在健康研究中,对数据处理的同意是否应享有特权?比较法律分析

IF 2.6 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW
E. Dove, Jiahong Chen
{"title":"在健康研究中,对数据处理的同意是否应享有特权?比较法律分析","authors":"E. Dove, Jiahong Chen","doi":"10.1093/idpl/ipz023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several recently drafted data protection laws appear to afford a privileged position to scientific research, including health research. Provisions that might otherwise apply to data subjects and data controllers, including rights exercisable by data subjects against controllers, are lifted or lessened. For example, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) defines scientific research broadly, stating that:","PeriodicalId":51749,"journal":{"name":"International Data Privacy Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should consent for data processing be privileged in health research? A comparative legal analysis\",\"authors\":\"E. Dove, Jiahong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/idpl/ipz023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several recently drafted data protection laws appear to afford a privileged position to scientific research, including health research. Provisions that might otherwise apply to data subjects and data controllers, including rights exercisable by data subjects against controllers, are lifted or lessened. For example, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) defines scientific research broadly, stating that:\",\"PeriodicalId\":51749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Data Privacy Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Data Privacy Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Data Privacy Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

最近起草的几项数据保护法似乎给予了包括卫生研究在内的科学研究特权地位。否则可能适用于数据主体和数据控制者的规定,包括数据主体对控制者可行使的权利,被取消或减少。例如,欧盟的通用数据保护条例2016/679 (GDPR)对科学研究进行了广泛的定义,指出:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should consent for data processing be privileged in health research? A comparative legal analysis
Several recently drafted data protection laws appear to afford a privileged position to scientific research, including health research. Provisions that might otherwise apply to data subjects and data controllers, including rights exercisable by data subjects against controllers, are lifted or lessened. For example, the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (GDPR) defines scientific research broadly, stating that:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信