围产期悲伤量表的心理测量学研究进展

Q2 Social Sciences
P. Wright, Joan G. Carpenter
{"title":"围产期悲伤量表的心理测量学研究进展","authors":"P. Wright, Joan G. Carpenter","doi":"10.1177/10541373231163260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intense emotional and psychological consequences of pregnancy loss have been studied for decades. With the growing body of literature regarding women's experiences of pregnancy loss, there is an increased need for high quality evidence that underpins perinatal grief and bereavement support interventions. In this paper, we describe and analyze the psychometric properties of existing tools (the Perinatal Grief Scale, the Perinatal Bereavement Scale, the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale) developed specifically to measure grief following perinatal loss. The psychometric properties of these instruments are presented along with an assessment of their trustworthiness. Of the three perinatal grief instruments, the PGS is the most well-established measure of perinatal grief. The PBS, although promising, has not been as extensively tested as the PGS. The PGIS has compared favorably with the PGS and is also a good choice for use in perinatal bereavement studies despite its shorter history of use and less extensive psychometric testing.","PeriodicalId":39747,"journal":{"name":"Illness Crisis and Loss","volume":"11 1","pages":"655 - 670"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of the Psychometrics of Perinatal Grief Instruments\",\"authors\":\"P. Wright, Joan G. Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10541373231163260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The intense emotional and psychological consequences of pregnancy loss have been studied for decades. With the growing body of literature regarding women's experiences of pregnancy loss, there is an increased need for high quality evidence that underpins perinatal grief and bereavement support interventions. In this paper, we describe and analyze the psychometric properties of existing tools (the Perinatal Grief Scale, the Perinatal Bereavement Scale, the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale) developed specifically to measure grief following perinatal loss. The psychometric properties of these instruments are presented along with an assessment of their trustworthiness. Of the three perinatal grief instruments, the PGS is the most well-established measure of perinatal grief. The PBS, although promising, has not been as extensively tested as the PGS. The PGIS has compared favorably with the PGS and is also a good choice for use in perinatal bereavement studies despite its shorter history of use and less extensive psychometric testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Illness Crisis and Loss\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"655 - 670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Illness Crisis and Loss\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10541373231163260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illness Crisis and Loss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10541373231163260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数十年来,人们一直在研究流产对情绪和心理造成的严重影响。随着越来越多的文献关于妇女怀孕失败的经历,有一个高质量的证据,支持围产期悲伤和丧亲支持干预的需求增加。在本文中,我们描述和分析了现有的工具(围产期悲伤量表、围产期丧亲量表、围产期悲伤强度量表)的心理测量特性,这些工具专门用于测量围产期丧亲后的悲伤。这些工具的心理测量特性与他们的可信度评估一起提出。在三种围产期悲伤仪器中,PGS是围产期悲伤最完善的测量方法。PBS虽然很有前途,但还没有像PGS那样得到广泛的测试。与PGS相比,PGIS具有优势,尽管其使用历史较短,心理测量测试较少,但它也是围产期丧亲研究的良好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review of the Psychometrics of Perinatal Grief Instruments
The intense emotional and psychological consequences of pregnancy loss have been studied for decades. With the growing body of literature regarding women's experiences of pregnancy loss, there is an increased need for high quality evidence that underpins perinatal grief and bereavement support interventions. In this paper, we describe and analyze the psychometric properties of existing tools (the Perinatal Grief Scale, the Perinatal Bereavement Scale, the Perinatal Grief Intensity Scale) developed specifically to measure grief following perinatal loss. The psychometric properties of these instruments are presented along with an assessment of their trustworthiness. Of the three perinatal grief instruments, the PGS is the most well-established measure of perinatal grief. The PBS, although promising, has not been as extensively tested as the PGS. The PGIS has compared favorably with the PGS and is also a good choice for use in perinatal bereavement studies despite its shorter history of use and less extensive psychometric testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Illness Crisis and Loss
Illness Crisis and Loss Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: When dealing with issues of grief, crisis, or loss as a counselor, medical professional, or researcher, it can be difficult to find resources to help you in your work. Receiving the most current research on the latest topics in the field from Illness, Crisis & Loss can help. Illness, Crisis & Loss is the resource that furthers your understanding and knowledge of the psychosocial and ethical issues associated with life-threatening illness, traumatic human crises, grief, and loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信