正癸基硫酸钠鱼类急性毒性试验趋势分析、估测与实测毒性比较

Takeshi Matsuura, M. Ono, N. Yakata, Masanori Seki
{"title":"正癸基硫酸钠鱼类急性毒性试验趋势分析、估测与实测毒性比较","authors":"Takeshi Matsuura, M. Ono, N. Yakata, Masanori Seki","doi":"10.2965/jswe.44.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, it has become possible to select the test concentration range in the fish acute toxicity test using the trend analysis (TA) estimate by a categorical approach, but few studies have been conducted on comparing the TA estimate with the measured toxicity. In this study, we compared the TA estimate[48-h median lethal concentration (LC50)]and the measured toxicity (96-h LC50) of sodium n-decyl sulfate using medaka (Oryzias latipes).Our results indicated that the estimated and experimental values were 310 and 420 mg L, respectively, and the difference was within 1.5 times. Since the alkyl carbon chain length of sodium n-decyl sulfate is outside the range of alkyl carbon chain lengths in existing data, the TA estimate obtained in this study was considered an unreliable extrapolated value. Therefore, there was a concern that the basis for the determination of the concentration range in the definitive test was weak. However, it is considered possible to determine the test concentration in the definitive test with higher accuracy by considering relevant available information (e.g., 96-h LC50 of other fish species) in addition to the TA estimate.","PeriodicalId":16300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Trend Analysis Estimate and Measured Toxicity in Fish Acute Toxicity Test of Sodium n-Decyl Sulfate\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Matsuura, M. Ono, N. Yakata, Masanori Seki\",\"doi\":\"10.2965/jswe.44.179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, it has become possible to select the test concentration range in the fish acute toxicity test using the trend analysis (TA) estimate by a categorical approach, but few studies have been conducted on comparing the TA estimate with the measured toxicity. In this study, we compared the TA estimate[48-h median lethal concentration (LC50)]and the measured toxicity (96-h LC50) of sodium n-decyl sulfate using medaka (Oryzias latipes).Our results indicated that the estimated and experimental values were 310 and 420 mg L, respectively, and the difference was within 1.5 times. Since the alkyl carbon chain length of sodium n-decyl sulfate is outside the range of alkyl carbon chain lengths in existing data, the TA estimate obtained in this study was considered an unreliable extrapolated value. Therefore, there was a concern that the basis for the determination of the concentration range in the definitive test was weak. However, it is considered possible to determine the test concentration in the definitive test with higher accuracy by considering relevant available information (e.g., 96-h LC50 of other fish species) in addition to the TA estimate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2965/jswe.44.179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2965/jswe.44.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,在鱼类急性毒性试验中,利用分类法的趋势分析(TA)估计值选择试验浓度范围已成为可能,但将TA估计值与实测毒性进行比较的研究较少。在这项研究中,我们比较了TA估计[48小时中位致死浓度(LC50)]和n-decyl硫酸钠使用米达卡(Oryzias latipes)测量的毒性(96小时LC50)。我们的结果表明,估计值为310 mg L,实验值为420 mg L,相差在1.5倍以内。由于正癸基硫酸钠的烷基碳链长度在现有数据的烷基碳链长度范围之外,本研究得出的TA估计值被认为是一个不可靠的外推值。因此,人们担心确定试验中浓度范围的基础薄弱。然而,考虑到相关的可用信息(例如,其他鱼类的96-h LC50),除了TA估计之外,人们认为有可能在最终测试中以更高的准确性确定测试浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Trend Analysis Estimate and Measured Toxicity in Fish Acute Toxicity Test of Sodium n-Decyl Sulfate
Recently, it has become possible to select the test concentration range in the fish acute toxicity test using the trend analysis (TA) estimate by a categorical approach, but few studies have been conducted on comparing the TA estimate with the measured toxicity. In this study, we compared the TA estimate[48-h median lethal concentration (LC50)]and the measured toxicity (96-h LC50) of sodium n-decyl sulfate using medaka (Oryzias latipes).Our results indicated that the estimated and experimental values were 310 and 420 mg L, respectively, and the difference was within 1.5 times. Since the alkyl carbon chain length of sodium n-decyl sulfate is outside the range of alkyl carbon chain lengths in existing data, the TA estimate obtained in this study was considered an unreliable extrapolated value. Therefore, there was a concern that the basis for the determination of the concentration range in the definitive test was weak. However, it is considered possible to determine the test concentration in the definitive test with higher accuracy by considering relevant available information (e.g., 96-h LC50 of other fish species) in addition to the TA estimate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信