《法院有机法典》第443条规定的公证员文件虚假:教条和批判分析

Laura Mayer Lux
{"title":"《法院有机法典》第443条规定的公证员文件虚假:教条和批判分析","authors":"Laura Mayer Lux","doi":"10.4151/s0718-68512021000-1346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to analyze the elements and critically assess the regulation of the crime established in article 443 of the Organic Code of Courts. Using fundamentally a dogmatic methodology, the text mentions the historical background of the crime and examines the legislative technique used to describe it. Likewise, it analyzes the objective and subjective aspects of the legal description of the crime, highlighting various problems generated by its current regulation, especially from a systematic and evaluative point of view.","PeriodicalId":41757,"journal":{"name":"Teologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La falsedad documental de notarios regulada en el artículo 443 del Código Orgánico de Tribunales: análisis dogmático y crítico\",\"authors\":\"Laura Mayer Lux\",\"doi\":\"10.4151/s0718-68512021000-1346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to analyze the elements and critically assess the regulation of the crime established in article 443 of the Organic Code of Courts. Using fundamentally a dogmatic methodology, the text mentions the historical background of the crime and examines the legislative technique used to describe it. Likewise, it analyzes the objective and subjective aspects of the legal description of the crime, highlighting various problems generated by its current regulation, especially from a systematic and evaluative point of view.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4151/s0718-68512021000-1346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4151/s0718-68512021000-1346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是分析构成要件并批判性地评估《法院组织法》第443条确立的犯罪规制。本文基本上采用了一种教条式的方法,提到了犯罪的历史背景,并考察了用于描述犯罪的立法技术。同样,本文从客观和主观两个方面对犯罪的法律描述进行了分析,特别从系统和评价的角度,突出了其现行规定所产生的各种问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La falsedad documental de notarios regulada en el artículo 443 del Código Orgánico de Tribunales: análisis dogmático y crítico
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the elements and critically assess the regulation of the crime established in article 443 of the Organic Code of Courts. Using fundamentally a dogmatic methodology, the text mentions the historical background of the crime and examines the legislative technique used to describe it. Likewise, it analyzes the objective and subjective aspects of the legal description of the crime, highlighting various problems generated by its current regulation, especially from a systematic and evaluative point of view.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teologia
Teologia RELIGION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信