民主和两极分化。论两极分化时代的艾金和塔利斯的政治论述

Q4 Arts and Humanities

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-31 DOI:10.24917/20841043.10.2.10

A. Vaidya

{"title":"民主和两极分化。论两极分化时代的艾金和塔利斯的政治论述","authors":"A. Vaidya","doi":"10.24917/20841043.10.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our tools for promoting civility are inevitably condemned to produce new forms of in‑ civility, and the pathologies of public discourse are always at least one step ahead of our capacity to understand and correct them. The tragedy is inescapable (Aikin & Talisse, 2020: 127, emphasis added ).","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democracy and polarization. Comments on Aikin and Talisse’s Political argument in a polarized age\",\"authors\":\"A. Vaidya\",\"doi\":\"10.24917/20841043.10.2.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our tools for promoting civility are inevitably condemned to produce new forms of in‑ civility, and the pathologies of public discourse are always at least one step ahead of our capacity to understand and correct them. The tragedy is inescapable (Aikin & Talisse, 2020: 127, emphasis added ).\",\"PeriodicalId\":30403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.10.2.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.10.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

我们促进文明的工具不可避免地会产生新的不文明形式，而公共话语的病态总是比我们理解和纠正它们的能力至少超前一步。悲剧是不可避免的(Aikin & Talisse, 2020: 127，重点添加)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Democracy and polarization. Comments on Aikin and Talisse’s Political argument in a polarized age

Our tools for promoting civility are inevitably condemned to produce new forms of in‑ civility, and the pathologies of public discourse are always at least one step ahead of our capacity to understand and correct them. The tragedy is inescapable (Aikin & Talisse, 2020: 127, emphasis added ).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks