{"title":"《海龟:环境管理中目标固定和利益相关者参与的成本》","authors":"Evan M. Mistur","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2023.2223490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While stakeholder engagement can benefit managers, its implications for decision-making are not well understood. Integrating literature on stakeholder engagement and institutional theory, this paper investigates the ramifications of stakeholder involvement on organizational decision-making. It employs a qualitative comparative case study of agency managers and stakeholders involved in sea turtle management at the Georgia Department of Natural Resources to investigate the motivations and goals of different organizational actors. The results demonstrate that stakeholders can be prone to target fixation, focusing on different goals than their organization intends. Furthermore, they reveal that stakeholders’ motivations are highly resistant to attempts to align them with organizational goals, creating goal misalignment which can disrupt decision-making. These findings provide a more holistic understanding of how stakeholder engagement influences organizational management processes, formalizes how target fixation operates at the individual level, and provides critical information for administrators deciding how to utilize engagement strategies in their work.","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":"29 1","pages":"1348 - 1373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It’s Turtles All the Way down: Target Fixation and the Costs of Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Management\",\"authors\":\"Evan M. Mistur\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08941920.2023.2223490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract While stakeholder engagement can benefit managers, its implications for decision-making are not well understood. Integrating literature on stakeholder engagement and institutional theory, this paper investigates the ramifications of stakeholder involvement on organizational decision-making. It employs a qualitative comparative case study of agency managers and stakeholders involved in sea turtle management at the Georgia Department of Natural Resources to investigate the motivations and goals of different organizational actors. The results demonstrate that stakeholders can be prone to target fixation, focusing on different goals than their organization intends. Furthermore, they reveal that stakeholders’ motivations are highly resistant to attempts to align them with organizational goals, creating goal misalignment which can disrupt decision-making. These findings provide a more holistic understanding of how stakeholder engagement influences organizational management processes, formalizes how target fixation operates at the individual level, and provides critical information for administrators deciding how to utilize engagement strategies in their work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society & Natural Resources\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"1348 - 1373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society & Natural Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2223490\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2223490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
It’s Turtles All the Way down: Target Fixation and the Costs of Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Management
Abstract While stakeholder engagement can benefit managers, its implications for decision-making are not well understood. Integrating literature on stakeholder engagement and institutional theory, this paper investigates the ramifications of stakeholder involvement on organizational decision-making. It employs a qualitative comparative case study of agency managers and stakeholders involved in sea turtle management at the Georgia Department of Natural Resources to investigate the motivations and goals of different organizational actors. The results demonstrate that stakeholders can be prone to target fixation, focusing on different goals than their organization intends. Furthermore, they reveal that stakeholders’ motivations are highly resistant to attempts to align them with organizational goals, creating goal misalignment which can disrupt decision-making. These findings provide a more holistic understanding of how stakeholder engagement influences organizational management processes, formalizes how target fixation operates at the individual level, and provides critical information for administrators deciding how to utilize engagement strategies in their work.
期刊介绍:
Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management