规划结构表征的图形分析模型和空间语法工具

IF 0.1 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
D. S. Tseluiko, A. Kirpo
{"title":"规划结构表征的图形分析模型和空间语法工具","authors":"D. S. Tseluiko, A. Kirpo","doi":"10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-3-39-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the work is to identify the similarity and difference between three layouts created by the same technical specifications in order to study the design parameters, which may be inaccessible to the designer without the syntactic analysis.Methodology/approach: Different approaches are considered in relation to space as an integral structure. Entropy and integration are used for the syntactic analysis, and j-graph is used for the stepwise depth analysis. Investigated are different works, and the precise mathematical tools for the analysis of the planning structure are chosen. The paper proposes the criteria evaluation of the effectiveness of each planning structure. A graph-analytic model is created.Research findings: The method of parsing is explained in detail, with the selection of tools and spatial values that are appropriate for the objects in question. Criteria and conditions for evaluating the planning structure effectiveness are described. A further vector of work is outlined and the potential of syntactic analysis as a method of pre-project evaluation of work is shown.Originality: The paper proposes the criteria evaluation of the planning structure effectiveness. A graph-analytic model is created. ","PeriodicalId":45402,"journal":{"name":"Tomsk State University Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graph-analytic models and space syntax tools for planning structure characterization\",\"authors\":\"D. S. Tseluiko, A. Kirpo\",\"doi\":\"10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-3-39-53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The aim of the work is to identify the similarity and difference between three layouts created by the same technical specifications in order to study the design parameters, which may be inaccessible to the designer without the syntactic analysis.Methodology/approach: Different approaches are considered in relation to space as an integral structure. Entropy and integration are used for the syntactic analysis, and j-graph is used for the stepwise depth analysis. Investigated are different works, and the precise mathematical tools for the analysis of the planning structure are chosen. The paper proposes the criteria evaluation of the effectiveness of each planning structure. A graph-analytic model is created.Research findings: The method of parsing is explained in detail, with the selection of tools and spatial values that are appropriate for the objects in question. Criteria and conditions for evaluating the planning structure effectiveness are described. A further vector of work is outlined and the potential of syntactic analysis as a method of pre-project evaluation of work is shown.Originality: The paper proposes the criteria evaluation of the planning structure effectiveness. A graph-analytic model is created. \",\"PeriodicalId\":45402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tomsk State University Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tomsk State University Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-3-39-53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomsk State University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-3-39-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项工作的目的是识别相同技术规范创建的三种布局之间的异同,以便研究设计参数,如果没有语法分析,设计师可能无法获得这些参数。方法/方法:考虑不同的方法与空间作为一个整体结构的关系。采用熵和积分法进行句法分析,采用j图法进行逐步深度分析。研究了不同的工程,选择了精确的数学工具来分析规划结构。本文提出了评价各规划结构有效性的标准。创建一个图分析模型。研究发现:详细解释了解析的方法,并选择了适合所讨论对象的工具和空间值。描述了评价规划结构有效性的标准和条件。概述了进一步的工作矢量,并说明了句法分析作为项目前工作评价方法的潜力。独创性:提出了规划结构有效性的评价标准。创建一个图分析模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Graph-analytic models and space syntax tools for planning structure characterization
Purpose: The aim of the work is to identify the similarity and difference between three layouts created by the same technical specifications in order to study the design parameters, which may be inaccessible to the designer without the syntactic analysis.Methodology/approach: Different approaches are considered in relation to space as an integral structure. Entropy and integration are used for the syntactic analysis, and j-graph is used for the stepwise depth analysis. Investigated are different works, and the precise mathematical tools for the analysis of the planning structure are chosen. The paper proposes the criteria evaluation of the effectiveness of each planning structure. A graph-analytic model is created.Research findings: The method of parsing is explained in detail, with the selection of tools and spatial values that are appropriate for the objects in question. Criteria and conditions for evaluating the planning structure effectiveness are described. A further vector of work is outlined and the potential of syntactic analysis as a method of pre-project evaluation of work is shown.Originality: The paper proposes the criteria evaluation of the planning structure effectiveness. A graph-analytic model is created. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tomsk State University Journal
Tomsk State University Journal MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信