放射化学法测定硅饼中231Pa的方法验证及测量不确定度评定

A. Dalvi, P. S. Remya Devi, K. K. Swain
{"title":"放射化学法测定硅饼中231Pa的方法验证及测量不确定度评定","authors":"A. Dalvi, P. S. Remya Devi, K. K. Swain","doi":"10.1080/22297928.2022.2049869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An in-house radiochemical procedure for the separation of 231Pa from siliceous cake - a waste stream of monazite processing plant, followed by its determination using gamma ray spectrometry, has been developed in our laboratory. Evaluation of reliability of analytical results of the radiochemical procedure is important for validating the fitness of purpose of an analytical method. The present paper describes the statistical evaluation of the analytical results obtained, by estimating the overall uncertainty in the measurement process. The bottom-up approach, also called as ISO approach (ISO/IEC guide 98-3:2008), was adopted to evaluate the overall uncertainty in which the individual sources were identified, evaluated and propagated. The major contribution to the combined uncertainty in measurement of 231Pa was from efficiency calibration. Besides this, counting statistics in the sample and chemical yield of the process incorporated significant contribution to combined uncertainty. The precision of the results obtained was found to be acceptable, as ascertained by the Horwitz Ratio, for the performance of a single laboratory. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":7793,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry Letters","volume":"45 1","pages":"174 - 184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method Validation and Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation of the Radiochemical Procedure for the Determination of 231Pa in Siliceous Cake by Gamma Spectrometry\",\"authors\":\"A. Dalvi, P. S. Remya Devi, K. K. Swain\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22297928.2022.2049869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract An in-house radiochemical procedure for the separation of 231Pa from siliceous cake - a waste stream of monazite processing plant, followed by its determination using gamma ray spectrometry, has been developed in our laboratory. Evaluation of reliability of analytical results of the radiochemical procedure is important for validating the fitness of purpose of an analytical method. The present paper describes the statistical evaluation of the analytical results obtained, by estimating the overall uncertainty in the measurement process. The bottom-up approach, also called as ISO approach (ISO/IEC guide 98-3:2008), was adopted to evaluate the overall uncertainty in which the individual sources were identified, evaluated and propagated. The major contribution to the combined uncertainty in measurement of 231Pa was from efficiency calibration. Besides this, counting statistics in the sample and chemical yield of the process incorporated significant contribution to combined uncertainty. The precision of the results obtained was found to be acceptable, as ascertained by the Horwitz Ratio, for the performance of a single laboratory. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT\",\"PeriodicalId\":7793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry Letters\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"174 - 184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22297928.2022.2049869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22297928.2022.2049869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们的实验室开发了一种内部放射化学程序,用于从硅饼中分离231Pa -一种单氮石处理厂的废物流,然后使用伽马射线能谱法进行测定。放射化学分析结果的可靠性评估对于验证分析方法的适用性是非常重要的。本文描述了通过估计测量过程中的总体不确定度对所获得的分析结果进行统计评价。采用自下而上的方法,也称为ISO方法(ISO/IEC指南98-3:2008)来评估识别、评估和传播各个来源的总体不确定性。对231Pa测量的综合不确定度的主要贡献来自效率校准。除此之外,样品的计数统计和工艺的化学产率对组合不确定度有显著的贡献。所获得的结果的精度被发现是可以接受的,正如霍维茨比所确定的那样,对于单个实验室的性能。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Method Validation and Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation of the Radiochemical Procedure for the Determination of 231Pa in Siliceous Cake by Gamma Spectrometry
Abstract An in-house radiochemical procedure for the separation of 231Pa from siliceous cake - a waste stream of monazite processing plant, followed by its determination using gamma ray spectrometry, has been developed in our laboratory. Evaluation of reliability of analytical results of the radiochemical procedure is important for validating the fitness of purpose of an analytical method. The present paper describes the statistical evaluation of the analytical results obtained, by estimating the overall uncertainty in the measurement process. The bottom-up approach, also called as ISO approach (ISO/IEC guide 98-3:2008), was adopted to evaluate the overall uncertainty in which the individual sources were identified, evaluated and propagated. The major contribution to the combined uncertainty in measurement of 231Pa was from efficiency calibration. Besides this, counting statistics in the sample and chemical yield of the process incorporated significant contribution to combined uncertainty. The precision of the results obtained was found to be acceptable, as ascertained by the Horwitz Ratio, for the performance of a single laboratory. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信