{"title":"服务创新能力:系统的文献综述与研究议程","authors":"Tadhg Blommerde","doi":"10.1080/02642069.2023.2249830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Though singular or discrete service innovations are accepted as essential to the performance and survival of organizations, practitioners and researchers are increasingly directing their attention towards the firm-level capability that underlies their repeated and continuous introduction, commonly referred to as service innovation capability (SIC). However, compared to the rich body of literature on the innovation capability of manufacturers and industrial organizations, SIC is poorly understood by managers and service researchers and there is no consensus on its definition, antecedents, outcomes, or dimensions. This study remedies this protracted gap through a comprehensive review of 45 academic journals reporting on firm-level studies of SIC using the SPAR-4-SLR protocol. These were found in the Web of Science and Scopus databases and analyzed according to the TCCM framework. Our research provides new theoretical and managerial insights, advancing a consolidated original definition of SIC, reconciles and organizes factors in SIC’s nomological network advanced by disparate studies and synthesizes links between them in an integrating framework, and makes 13 propositions for advancing this topic based on the research gaps identified.","PeriodicalId":22929,"journal":{"name":"The Service Industries Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"1197 - 1227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service innovation capability: a systematic literature review and research agenda\",\"authors\":\"Tadhg Blommerde\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02642069.2023.2249830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Though singular or discrete service innovations are accepted as essential to the performance and survival of organizations, practitioners and researchers are increasingly directing their attention towards the firm-level capability that underlies their repeated and continuous introduction, commonly referred to as service innovation capability (SIC). However, compared to the rich body of literature on the innovation capability of manufacturers and industrial organizations, SIC is poorly understood by managers and service researchers and there is no consensus on its definition, antecedents, outcomes, or dimensions. This study remedies this protracted gap through a comprehensive review of 45 academic journals reporting on firm-level studies of SIC using the SPAR-4-SLR protocol. These were found in the Web of Science and Scopus databases and analyzed according to the TCCM framework. Our research provides new theoretical and managerial insights, advancing a consolidated original definition of SIC, reconciles and organizes factors in SIC’s nomological network advanced by disparate studies and synthesizes links between them in an integrating framework, and makes 13 propositions for advancing this topic based on the research gaps identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Service Industries Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1197 - 1227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Service Industries Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2249830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Service Industries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2249830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然单一或离散的服务创新被认为对组织的绩效和生存至关重要,但从业者和研究人员越来越多地将注意力转向企业层面的能力,这种能力是重复和持续引入服务创新的基础,通常称为服务创新能力(SIC)。然而,与大量关于制造商和产业组织创新能力的文献相比,管理者和服务研究人员对创新能力的理解甚少,对创新能力的定义、前因由、结果或维度都没有达成共识。本研究通过对45份学术期刊的全面回顾,弥补了这一长期的差距,这些期刊报道了使用SPAR-4-SLR协议进行的企业层面的SIC研究。这些是在Web of Science和Scopus数据库中找到的,并根据TCCM框架进行分析。我们的研究提供了新的理论和管理见解,提出了一个统一的原始SIC定义,协调和组织了不同研究提出的SIC法理学网络中的因素,并在一个整合的框架中综合了它们之间的联系,并根据发现的研究差距提出了推进这一主题的13项建议。
Service innovation capability: a systematic literature review and research agenda
ABSTRACT Though singular or discrete service innovations are accepted as essential to the performance and survival of organizations, practitioners and researchers are increasingly directing their attention towards the firm-level capability that underlies their repeated and continuous introduction, commonly referred to as service innovation capability (SIC). However, compared to the rich body of literature on the innovation capability of manufacturers and industrial organizations, SIC is poorly understood by managers and service researchers and there is no consensus on its definition, antecedents, outcomes, or dimensions. This study remedies this protracted gap through a comprehensive review of 45 academic journals reporting on firm-level studies of SIC using the SPAR-4-SLR protocol. These were found in the Web of Science and Scopus databases and analyzed according to the TCCM framework. Our research provides new theoretical and managerial insights, advancing a consolidated original definition of SIC, reconciles and organizes factors in SIC’s nomological network advanced by disparate studies and synthesizes links between them in an integrating framework, and makes 13 propositions for advancing this topic based on the research gaps identified.