court, and the Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information. The research results confirmed our hypothesis: current legal instruments seem to limit the control mechanisms of organizations, both in terms of content and process. However, rapid technological innovations make employee privacy a moving target, where the law provides only temporary and limited protection.","PeriodicalId":47182,"journal":{"name":"Management","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology vs privacy at work\",\"authors\":\"Zsófia Ásványi\",\"doi\":\"10.30924/mjcmi.27.2.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Employees' right to privacy and employers' extensive need for work-related information collide. The imbalance of authority between employers and employees and the doctrine of managerial prerogative determines the outcome of these competing interests, and therefore the right to privacy requires statutory protection. The study aims to examine the legislative (hard law) and law enforcement (soft law) achievements of European and Hungarian initiatives on organizational labor control mechanisms and to understand their possible limitations concerning the doctrine of managerial prerogative. The research method was a thematic document and literature review of appropriate legislation and case law records from the European Court of Human Rights, the Hungarian Supreme Court, and the Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information. The research results confirmed our hypothesis: current legal instruments seem to limit the control mechanisms of organizations, both in terms of content and process. However, rapid technological innovations make employee privacy a moving target, where the law provides only temporary and limited protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.27.2.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.27.2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

员工的隐私权与雇主对工作信息的广泛需求发生了冲突。雇主和雇员之间权力的不平衡以及管理特权原则决定了这些利益竞争的结果,因此隐私权需要法律保护。这项研究的目的是审查欧洲和匈牙利关于组织劳工控制机制的倡议的立法(硬法)和执法(软法)成就,并了解它们在管理特权学说方面可能存在的局限性。研究方法是对来自欧洲人权法院、匈牙利最高法院和匈牙利国家数据保护和信息自由管理局的适当立法和判例法记录进行专题文件和文献审查。研究结果证实了我们的假设:当前的法律文书似乎在内容和过程上限制了组织的控制机制。然而,快速的技术创新使员工隐私成为一个移动的目标,法律只能提供暂时和有限的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology vs privacy at work
Employees' right to privacy and employers' extensive need for work-related information collide. The imbalance of authority between employers and employees and the doctrine of managerial prerogative determines the outcome of these competing interests, and therefore the right to privacy requires statutory protection. The study aims to examine the legislative (hard law) and law enforcement (soft law) achievements of European and Hungarian initiatives on organizational labor control mechanisms and to understand their possible limitations concerning the doctrine of managerial prerogative. The research method was a thematic document and literature review of appropriate legislation and case law records from the European Court of Human Rights, the Hungarian Supreme Court, and the Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information. The research results confirmed our hypothesis: current legal instruments seem to limit the control mechanisms of organizations, both in terms of content and process. However, rapid technological innovations make employee privacy a moving target, where the law provides only temporary and limited protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Management
Management MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
70 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal deals with pressing problems, not only of general nature, but especially with those occurring in the countries in transition. In fact, it aims to cover functional issues, specific topics and general aspects of management related to all kinds of organizations – manufacturing and service companies, profit-making firms and non-profit organizations, private and public, as well as large and small enterprises.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信