动员情境下的约定工程

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
S. Pyastolov
{"title":"动员情境下的约定工程","authors":"S. Pyastolov","doi":"10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.2.091-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author presents the prerequisites and method of forming a mechanism for constructing socio-economic relations in a system that, due to external threats, is in the process of transition to new conditions’ set. The efficiency of the method is approved by examples from science and technology. When the short-term motive comes to the fore, \"mobilization\" is necessary. It was found however that the corresponding regulation model cannot rely on well-known conventional structures, \"worlds-conventions\". From the point of view of methodology, this might be explained by the fact that \"mobilization\" in its pure form is not an object of either market or industrial convention. This category is more consistent with the household convention, but the potential of such a structure cannot be fully disclosed within the framework of the current social contract in Russia: there is a lack of means to legitimize unplanned losses, additional spending. In addition, it is essential to have a way of thinking corresponding to the mobilization mode in the mental structures of production process participants. According to the author's hypothesis, the \"mobilization model\" is structured by means of a configurator, whose functions provide for the calculation of balances in interactions between elements of various conventions. Balances are regulated according to principles of open science. And they must be preserved, despite the emergence of scientific and imperious \"whirlwinds\". Science, institutional studies, first of all, should become a necessary element of this regulator’s construction and \"state life\". Effective mobilizing readjustment of infrastructures and informal institutions, starting with ensuring semantic sovereignty, can be organized only on a fundamental science basis. Goal-setting is consistent with the ethos of pure science. On its basis, the coordination of interactions of the regulator of the sphere of science and technology with the actors of creative, producing and training sectors of this sphere is to be achieved. An extended version of the set of worlds-agreements is proposed.","PeriodicalId":43842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Institutional Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conventions' Engineering in the Mobilization Context\",\"authors\":\"S. Pyastolov\",\"doi\":\"10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.2.091-102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author presents the prerequisites and method of forming a mechanism for constructing socio-economic relations in a system that, due to external threats, is in the process of transition to new conditions’ set. The efficiency of the method is approved by examples from science and technology. When the short-term motive comes to the fore, \\\"mobilization\\\" is necessary. It was found however that the corresponding regulation model cannot rely on well-known conventional structures, \\\"worlds-conventions\\\". From the point of view of methodology, this might be explained by the fact that \\\"mobilization\\\" in its pure form is not an object of either market or industrial convention. This category is more consistent with the household convention, but the potential of such a structure cannot be fully disclosed within the framework of the current social contract in Russia: there is a lack of means to legitimize unplanned losses, additional spending. In addition, it is essential to have a way of thinking corresponding to the mobilization mode in the mental structures of production process participants. According to the author's hypothesis, the \\\"mobilization model\\\" is structured by means of a configurator, whose functions provide for the calculation of balances in interactions between elements of various conventions. Balances are regulated according to principles of open science. And they must be preserved, despite the emergence of scientific and imperious \\\"whirlwinds\\\". Science, institutional studies, first of all, should become a necessary element of this regulator’s construction and \\\"state life\\\". Effective mobilizing readjustment of infrastructures and informal institutions, starting with ensuring semantic sovereignty, can be organized only on a fundamental science basis. Goal-setting is consistent with the ethos of pure science. On its basis, the coordination of interactions of the regulator of the sphere of science and technology with the actors of creative, producing and training sectors of this sphere is to be achieved. An extended version of the set of worlds-agreements is proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Institutional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.2.091-102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Institutional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2023.15.2.091-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者提出了在一个由于外部威胁而处于向新条件设定过渡过程中的体制中形成构建社会经济关系机制的先决条件和方法。通过科学技术实例验证了该方法的有效性。当短期动机出现时,“动员”是必要的。然而,研究发现,相应的监管模式不能依赖于众所周知的常规结构,即“世界惯例”。从方法论的角度来看,这可以解释为纯粹形式的“动员”既不是市场的对象,也不是工业惯例的对象。这一类别更符合家庭惯例,但这种结构的潜力在俄罗斯目前的社会契约框架内无法充分揭示:缺乏使计划外损失和额外支出合法化的手段。此外,在生产过程参与者的心理结构中,有一种与动员模式相对应的思维方式也是必不可少的。根据作者的假设,“动员模型”是通过配置器来构建的,配置器的功能是计算各种惯例要素之间相互作用的平衡。平衡是根据开放科学的原则来调节的。尽管出现了科学和专横的“旋风”,但它们必须得到保护。科学,首先是制度研究,应该成为这一监管机构建设和“国家生活”的必要要素。有效调动基础设施和非正式机构的调整,从确保语义主权开始,只有在基本科学的基础上才能组织起来。目标设定与纯科学的精神是一致的。在此基础上,将实现科学和技术领域的管理者与这一领域的创造、生产和培训部门的行动者之间相互作用的协调。一套世界协议的扩展版本被提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conventions' Engineering in the Mobilization Context
The author presents the prerequisites and method of forming a mechanism for constructing socio-economic relations in a system that, due to external threats, is in the process of transition to new conditions’ set. The efficiency of the method is approved by examples from science and technology. When the short-term motive comes to the fore, "mobilization" is necessary. It was found however that the corresponding regulation model cannot rely on well-known conventional structures, "worlds-conventions". From the point of view of methodology, this might be explained by the fact that "mobilization" in its pure form is not an object of either market or industrial convention. This category is more consistent with the household convention, but the potential of such a structure cannot be fully disclosed within the framework of the current social contract in Russia: there is a lack of means to legitimize unplanned losses, additional spending. In addition, it is essential to have a way of thinking corresponding to the mobilization mode in the mental structures of production process participants. According to the author's hypothesis, the "mobilization model" is structured by means of a configurator, whose functions provide for the calculation of balances in interactions between elements of various conventions. Balances are regulated according to principles of open science. And they must be preserved, despite the emergence of scientific and imperious "whirlwinds". Science, institutional studies, first of all, should become a necessary element of this regulator’s construction and "state life". Effective mobilizing readjustment of infrastructures and informal institutions, starting with ensuring semantic sovereignty, can be organized only on a fundamental science basis. Goal-setting is consistent with the ethos of pure science. On its basis, the coordination of interactions of the regulator of the sphere of science and technology with the actors of creative, producing and training sectors of this sphere is to be achieved. An extended version of the set of worlds-agreements is proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信