引导:5年的评估经验

软件 Pub Date : 1997-07-14 DOI:10.1109/STEP.1997.615525
Hans Stienen, Hartmut Gierszal
{"title":"引导:5年的评估经验","authors":"Hans Stienen, Hartmut Gierszal","doi":"10.1109/STEP.1997.615525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main characteristics of the BOOTSTRAP method are briefly described, i.e. the reference framework, the assessment procedure, the structure of the questionnaires and the rating and scoring mechanisms used. The major part deals with the results of the BOOTSTRAP assessments performed worldwide over the last 5 years. In this part, major experiences from over 40 sites and 180 projects are analysed in detail and summarised. The empirical data support the basic concepts of the Capability Maturity Model (CMM), but demonstrate that the more detailed profiles the BOOTSTRAP method provides are an excellent instrument to identify strengths and weaknesses of an organisation. BOOTSTRAP proved to be a very efficient and effective means not only to assess the current status of software process quality but also to initiate appropriate improvement actions. The last part deals with future trends in software process assessment approaches, i.e. the development of a common framework for performing assessments.","PeriodicalId":68622,"journal":{"name":"软件","volume":"492 1","pages":"371-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BOOTSTRAP: five years of assessment experience\",\"authors\":\"Hans Stienen, Hartmut Gierszal\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STEP.1997.615525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main characteristics of the BOOTSTRAP method are briefly described, i.e. the reference framework, the assessment procedure, the structure of the questionnaires and the rating and scoring mechanisms used. The major part deals with the results of the BOOTSTRAP assessments performed worldwide over the last 5 years. In this part, major experiences from over 40 sites and 180 projects are analysed in detail and summarised. The empirical data support the basic concepts of the Capability Maturity Model (CMM), but demonstrate that the more detailed profiles the BOOTSTRAP method provides are an excellent instrument to identify strengths and weaknesses of an organisation. BOOTSTRAP proved to be a very efficient and effective means not only to assess the current status of software process quality but also to initiate appropriate improvement actions. The last part deals with future trends in software process assessment approaches, i.e. the development of a common framework for performing assessments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"软件\",\"volume\":\"492 1\",\"pages\":\"371-379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"软件\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.1997.615525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"软件","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.1997.615525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

简要介绍了BOOTSTRAP方法的主要特点,即参考框架、评估程序、问卷结构和使用的评级和评分机制。报告的主要部分是过去5年来在全球范围内进行的BOOTSTRAP评估的结果。在这一部分中,详细分析和总结了来自40多个站点和180个项目的主要经验。经验数据支持能力成熟度模型(CMM)的基本概念,但证明了BOOTSTRAP方法提供的更详细的概要文件是识别组织优势和劣势的优秀工具。BOOTSTRAP被证明是一种非常有效的方法,不仅可以评估软件过程质量的当前状态,还可以发起适当的改进行动。最后一部分讨论了软件过程评估方法的未来趋势,即执行评估的通用框架的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BOOTSTRAP: five years of assessment experience
The main characteristics of the BOOTSTRAP method are briefly described, i.e. the reference framework, the assessment procedure, the structure of the questionnaires and the rating and scoring mechanisms used. The major part deals with the results of the BOOTSTRAP assessments performed worldwide over the last 5 years. In this part, major experiences from over 40 sites and 180 projects are analysed in detail and summarised. The empirical data support the basic concepts of the Capability Maturity Model (CMM), but demonstrate that the more detailed profiles the BOOTSTRAP method provides are an excellent instrument to identify strengths and weaknesses of an organisation. BOOTSTRAP proved to be a very efficient and effective means not only to assess the current status of software process quality but also to initiate appropriate improvement actions. The last part deals with future trends in software process assessment approaches, i.e. the development of a common framework for performing assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11857
期刊介绍: Computer engineering & Software, founded in 1979, is an academic journal of information technology sponsored by China Association for Science and Technology and China Institute of Electronics and Tianjin Institute of Electronics. Computer engineering & Software has columns such as expert Forum, Fund project papers, software and database technology research, application technology and research, network and communication, image processing and application, multimedia technology application Artificial intelligence and recognition. Computer engineering & Software is the source Journal of China Academic Periodical Comprehensive Evaluation Database, the Journal of China Core Periodical (Selection) Database, the source journal of Peking University's Chinese Core Periodical Overview (the first edition in 1992), the Journal of Wanfang data-Digital Periodical Group full-text Collection, the Journal of Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (full-text edition), and Wave Journals included in the "Copernicus Index" have been included in the United States "Cambridge Scientific Abstracts", the United States "Uhlig International Journal Guide", the JST Japan Science and Technology Promotion Agency database (2018) and other Chinese and foreign databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信