冲突研究中的大n分析

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Belgin San-Akca
{"title":"冲突研究中的大n分析","authors":"Belgin San-Akca","doi":"10.20991/ALLAZIMUTH.476414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I examine the generation and use of large-N datasets and issues related to operationalization and measurement in the study of inter-state and intra-state conflict. Specifically, I critically evaluate the work on transnational dimensions of internal conflict. I also talk about my own journey related to my research on interactions between states and nonstate armed groups. I address the gaps in existing research, the use of proxies in large-N data analysis, and talk in detail about observational data collection and coding. I argue that future research should bridge the gap between studies of conflict across the fields of Comparative Politics and International Relations. I make suggestions laying the standards of academic scholarship in collecting data and increasing transparency in research.","PeriodicalId":51976,"journal":{"name":"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large-N Analysis in the Study of Conflict\",\"authors\":\"Belgin San-Akca\",\"doi\":\"10.20991/ALLAZIMUTH.476414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I examine the generation and use of large-N datasets and issues related to operationalization and measurement in the study of inter-state and intra-state conflict. Specifically, I critically evaluate the work on transnational dimensions of internal conflict. I also talk about my own journey related to my research on interactions between states and nonstate armed groups. I address the gaps in existing research, the use of proxies in large-N data analysis, and talk in detail about observational data collection and coding. I argue that future research should bridge the gap between studies of conflict across the fields of Comparative Politics and International Relations. I make suggestions laying the standards of academic scholarship in collecting data and increasing transparency in research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20991/ALLAZIMUTH.476414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20991/ALLAZIMUTH.476414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我研究了大n数据集的生成和使用,以及在国家间和国家内部冲突研究中与操作和测量相关的问题。具体地说,我批判性地评估内部冲突的跨国维度的工作。我还谈到了我自己的旅程,与我对国家与非国家武装团体之间相互作用的研究有关。我解决了现有研究中的差距,在大n数据分析中使用代理,并详细讨论了观测数据的收集和编码。我认为,未来的研究应该弥合比较政治学和国际关系领域冲突研究之间的差距。我建议在收集数据方面制定学术奖学金的标准,并提高研究的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large-N Analysis in the Study of Conflict
In this paper, I examine the generation and use of large-N datasets and issues related to operationalization and measurement in the study of inter-state and intra-state conflict. Specifically, I critically evaluate the work on transnational dimensions of internal conflict. I also talk about my own journey related to my research on interactions between states and nonstate armed groups. I address the gaps in existing research, the use of proxies in large-N data analysis, and talk in detail about observational data collection and coding. I argue that future research should bridge the gap between studies of conflict across the fields of Comparative Politics and International Relations. I make suggestions laying the standards of academic scholarship in collecting data and increasing transparency in research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
30.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: All Azimuth is a bi-annual journal that provides a forum for academic studies on foreign policy analysis and peace research as well as theoretically-oriented policy pieces on international issues. We particularly welcome research on the nexus of peace, security, and development. We aim to publish pieces bridging the theory-practice gap; dealing with under-represented conceptual approaches in the field; and engaging in scholarly dialogue between the “center” and the “periphery”. We strongly encourage, therefore, publications with homegrown theoretical and philosophical approaches. In this sense, All Azimuth aims to transcend conventional theoretical, methodological, geographical, academic and cultural boundaries. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editor. If found suitable for further consideration, manuscripts will be assessed through double-blind peer-review by independent, anonymous experts. All Azimuth is published by the Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research, a non-profit and nonpartisan organization dedicated to helping develop agendas and promote policies that contribute to the peaceful resolution of international and inter-communal conflicts taking place particularly in the regions surrounding Turkey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信