Ἀποκρίματα和Kaiserkonstitutionen

IF 0.3 4区社会学 Q2 HISTORY

Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Pub Date : 2017-06-22 DOI:10.1163/15718190-08512P07

Anna Plisecka

{"title":"Ἀποκρίματα和Kaiserkonstitutionen","authors":"Anna Plisecka","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08512P07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents an attempt to comprehend the ἀποκρίματα within the system of Roman imperial constitutions. Whereas it is generally assumed, that the ἀποκρίματα were identical with the subscripts, it is argued that they constituted a kind of imperial enactment sui generis, which cannot be identified with any of the known types of constitutions. We find the term ἀπόκριμα, which had no technical meaning until the end of the second century, being used with a consistent connotation only after the visit of Septimius Severus and Caracalla to Egypt. Furthermore, it refers specifically to the group of decisions, which the both emperors have issued in Alexandria during that visit.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ἀποκρίματα und die Kaiserkonstitutionen\",\"authors\":\"Anna Plisecka\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718190-08512P07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents an attempt to comprehend the ἀποκρίματα within the system of Roman imperial constitutions. Whereas it is generally assumed, that the ἀποκρίματα were identical with the subscripts, it is argued that they constituted a kind of imperial enactment sui generis, which cannot be identified with any of the known types of constitutions. We find the term ἀπόκριμα, which had no technical meaning until the end of the second century, being used with a consistent connotation only after the visit of Septimius Severus and Caracalla to Egypt. Furthermore, it refers specifically to the group of decisions, which the both emperors have issued in Alexandria during that visit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08512P07\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08512P07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文试图理解罗马帝国宪法体系中的ο οκρ末梢ματα。通常认为，ο οκρ末路ματα与下标是相同的，但认为它们构成了一种自成体系的帝国法规，不能与任何已知的宪法类型相一致。我们发现，直到公元二世纪末，“π ο κριμα”这个术语还没有技术意义，直到塞普提米乌斯·塞维鲁和卡拉卡拉访问埃及之后，这个术语才有了一致的含义。此外，它具体指的是两位皇帝在那次访问期间在亚历山大发布的一系列决定。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Ἀποκρίματα und die Kaiserkonstitutionen

The article presents an attempt to comprehend the ἀποκρίματα within the system of Roman imperial constitutions. Whereas it is generally assumed, that the ἀποκρίματα were identical with the subscripts, it is argued that they constituted a kind of imperial enactment sui generis, which cannot be identified with any of the known types of constitutions. We find the term ἀπόκριμα, which had no technical meaning until the end of the second century, being used with a consistent connotation only after the visit of Septimius Severus and Caracalla to Egypt. Furthermore, it refers specifically to the group of decisions, which the both emperors have issued in Alexandria during that visit.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Multiple-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Legal History Review, inspired by E.M. Meijers, is a peer-reviewed journal and was founded in 1918 by a number of Dutch jurists, who set out to stimulate scholarly interest in legal history in their own country and also to provide a centre for international cooperation in the subject. This has gradually through the years been achieved. The Review had already become one of the leading internationally known periodicals in the field before 1940. Since 1950 when it emerged under Belgo-Dutch editorship its position strengthened. Much attention is paid not only to the common foundations of the western legal tradition but also to the special, frequently divergent development of national law in the various countries belonging to, or influenced by it.