蒙巴萨航道1号航道海上交通评价基础研究

Onyango Shem Otoi, Young Soo Park, Jin-Soo Park
{"title":"蒙巴萨航道1号航道海上交通评价基础研究","authors":"Onyango Shem Otoi, Young Soo Park, Jin-Soo Park","doi":"10.5394/KINPR.2016.40.5.257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mombasa is the principle port of Kenya, serving inland countries in Eastern and central Africa. Mombasa port has undergone a massive infrastructure upgrade and dredging works with an expectation that more vessels and large post Panamax ships will be able to enter Mombasa port. Therefore, it is vital to carry out a marine traffic risk assessment in order to quantify the degree of navigation safety needed in the Mombasa approach channel and also to evaluate the navigation risk imposed on transit traffic by local ferry traffic. In this paper, a marine traffic risk assessment is carried out using the IWRAP mk2, Environmental Stress (ES) model, and the PARK model. Risk assessment results show that Likoni area has an unacceptable stress/ risk ranking at 20.7% by the ES model and 38.89% by the PARK model. The IWRAP mk2 model shows that the crossing area has the highest risk of crossing collision and the area at the entrance to the inner channel has a high risk of grounding. The conclusions derived from this study will provide the basis for proposing the most effective countermeasure to improve navigation safety in the Mombasa approach channel.","PeriodicalId":16242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean navigation and port research","volume":"31 1","pages":"257-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Basic Study on Marine Traffic Assessment in Mombasa Approach Channel-I\",\"authors\":\"Onyango Shem Otoi, Young Soo Park, Jin-Soo Park\",\"doi\":\"10.5394/KINPR.2016.40.5.257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mombasa is the principle port of Kenya, serving inland countries in Eastern and central Africa. Mombasa port has undergone a massive infrastructure upgrade and dredging works with an expectation that more vessels and large post Panamax ships will be able to enter Mombasa port. Therefore, it is vital to carry out a marine traffic risk assessment in order to quantify the degree of navigation safety needed in the Mombasa approach channel and also to evaluate the navigation risk imposed on transit traffic by local ferry traffic. In this paper, a marine traffic risk assessment is carried out using the IWRAP mk2, Environmental Stress (ES) model, and the PARK model. Risk assessment results show that Likoni area has an unacceptable stress/ risk ranking at 20.7% by the ES model and 38.89% by the PARK model. The IWRAP mk2 model shows that the crossing area has the highest risk of crossing collision and the area at the entrance to the inner channel has a high risk of grounding. The conclusions derived from this study will provide the basis for proposing the most effective countermeasure to improve navigation safety in the Mombasa approach channel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean navigation and port research\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"257-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean navigation and port research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2016.40.5.257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean navigation and port research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2016.40.5.257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蒙巴萨是肯尼亚的主要港口,服务于东非和中非的内陆国家。蒙巴萨港进行了大规模的基础设施升级和疏浚工程,预计将有更多的船只和大型巴拿马型船舶进入蒙巴萨港。因此,开展海上交通风险评估是至关重要的,以量化蒙巴萨进近通道所需的航行安全程度,并评估当地渡轮交通对过境交通造成的航行风险。本文采用IWRAP mk2、环境应力(ES)模型和PARK模型进行了海上交通风险评估。风险评价结果表明,ES模型和PARK模型分别为20.7%和38.89%,利科尼地区为不可接受压力/风险等级。IWRAP mk2模型显示,交叉区域交叉碰撞风险最高,内通道入口区域接地风险最高。本研究的结论将为提出改善蒙巴萨进近航道航行安全的最有效对策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Basic Study on Marine Traffic Assessment in Mombasa Approach Channel-I
Mombasa is the principle port of Kenya, serving inland countries in Eastern and central Africa. Mombasa port has undergone a massive infrastructure upgrade and dredging works with an expectation that more vessels and large post Panamax ships will be able to enter Mombasa port. Therefore, it is vital to carry out a marine traffic risk assessment in order to quantify the degree of navigation safety needed in the Mombasa approach channel and also to evaluate the navigation risk imposed on transit traffic by local ferry traffic. In this paper, a marine traffic risk assessment is carried out using the IWRAP mk2, Environmental Stress (ES) model, and the PARK model. Risk assessment results show that Likoni area has an unacceptable stress/ risk ranking at 20.7% by the ES model and 38.89% by the PARK model. The IWRAP mk2 model shows that the crossing area has the highest risk of crossing collision and the area at the entrance to the inner channel has a high risk of grounding. The conclusions derived from this study will provide the basis for proposing the most effective countermeasure to improve navigation safety in the Mombasa approach channel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信