比较Thandalam池塘水和RO水的浊度和电导率以提高可持续性

P. Poornachandrasekhar, V. Sivakumar
{"title":"比较Thandalam池塘水和RO水的浊度和电导率以提高可持续性","authors":"P. Poornachandrasekhar, V. Sivakumar","doi":"10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to check the potability of pond water and RO water. This is carried out by comparing the Electrical Conductivity (EC) and turbidity of two different sources of water. Materials and methods: Twenty number of samples from a local pond and potable water sources were tested for turbidity and electrical conductivity using turbidity meter and conductivity meter, respectively. Results and Discussion: On performing an independent samples t-test on the two groups considered, it is observed that there exists a significant difference between the turbidity and the EC (p <0.05). Turbidity was higher in pond water (21.20 ± 2.51) than that of RO water (6.55 ± 0.33). The concentration of EC is also higher for pond water (1.67 ± 0.35) than that of RO water (0.15 ± 0.33). Conclusion: This study shows that the pond water is not potable when compared to RO water. The pond water requires treatment prior to domestic use in order to improve sustainability.","PeriodicalId":42396,"journal":{"name":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","volume":"128 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison between Turbidity, and Electrical Conductivity of Pond Water and RO Water in Thandalam for Enhanced Sustainability\",\"authors\":\"P. Poornachandrasekhar, V. Sivakumar\",\"doi\":\"10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of this study is to check the potability of pond water and RO water. This is carried out by comparing the Electrical Conductivity (EC) and turbidity of two different sources of water. Materials and methods: Twenty number of samples from a local pond and potable water sources were tested for turbidity and electrical conductivity using turbidity meter and conductivity meter, respectively. Results and Discussion: On performing an independent samples t-test on the two groups considered, it is observed that there exists a significant difference between the turbidity and the EC (p <0.05). Turbidity was higher in pond water (21.20 ± 2.51) than that of RO water (6.55 ± 0.33). The concentration of EC is also higher for pond water (1.67 ± 0.35) than that of RO water (0.15 ± 0.33). Conclusion: This study shows that the pond water is not potable when compared to RO water. The pond water requires treatment prior to domestic use in order to improve sustainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是检查池塘水和反渗透水的饮用性。这是通过比较两种不同水源的电导率(EC)和浊度来实现的。材料和方法:分别用浊度仪和电导率仪对当地池塘和饮用水源的20个样品进行浊度和电导率测试。结果和讨论:对考虑的两组进行独立样本t检验,可以观察到浊度和EC之间存在显著差异(p <0.05)。池塘水浊度(21.20±2.51)高于反渗透水(6.55±0.33)。池水EC浓度(1.67±0.35)高于反渗透水(0.15±0.33)。结论:本研究表明,与反渗透水相比,池塘水不适合饮用。为了提高可持续性,在家庭使用之前需要对池塘水进行处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison between Turbidity, and Electrical Conductivity of Pond Water and RO Water in Thandalam for Enhanced Sustainability
Aim: The aim of this study is to check the potability of pond water and RO water. This is carried out by comparing the Electrical Conductivity (EC) and turbidity of two different sources of water. Materials and methods: Twenty number of samples from a local pond and potable water sources were tested for turbidity and electrical conductivity using turbidity meter and conductivity meter, respectively. Results and Discussion: On performing an independent samples t-test on the two groups considered, it is observed that there exists a significant difference between the turbidity and the EC (p <0.05). Turbidity was higher in pond water (21.20 ± 2.51) than that of RO water (6.55 ± 0.33). The concentration of EC is also higher for pond water (1.67 ± 0.35) than that of RO water (0.15 ± 0.33). Conclusion: This study shows that the pond water is not potable when compared to RO water. The pond water requires treatment prior to domestic use in order to improve sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences
Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信