信息与社会:研究-巴西信息科学的镜子

IF 0.1 4区 管理学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
L. V. R. Pinheiro, Tânia Chalhub
{"title":"信息与社会:研究-巴西信息科学的镜子","authors":"L. V. R. Pinheiro, Tânia Chalhub","doi":"10.22478/UFPB.1809-4783.2020V30N4.57051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Descriptiveresearch, using the metricsofinformationand communication and thecontent analysis asmethodology with a qualitative and quantitative approach. It aims to analyze the journal Informação & Sociedade: Estudos through its papers’ thematic trajectories, inorder to verify howthey followthe Information Science development process and if they represent contemporary issues in the area. Data collected in the periodic editions from 1991 to 2019 are the basis to this research, focusing onpublicatedpapers,authorsand themes.Data collectionwasperformedin thejournal’sown system, extracting information related to the authorship (name, institutional affiliation, number of authors per article) and to thearticles (title). The analysis of the papers ́ themes was carried out in a time frame from 2005 to 2019. With regard to authorship, there is acertainbalancebetween articles withtwo authorsand articleswith singleone. Overtheyears, they presentan increasing numberofauthors,aswellasalarger participationofinterinstitutionalpartnerships.Itisworthmentioningthecontributions of authors from foreign institutions, mainly from Spain, Portugal and other European countries. Inthe analysis of the prevalent themes among the articles, Competence in information, Libraries, Metrics of information and communication and Informationandknowledgemanagementarethemostfrequent.TheresultalsoshowsamixofbasicthemesofInformation Science, such as Information Retrieval with new approaches, Electronic Journals, Digital Libraries and Repositories, in addition to theoretical issues such as Epistemology of Information Science.","PeriodicalId":44127,"journal":{"name":"Informacao & Sociedade-Estudos","volume":"258 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informação & Sociedade: Estudos - Espelho da Ciência da Informação no Brasil\",\"authors\":\"L. V. R. Pinheiro, Tânia Chalhub\",\"doi\":\"10.22478/UFPB.1809-4783.2020V30N4.57051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Descriptiveresearch, using the metricsofinformationand communication and thecontent analysis asmethodology with a qualitative and quantitative approach. It aims to analyze the journal Informação & Sociedade: Estudos through its papers’ thematic trajectories, inorder to verify howthey followthe Information Science development process and if they represent contemporary issues in the area. Data collected in the periodic editions from 1991 to 2019 are the basis to this research, focusing onpublicatedpapers,authorsand themes.Data collectionwasperformedin thejournal’sown system, extracting information related to the authorship (name, institutional affiliation, number of authors per article) and to thearticles (title). The analysis of the papers ́ themes was carried out in a time frame from 2005 to 2019. With regard to authorship, there is acertainbalancebetween articles withtwo authorsand articleswith singleone. Overtheyears, they presentan increasing numberofauthors,aswellasalarger participationofinterinstitutionalpartnerships.Itisworthmentioningthecontributions of authors from foreign institutions, mainly from Spain, Portugal and other European countries. Inthe analysis of the prevalent themes among the articles, Competence in information, Libraries, Metrics of information and communication and Informationandknowledgemanagementarethemostfrequent.TheresultalsoshowsamixofbasicthemesofInformation Science, such as Information Retrieval with new approaches, Electronic Journals, Digital Libraries and Repositories, in addition to theoretical issues such as Epistemology of Information Science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informacao & Sociedade-Estudos\",\"volume\":\"258 1\",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informacao & Sociedade-Estudos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22478/UFPB.1809-4783.2020V30N4.57051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informacao & Sociedade-Estudos","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22478/UFPB.1809-4783.2020V30N4.57051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

描述性研究,使用度量、信息和沟通以及内容分析作为方法论,采用定性和定量方法。它的目的是通过其论文的主题轨迹来分析《信息与社会:Estudos》杂志,以验证它们如何遵循信息科学的发展过程,以及它们是否代表了该领域的当代问题。在1991年至2019年的定期版本中收集的数据是本研究的基础,重点关注已发表的论文、作者和主题。数据收集是在期刊自己的系统中进行的,提取与作者(姓名,机构所属,每篇文章的作者人数)和文章(标题)相关的信息。论文主题的分析是在2005年至2019年的时间框架内进行的。在作者方面,两作者文章和单作者文章之间存在一定的平衡。多年来,它们呈现出越来越多的作者,以及越来越多的机构间伙伴关系的参与。值得一提的是来自国外机构的作者的贡献,主要来自西班牙、葡萄牙和其他欧洲国家。在文章的流行主题分析中,“信息能力”、“图书馆”、“信息与传播度量”和“信息与知识管理”是最常见的。结果显示了信息科学的基本主题,如新方法的信息检索、电子期刊、数字图书馆和存储库,以及理论问题,如信息科学认识论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informação & Sociedade: Estudos - Espelho da Ciência da Informação no Brasil
Descriptiveresearch, using the metricsofinformationand communication and thecontent analysis asmethodology with a qualitative and quantitative approach. It aims to analyze the journal Informação & Sociedade: Estudos through its papers’ thematic trajectories, inorder to verify howthey followthe Information Science development process and if they represent contemporary issues in the area. Data collected in the periodic editions from 1991 to 2019 are the basis to this research, focusing onpublicatedpapers,authorsand themes.Data collectionwasperformedin thejournal’sown system, extracting information related to the authorship (name, institutional affiliation, number of authors per article) and to thearticles (title). The analysis of the papers ́ themes was carried out in a time frame from 2005 to 2019. With regard to authorship, there is acertainbalancebetween articles withtwo authorsand articleswith singleone. Overtheyears, they presentan increasing numberofauthors,aswellasalarger participationofinterinstitutionalpartnerships.Itisworthmentioningthecontributions of authors from foreign institutions, mainly from Spain, Portugal and other European countries. Inthe analysis of the prevalent themes among the articles, Competence in information, Libraries, Metrics of information and communication and Informationandknowledgemanagementarethemostfrequent.TheresultalsoshowsamixofbasicthemesofInformation Science, such as Information Retrieval with new approaches, Electronic Journals, Digital Libraries and Repositories, in addition to theoretical issues such as Epistemology of Information Science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informacao & Sociedade-Estudos
Informacao & Sociedade-Estudos INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信