马来西亚海上天然气生产商井口泄漏问题的整体分析、诊断和操作理念

Junnyaruin Barat, Arie Muchalis Utta, Shaturrvetan Karpaya, L. Maluan, Sharon Ellen Lidwin
{"title":"马来西亚海上天然气生产商井口泄漏问题的整体分析、诊断和操作理念","authors":"Junnyaruin Barat, Arie Muchalis Utta, Shaturrvetan Karpaya, L. Maluan, Sharon Ellen Lidwin","doi":"10.4043/31553-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since the beginning of production, well NA2 and NA3 wells had issues with wellhead integrity due to thermal growth and wellhead tilting. Seepage was observed from wellhead and based on gas chromatography test, the seepage is Synthetic Based Mud (SBM), possibly from B and C annulus (intermediate and surface casing). For well NA3, seepage was observed coming out from the connection of Casing Head and Drive Pipe Housing House (DPHH) while for Well A2, seepage was found between DPHH and conductor. The issues arise from the failed elastomer seals found at the connections of leak of each well suspected due to well growth/shrink and tilting which caused the wear and tear of the seals. The seepage of both wells was rectified by injecting the failed elastomer seals with pressure activated sealant to the P-seal and grease to the elastomer. Both wells managed to produce at the capped production rate without seepage as of today. Another main issue at Field N is the leaking of metal-to-metal seal at Xmas Tree which led to production deferment. Due to the failed barrier at surface, interim philosophy was established to operate the field and rectification plan was implemented to ensure the well is producing safely at the calculated risk.\n This paper describes the analysis and diagnosis, operating philosophy outline by operator which led to the well safely producing at the desired rate: (1) Standing Instruction (SI) for Well Production Ramp Up and Down based on trending of production and temperature to ensure wellhead growth and tilting will not affecting the integrity of sealant, (2) Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Wellhead Growth Study to develop operating limit and maximum allowable growth, correlated with well production and temperature, (3) logging and survey for well leak detection and echometer survey, (4) Wellhead Seal Injection for corrective maintenance upon seepage observed, (5) manual measurement of growth and tilting and utilizing laser sensor for automation, (6) External Slip Lock Brace Support (ESBS) Installation to mitigate abnormal relative growth and (7) risk assessment for well integrity.\n The holistic approach in diagnostic, monitoring and operating philosophy enabled the well to be ramped up to higher production despite the threat of losing the gas production. PCSB also avoided the utilization of rig to rectify the well which resulted in cost avoidance for the company.","PeriodicalId":11011,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holistic Analysis, Diagnostics and Operating Philosophy for Wellhead Leak Issue for Gas Producer, Offshore Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"Junnyaruin Barat, Arie Muchalis Utta, Shaturrvetan Karpaya, L. Maluan, Sharon Ellen Lidwin\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/31553-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Since the beginning of production, well NA2 and NA3 wells had issues with wellhead integrity due to thermal growth and wellhead tilting. Seepage was observed from wellhead and based on gas chromatography test, the seepage is Synthetic Based Mud (SBM), possibly from B and C annulus (intermediate and surface casing). For well NA3, seepage was observed coming out from the connection of Casing Head and Drive Pipe Housing House (DPHH) while for Well A2, seepage was found between DPHH and conductor. The issues arise from the failed elastomer seals found at the connections of leak of each well suspected due to well growth/shrink and tilting which caused the wear and tear of the seals. The seepage of both wells was rectified by injecting the failed elastomer seals with pressure activated sealant to the P-seal and grease to the elastomer. Both wells managed to produce at the capped production rate without seepage as of today. Another main issue at Field N is the leaking of metal-to-metal seal at Xmas Tree which led to production deferment. Due to the failed barrier at surface, interim philosophy was established to operate the field and rectification plan was implemented to ensure the well is producing safely at the calculated risk.