母语(波斯语)阅读产品对EGP和ESP阅读产品和阅读过程影响的研究

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
S. Talibi
{"title":"母语(波斯语)阅读产品对EGP和ESP阅读产品和阅读过程影响的研究","authors":"S. Talibi","doi":"10.12816/0027296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the effect of reading product in L1 on EGP and ESP reading product and process. Thirty nine tertiary level students took part in this study. They were divided into two groups of high and low performers based on L1 reading test scores. Then they were given tests of reading in EGP and ESP, which were immediately followed by reading strategies questionnaire as well as an interview as retrospective measures of their reading behavior. Analysis of data evidenced that there was no significant difference between the two L1 reading ability groups in reading process in EGP and ESP as well as the reading product in ESP. But in EGP reading there was a significant difference in the reading product for high and low groups of L1 reading ability. Cook (2007) maintains the cognitive processing of information is slower and less efficient in a foreign language. As the L1 reading product is no good predictor for L2 reading success, it is recommended to get tertiary students more familiar with the L2 code so that they become independent in text processing of different general and specific genres.","PeriodicalId":53718,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Modern Languages & Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Investigation into the Effect of L1 (Persian) Reading Product on the Product and Process of Reading in EGP and ESP\",\"authors\":\"S. Talibi\",\"doi\":\"10.12816/0027296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the effect of reading product in L1 on EGP and ESP reading product and process. Thirty nine tertiary level students took part in this study. They were divided into two groups of high and low performers based on L1 reading test scores. Then they were given tests of reading in EGP and ESP, which were immediately followed by reading strategies questionnaire as well as an interview as retrospective measures of their reading behavior. Analysis of data evidenced that there was no significant difference between the two L1 reading ability groups in reading process in EGP and ESP as well as the reading product in ESP. But in EGP reading there was a significant difference in the reading product for high and low groups of L1 reading ability. Cook (2007) maintains the cognitive processing of information is slower and less efficient in a foreign language. As the L1 reading product is no good predictor for L2 reading success, it is recommended to get tertiary students more familiar with the L2 code so that they become independent in text processing of different general and specific genres.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Journal of Modern Languages & Literature\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Journal of Modern Languages & Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12816/0027296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Modern Languages & Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12816/0027296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨L1阅读产物对EGP和ESP阅读产物和过程的影响。39名大专学生参与了本研究。他们根据母语阅读测试成绩分为高、低两组。然后对他们进行了阅读能力测试和ESP测试,随后进行了阅读策略问卷调查,并对他们的阅读行为进行了回顾性的访谈。数据分析表明,两个母语阅读能力组在英语阅读过程和英语阅读产品上无显著差异,但在英语阅读产品上,高、低母语阅读能力组在英语阅读产品上有显著差异。Cook(2007)认为,在外语中,信息的认知加工速度较慢,效率较低。由于母语阅读成果并不能很好地预测第二语言阅读的成功,因此建议让大学生更加熟悉第二语言代码,以便他们在处理不同的一般和特定体裁的文本时变得独立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Investigation into the Effect of L1 (Persian) Reading Product on the Product and Process of Reading in EGP and ESP
This study investigates the effect of reading product in L1 on EGP and ESP reading product and process. Thirty nine tertiary level students took part in this study. They were divided into two groups of high and low performers based on L1 reading test scores. Then they were given tests of reading in EGP and ESP, which were immediately followed by reading strategies questionnaire as well as an interview as retrospective measures of their reading behavior. Analysis of data evidenced that there was no significant difference between the two L1 reading ability groups in reading process in EGP and ESP as well as the reading product in ESP. But in EGP reading there was a significant difference in the reading product for high and low groups of L1 reading ability. Cook (2007) maintains the cognitive processing of information is slower and less efficient in a foreign language. As the L1 reading product is no good predictor for L2 reading success, it is recommended to get tertiary students more familiar with the L2 code so that they become independent in text processing of different general and specific genres.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信