从18世纪到1848年奥地利专制主义学生革命,审查法对维也纳解剖学教科书的影响。

Sophia Bauer, Leo Maria Schaukal, W. Weninger
{"title":"从18世纪到1848年奥地利专制主义学生革命,审查法对维也纳解剖学教科书的影响。","authors":"Sophia Bauer, Leo Maria Schaukal, W. Weninger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4330785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nAnatomy textbooks´ connection to the rigid censoring laws enacted by Habsburg rulers, was never sufficiently investigated. Using anatomy textbooks written at the University of Vienna, our article aims at investigating the influence of censorship laws on the anatomy textbooks in Vienna between 1786 and 1865.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn our case study we compared legal text and archival sources (source material A) with seven prefaces of textbooks written by Viennese anatomists (source material B). The prefaces were comparatively investigated by applying the following questions based on source material A: (1) What motives for writing the textbooks were indicated by the anatomists in the prefaces? (2) What legal or other influences were mentioned as motives that point to a connection to the censorship regulations installed? (3) Referring to changing censorship guidelines is there a change in the mentioned audience?\n\n\nRESULTS\nOur results are that we found evidence for censorship regulations (source material A) in the prefaces (source material B). Also, the motives for writing those textbooks changed over time because of changing censorship regulations.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOur findings show that Viennese anatomy textbooks were part of the Austrian censorship laws in the investigated period with a timely correlation between the appointment as professor and the publication of the textbooks and prefaces (indirectly) referring to censorship laws. The academic tradition of writing textbooks arose from this system, when freedom of speech stood in opposition to the absolute Habsburg reign. Thus, when working with historical anatomy textbooks it is important to reflect on their censorship heritage.","PeriodicalId":93872,"journal":{"name":"Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft","volume":"296 1","pages":"152129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"yThe influence of censorship laws on Viennese anatomy textbooks from the outgoing 18th Century until after the student revolution of 1848 in Austrian absolutism.\",\"authors\":\"Sophia Bauer, Leo Maria Schaukal, W. Weninger\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.4330785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nAnatomy textbooks´ connection to the rigid censoring laws enacted by Habsburg rulers, was never sufficiently investigated. Using anatomy textbooks written at the University of Vienna, our article aims at investigating the influence of censorship laws on the anatomy textbooks in Vienna between 1786 and 1865.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nIn our case study we compared legal text and archival sources (source material A) with seven prefaces of textbooks written by Viennese anatomists (source material B). The prefaces were comparatively investigated by applying the following questions based on source material A: (1) What motives for writing the textbooks were indicated by the anatomists in the prefaces? (2) What legal or other influences were mentioned as motives that point to a connection to the censorship regulations installed? (3) Referring to changing censorship guidelines is there a change in the mentioned audience?\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOur results are that we found evidence for censorship regulations (source material A) in the prefaces (source material B). Also, the motives for writing those textbooks changed over time because of changing censorship regulations.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nOur findings show that Viennese anatomy textbooks were part of the Austrian censorship laws in the investigated period with a timely correlation between the appointment as professor and the publication of the textbooks and prefaces (indirectly) referring to censorship laws. The academic tradition of writing textbooks arose from this system, when freedom of speech stood in opposition to the absolute Habsburg reign. Thus, when working with historical anatomy textbooks it is important to reflect on their censorship heritage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft\",\"volume\":\"296 1\",\"pages\":\"152129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4330785\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4330785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解剖学教科书与哈布斯堡统治者制定的严格审查法的联系从未得到充分调查。我们的文章使用维也纳大学编写的解剖学教科书,旨在调查审查法对1786年至1865年间维也纳解剖学教科书的影响。方法在案例研究中,我们将法律文本和档案资料(源材料A)与维也纳解剖学家编写的教科书(源材料B)的7个前言进行了比较研究。在源材料A的基础上,应用以下问题对前言进行了比较研究:(1)解剖学家在前言中表明了编写教科书的动机是什么?(2)哪些法律或其他影响被提及为指向与所安装的审查规定有关的动机?(三)关于审查方针的变化,上述受众是否有变化?我们的研究结果是,我们在前言(源材料B)中发现了审查制度(源材料A)的证据。此外,由于审查制度的变化,编写这些教科书的动机也随着时间的推移而改变。结论研究发现,维也纳解剖学教科书是奥地利审查法的一部分,教授的任命与教科书和前言的出版(间接)涉及审查法之间存在及时的相关性。撰写教科书的学术传统源于这一制度,当时言论自由与哈布斯堡王朝的绝对统治背道而驰。因此,在处理历史解剖学教科书时,反思它们的审查传统是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
yThe influence of censorship laws on Viennese anatomy textbooks from the outgoing 18th Century until after the student revolution of 1848 in Austrian absolutism.
INTRODUCTION Anatomy textbooks´ connection to the rigid censoring laws enacted by Habsburg rulers, was never sufficiently investigated. Using anatomy textbooks written at the University of Vienna, our article aims at investigating the influence of censorship laws on the anatomy textbooks in Vienna between 1786 and 1865. METHODS In our case study we compared legal text and archival sources (source material A) with seven prefaces of textbooks written by Viennese anatomists (source material B). The prefaces were comparatively investigated by applying the following questions based on source material A: (1) What motives for writing the textbooks were indicated by the anatomists in the prefaces? (2) What legal or other influences were mentioned as motives that point to a connection to the censorship regulations installed? (3) Referring to changing censorship guidelines is there a change in the mentioned audience? RESULTS Our results are that we found evidence for censorship regulations (source material A) in the prefaces (source material B). Also, the motives for writing those textbooks changed over time because of changing censorship regulations. CONCLUSION Our findings show that Viennese anatomy textbooks were part of the Austrian censorship laws in the investigated period with a timely correlation between the appointment as professor and the publication of the textbooks and prefaces (indirectly) referring to censorship laws. The academic tradition of writing textbooks arose from this system, when freedom of speech stood in opposition to the absolute Habsburg reign. Thus, when working with historical anatomy textbooks it is important to reflect on their censorship heritage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信