\\n This paper describes the analysis and diagnosis, operating philosophy outline by operator which led to the well safely producing at the desired rate: (1) Standing Instruction (SI) for Well Production Ramp Up and Down based on trending of production and temperature to ensure wellhead growth and tilting will not affecting the integrity of sealant, (2) Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Wellhead Growth Study to develop operating limit and maximum allowable growth, correlated with well production and temperature, (3) logging and survey for well leak detection and echometer survey, (4) Wellhead Seal Injection for corrective maintenance upon seepage observed, (5) manual measurement of growth and tilting and utilizing laser sensor for automation, (6) External Slip Lock Brace Support (ESBS) Installation to mitigate abnormal relative growth and (7) risk assessment for well integrity.\\n The holistic approach in diagnostic, monitoring and operating philosophy enabled the well to be ramped up to higher production despite the threat of losing the gas production. PCSB also avoided the utilization of rig to rectify the well which resulted in cost avoidance for the company.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/31553-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31553-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自投产以来,由于井口热生长和井口倾斜,NA2井和NA3井的井口完整性存在问题。从井口处观察到渗漏现象,根据气相色谱测试,渗出物为合成基泥浆(SBM),可能来自B环空和C环空(中间套管和地面套管)。NA3井从套管头与驱动管外壳(DPHH)连接处渗漏,A2井从DPHH与导管之间渗漏。问题的起因是在每口井的泄漏连接处发现了失效的弹性体密封件,这是由于井的生长/收缩和倾斜导致密封件磨损造成的。通过向p密封注入压力激活密封胶,并向弹性体注入润滑脂,两口井的渗漏都得到了纠正。截至今天,这两口井都以封顶的生产速度进行了生产,没有发生渗漏。油田N的另一个主要问题是圣诞树处金属对金属密封泄漏,导致生产延期。由于地面屏障失效,建立了临时理念来操作现场,并实施了整改计划,以确保油井在计算的风险下安全生产。本文介绍了作业者对该井的分析诊断和作业理念,使该井能够以预期的速度安全生产。(1)根据产量和温度的趋势,制定井口产量上升和下降的常备指令(SI),以确保井口增长和倾斜不会影响密封胶的完整性;(2)有限元分析(FEA)和井口增长研究,以制定与油井产量和温度相关的作业极限和最大允许增长;(3)测井和测量,用于油井泄漏检测和遥测测量;(4)井口密封注入,在观察到渗漏后进行纠正性维护;(5)人工测量生长和倾斜,并利用激光传感器实现自动化;(6)安装外部滑动锁支撑支撑(ESBS),以减轻异常的相对生长;(7)对油井完整性进行风险评估。在诊断、监测和操作理念方面的整体方法使该井能够在失去天然气生产的威胁下提高产量。PCSB还避免了使用钻机进行纠井,从而为公司节省了成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Holistic Analysis, Diagnostics and Operating Philosophy for Wellhead Leak Issue for Gas Producer, Offshore Malaysia
Since the beginning of production, well NA2 and NA3 wells had issues with wellhead integrity due to thermal growth and wellhead tilting. Seepage was observed from wellhead and based on gas chromatography test, the seepage is Synthetic Based Mud (SBM), possibly from B and C annulus (intermediate and surface casing). For well NA3, seepage was observed coming out from the connection of Casing Head and Drive Pipe Housing House (DPHH) while for Well A2, seepage was found between DPHH and conductor. The issues arise from the failed elastomer seals found at the connections of leak of each well suspected due to well growth/shrink and tilting which caused the wear and tear of the seals. The seepage of both wells was rectified by injecting the failed elastomer seals with pressure activated sealant to the P-seal and grease to the elastomer. Both wells managed to produce at the capped production rate without seepage as of today. Another main issue at Field N is the leaking of metal-to-metal seal at Xmas Tree which led to production deferment. Due to the failed barrier at surface, interim philosophy was established to operate the field and rectification plan was implemented to ensure the well is producing safely at the calculated risk. This paper describes the analysis and diagnosis, operating philosophy outline by operator which led to the well safely producing at the desired rate: (1) Standing Instruction (SI) for Well Production Ramp Up and Down based on trending of production and temperature to ensure wellhead growth and tilting will not affecting the integrity of sealant, (2) Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Wellhead Growth Study to develop operating limit and maximum allowable growth, correlated with well production and temperature, (3) logging and survey for well leak detection and echometer survey, (4) Wellhead Seal Injection for corrective maintenance upon seepage observed, (5) manual measurement of growth and tilting and utilizing laser sensor for automation, (6) External Slip Lock Brace Support (ESBS) Installation to mitigate abnormal relative growth and (7) risk assessment for well integrity. The holistic approach in diagnostic, monitoring and operating philosophy enabled the well to be ramped up to higher production despite the threat of losing the gas production. PCSB also avoided the utilization of rig to rectify the well which resulted in cost avoidance for the company.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信